School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 8;9(1):e85092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085092. eCollection 2014.
A lack of behavioural engagement in health promotion or disease prevention is a problem across many health domains. In these cases where people face a genuine danger, a reduced focus on threat and low levels of anxiety or worry are maladaptive in terms of promoting protection or prevention behaviour. Therefore, it is possible that increasing the processing of threat will increase worry and thereby enhance engagement in adaptive behaviour. Laboratory studies have shown that cognitive bias modification (CBM) can increase or decrease anxiety and worry when increased versus decreased processing of threat is encouraged. In the current study, CBM for interpretation (CBM-I) is used to target engagement in sun protection behaviour. The goal was to investigate whether inducing a negative rather than a positive interpretation bias for physical threat information can enhance worry elicited when viewing a health campaign video (warning against melanoma skin cancer), and consequently lead to more adaptive behaviour (sun protection). Participants were successfully trained to either adopt a positive or negative interpretation bias using physical threat scenarios. However, contrary to expectations results showed that participants in the positive training condition reported higher levels of worry elicited by the melanoma video than participants in the negative training condition. Video elicited worry was, however, positively correlated with a measure of engagement in sun protection behaviour, suggesting that higher levels of worry do promote adaptive behaviour. These findings imply that more research is needed to determine under which conditions increased versus decreased processing of threat can drive adaptive worry. Various potential explanations for the current findings and suggestions for future research are discussed.
在许多健康领域,人们在促进健康或预防疾病方面缺乏行为参与是一个问题。在这些人们面临真正危险的情况下,对威胁的关注减少,焦虑或担忧程度低,不利于促进保护或预防行为。因此,增加对威胁的处理可能会增加担忧,从而增强对适应性行为的参与。实验室研究表明,认知偏差修正(CBM)可以在鼓励增加或减少威胁处理时增加或减少焦虑和担忧。在当前的研究中,使用解释性认知偏差修正(CBM-I)来针对防晒行为的参与。目的是调查对身体威胁信息的负面而不是正面的解释偏差是否可以增强观看健康运动视频(警告黑色素瘤皮肤癌)时引起的担忧,从而导致更适应的行为(防晒)。参与者成功地接受了使用身体威胁场景来采用积极或消极的解释偏差的培训。然而,与预期相反,结果表明,与消极培训条件的参与者相比,积极培训条件的参与者报告了更高水平的由黑色素瘤视频引起的担忧。视频引起的担忧与防晒行为的衡量标准呈正相关,这表明更高水平的担忧确实会促进适应性行为。这些发现意味着需要进行更多的研究,以确定在何种条件下增加或减少对威胁的处理可以引发适应性担忧。目前的研究结果存在各种潜在解释,并提出了未来研究的建议。