Tovey David
The Cochrane Library, Cochrane Editorial Unit, London, UK.
Adv Nutr. 2014 Jan 1;5(1):35-9. doi: 10.3945/an.113.004895.
This article describes the background and contribution of The Cochrane Collaboration to the WHO Nutrition Guidelines program. Systematic reviews, augmented by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology for assessing the quality of a body of evidence, form the evidence basis for WHO guidelines. Our shared experience of working together has highlighted a number of issues that are challenging, such as decisions made about selecting appropriate questions for evidence synthesis and the nature of study types that are included, in particular the decision on whether or not to extend a search beyond randomized studies. Although the skills and experience required for evidence synthesis are different from those needed to determine recommendations for policy and practice, our experience suggests that some engagement between the two groups is mutually beneficial. Finally, our experience highlights the recognition that evidence of effectiveness is essential but by no means sufficient to guide decisions on recommendations. Programmatic and implementation considerations are important to guide decision making and the evidence basis for this may be limited; therefore, it is essential that groups involved in delivering interventions to populations are also engaged in the guidelines process.
本文介绍了Cochrane协作网对世界卫生组织营养指南项目的背景及贡献。通过推荐分级、评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法对证据质量进行评估而增强的系统评价,构成了世界卫生组织指南的证据基础。我们共同合作的经验凸显了一些具有挑战性的问题,比如在为证据综合选择合适问题时所做的决策,以及纳入研究类型的性质,特别是关于是否将检索范围扩展至随机研究之外的决策。尽管证据综合所需的技能和经验与确定政策及实践建议所需的不同,但我们的经验表明,两组之间的一些互动是互利的。最后,我们的经验凸显了这样一种认识,即有效性证据至关重要,但绝非足以指导建议决策。项目和实施方面的考量对于指导决策很重要,而其证据基础可能有限;因此,参与向人群提供干预措施的团体也参与指南制定过程至关重要。