Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Prince Charles Hospital, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Centre for Dietetic Research, School of Human Movement Studies, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Feb;62(2):237-43. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12648. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
To evaluate the performance of commonly applied nutrition screening tools and measures and to consider the potential costs of undiagnosed malnutrition in a case-based reimbursement funding environment.
A diagnostic accuracy study to compare a variety of nutrition screening techniques against primary, secondary, and comparative measures of nutritional status.
Public metropolitan hospital orthogeriatric unit.
Individuals with acute hip fracture admitted to the orthogeriatric unit; 150 prospective, consecutively admitted individuals were considered, with eight exclusions, yielding a sample size of 142 participants.
Screens included the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form, Malnutrition Screening Tool, Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, Nutrition Risk Screen 2002, anthropometric measures, and albumin. Malnutrition was diagnosed using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health Related Problems, Tenth Edition, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM) criteria. Healthcare coders costed malnutrition-related diagnostic related groups and cost-weight changes for individual participants.
Malnutrition prevalence was 48%. Screening tools had only slight to moderate agreement with ICD-10-AM diagnosis of malnutrition, and none of the screening tools tested met the a priori requirement of 80% sensitivity and 60% specificity. The estimated cost effect of poor screening tool sensitivity on a 16-bed hip fracture unit ranged from AUS$46,506 to AUS$228,896 per year.
Poor screening tool sensitivity leads to undiagnosed malnutrition; tools that are quick and easy to apply are not without cost. Routine nutrition assessment should replace nutrition risk screening in hip fracture settings with a high prevalence of malnutrition reliant on case-mix funding. Further pragmatic studies are urgently required to determine whether findings apply to other elderly inpatient populations with endemic malnutrition, comorbidities, and cognitive impairment.
评估常用营养筛查工具和措施的性能,并考虑在基于病例的报销资助环境下未诊断出的营养不良的潜在成本。
一项诊断准确性研究,比较了各种营养筛查技术与营养状况的主要、次要和比较措施。
公共大都市医院骨科病房。
急性髋部骨折入住骨科病房的个体;考虑了 150 名前瞻性、连续入院的个体,其中 8 人被排除在外,得出了 142 名参与者的样本量。
筛查包括 Mini 营养评估-简短形式、营养不良筛查工具、营养不良通用筛查工具、营养风险筛查 2002、人体测量指标和白蛋白。营养不良的诊断使用国际疾病分类和相关健康问题第十版澳大利亚修改版(ICD-10-AM)标准。医疗保健编码员对与营养不良相关的诊断相关组(DRG)和个别参与者的成本权重变化进行了成本核算。
营养不良的患病率为 48%。筛查工具与 ICD-10-AM 诊断营养不良的一致性仅为轻微到中度,没有一种筛查工具符合预先设定的 80%敏感性和 60%特异性要求。在一个有 16 张髋部骨折床位的单位中,较差的筛查工具敏感性对成本效果的估计范围为每年 46506 至 228896 澳元。
较差的筛查工具敏感性导致未诊断出的营养不良;快速简便的工具并非没有成本。在依赖病例组合资金的营养不良患病率较高的髋部骨折环境中,应常规进行营养评估,以取代营养风险筛查。迫切需要进一步进行实用研究,以确定这些发现是否适用于其他患有地方性营养不良、合并症和认知障碍的老年住院患者人群。