Department of Nutritional Sciences,University of Surrey,Guildford GU1 7XH,UK.
Proc Nutr Soc. 2017 Aug;76(3):392-399. doi: 10.1017/S0029665117000349. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
The role of vitamin D in supporting the growth and maintenance of the skeleton is robust; with recent research also suggesting a beneficial link between vitamin D and other non-skeletal health outcomes, including immune function, cardiovascular health and cancer. Despite this, vitamin D deficiency remains a global public health issue, with a renewed focus in the UK following the publication of Public Health England's new Dietary Vitamin D Requirements. Natural sources of vitamin D (dietary and UVB exposure) are limited, and thus mechanisms are needed to allow individuals to achieve the new dietary recommendations. Mandatory or voluntary vitamin D food fortification may be one of the mechanisms to increase dietary vitamin D intakes and subsequently improve vitamin D status. However, for the food industry and public to make informed decisions, clarity is needed as to whether vitamins D2 and D3 are equally effective at raising total 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations as the evidence thus far is inconsistent. This review summarises the evidence to date behind the comparative efficacy of vitamins D2 and D3 at raising 25(OH)D concentrations, and the potential role of vitamin D food fortification as a public health policy to support attainment of dietary recommendations in the UK. The comparative efficacy of vitamins D2 and D3 has been investigated in several intervention trials, with most indicating that vitamin D3 is more effective at raising 25(OH)D concentrations. However, flaws in study designs (predominantly under powering) mean there remains a need for a large, robust randomised-controlled trial to provide conclusive evidence, which the future publication of the D2-D3 Study should provide (BBSRC DRINC funded: BB/I006192/1). This review also highlights outstanding questions and gaps in the research that need to be addressed to ensure the most efficacious and safe vitamin D food fortification practices are put in place. This further research, alongside cost, availability and ethical considerations (vitamin D3 is not suitable for vegans), will be instrumental in supporting government, decision-makers, industry and consumers in making informed choices about potential future vitamin D policy and practice.
维生素 D 在支持骨骼生长和维持方面发挥着重要作用;最近的研究还表明,维生素 D 与其他非骨骼健康结果之间存在有益联系,包括免疫功能、心血管健康和癌症。尽管如此,维生素 D 缺乏仍然是一个全球性的公共卫生问题,在英国公共卫生英格兰发布新的膳食维生素 D 需求后,人们对其重新关注。维生素 D 的天然来源(饮食和 UVB 暴露)有限,因此需要一些机制来使个体能够达到新的饮食建议。强制性或自愿性的维生素 D 食品强化可能是增加饮食中维生素 D 摄入量并随后改善维生素 D 状况的一种机制。然而,为了使食品行业和公众能够做出明智的决策,需要明确维生素 D2 和 D3 是否同样有效地提高总 25-羟维生素 D(25(OH)D)浓度,因为到目前为止,证据并不一致。本综述总结了迄今为止关于维生素 D2 和 D3 提高 25(OH)D 浓度的相对效力的证据,以及维生素 D 食品强化作为支持英国实现饮食建议的公共卫生政策的潜在作用。已经在几项干预试验中研究了维生素 D2 和 D3 的相对效力,大多数研究表明维生素 D3 更有效地提高 25(OH)D 浓度。然而,研究设计的缺陷(主要是功率不足)意味着仍然需要一项大型、稳健的随机对照试验来提供确凿的证据,未来 D2-D3 研究的发表(BBSRC DRINC 资助:BB/I006192/1)应该提供这一证据。本综述还强调了研究中需要解决的悬而未决的问题和差距,以确保采取最有效和安全的维生素 D 食品强化措施。这项进一步的研究,以及成本、可用性和伦理考虑因素(维生素 D3 不适合素食者),将有助于政府、决策者、行业和消费者就未来潜在的维生素 D 政策和实践做出明智的选择。