Suppr超能文献

在加拿大、赞比亚和南非试点的参与式定性健康促进研究分析的DEPICT模型。

The DEPICT model for participatory qualitative health promotion research analysis piloted in Canada, Zambia and South Africa.

作者信息

Flicker Sarah, Nixon Stephanie A

机构信息

Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University, 4700 Keele Street, 109 HNES, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada.

Department of Physical Therapy and Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1V7, Canada.

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2015 Sep;30(3):616-24. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dat093. Epub 2014 Jan 12.

Abstract

Health promotion researchers are increasingly conducting Community-Based Participatory Research in an effort to reduce health disparities. Despite efforts towards greater inclusion, research teams continue to regularly exclude diverse representation from data analysis efforts. The DEPICT model for collaborative qualitative analysis is a democratic approach to enhancing rigour through inclusion of diverse stakeholders. It is broken down into six sequential steps. Strong leadership, coordination and facilitation skills are needed; however, the process is flexible enough to adapt to most environments and varying levels of expertise. Including diverse stakeholders on an analysis team can enrich data analysis and provide more nuanced understandings of complicated health problems.

摘要

健康促进研究人员越来越多地开展基于社区的参与性研究,以努力减少健康差距。尽管为实现更大程度的包容性做出了努力,但研究团队在数据分析工作中仍经常排除不同的代表性。用于协作定性分析的DEPICT模型是一种通过纳入不同利益相关者来提高严谨性的民主方法。它分为六个连续步骤。这需要强大的领导、协调和促进技能;然而,该过程足够灵活,能够适应大多数环境和不同水平的专业知识。在分析团队中纳入不同的利益相关者可以丰富数据分析,并对复杂的健康问题提供更细致入微的理解。

相似文献

1
The DEPICT model for participatory qualitative health promotion research analysis piloted in Canada, Zambia and South Africa.
Health Promot Int. 2015 Sep;30(3):616-24. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dat093. Epub 2014 Jan 12.
2
Partnering with Indigenous student co-researchers: improving research processes and outcomes.
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2015 Jul 27;74:27838. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v74.27838. eCollection 2015.
4
Participatory methods for Inuit public health promotion and programme evaluation in Nunatsiavut, Canada.
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2017;76(1):1343637. doi: 10.1080/22423982.2017.1343637.
7
Value and Limitations of Broad Brush Surveys Used in Community-Randomized Trials in Southern Africa.
Qual Health Res. 2019 Apr;29(5):700-718. doi: 10.1177/1049732318809940. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
8
Community voices in program development: the wisdom of individuals with incarceration experience.
Can J Public Health. 2012 Jul 18;103(5):e379-83. doi: 10.1007/BF03404446.
10
A participatory group process to analyze qualitative data.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2008 Summer;2(2):161-70. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0010.

引用本文的文献

1
Lessons Learned About the Education Needs of Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Mixed-Method Study.
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2025 Jun 3;12:20543581251338462. doi: 10.1177/20543581251338462. eCollection 2025.
2
Co-production in HIV research: a case study from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 May 9;11(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00713-3.
3
Collaborative coding in inductive content analysis: Why, when, and how to do it.
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70030. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70030.
6
Racism in German healthcare: uncovering the construction and silencing of the "other".
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;12:1485933. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1485933. eCollection 2024.
7
8
Qualitative genomic research with Indigenous peoples: a scoping review of participatory practice.
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Oct 17;9(10):e015377. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015377.
10
Sustaining a Workforce: Reflections on Work from Home and Community Care Nurses Transitioning out of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Jul 25;10:23779608241264162. doi: 10.1177/23779608241264162. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

2
On measuring community participation in research.
Health Educ Behav. 2013 Jun;40(3):346-54. doi: 10.1177/1090198112459050. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
4
"It's a hidden issue": exploring the experiences of women with HIV-associated neurocognitive challenges using a disability framework.
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Jan;35(1):36-46. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.687029. Epub 2012 May 24.
6
A participatory group process to analyze qualitative data.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2008 Summer;2(2):161-70. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0010.
7
Using focus groups in community-based participatory research: challenges and resolutions.
Qual Health Res. 2010 May;20(5):697-706. doi: 10.1177/1049732310361468. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
8
The power and the promise: working with communities to analyze data, interpret findings, and get to outcomes.
Am J Public Health. 2008 Aug;98(8):1407-17. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.113571. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
9
A snapshot of community-based research in Canada: Who? What? Why? How?
Health Educ Res. 2008 Feb;23(1):106-14. doi: 10.1093/her/cym007. Epub 2007 Feb 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验