Pelham William E, Burrows-MacLean Lisa, Gnagy Elizabeth M, Fabiano Gregory A, Coles Erika K, Wymbs Brian T, Chacko Anil, Walker Kathryn S, Wymbs Frances, Garefino Allison, Hoffman Martin T, Waxmonsky James G, Waschbusch Daniel A
Psychology and Psychiatry, Center for Children and Families MMC, Florida International University, AHC 1 Rm 146, 11200 SW 8th Street, Miami, FL, 33199, USA,
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2014 Aug;42(6):1019-31. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9843-8.
Placebo and three doses of methylphenidate (MPH) were crossed with 3 levels of behavioral modification (no behavioral modification, NBM; low-intensity behavioral modification, LBM; and high-intensity behavior modification, HBM) in the context of a summer treatment program (STP). Participants were 48 children with ADHD, aged 5-12. Behavior was examined in a variety of social settings (sports activities, art class, lunch) that are typical of elementary school, neighborhood, and after-school settings. Children received each behavioral condition for 3 weeks, order counterbalanced across groups. Children concurrently received in random order placebo, 0.15 mg/kg/dose, 0.3 mg/kg/dose, or 0.6 mg/kg/dose MPH, 3 times daily with dose manipulated on a daily basis in random order for each child. Both behavioral and medication treatments produced highly significant and positive effects on children's behavior. The treatment modalities also interacted significantly. Whereas there was a linear dose-response curve for medication in NBM, the dose-response curves flattened considerably in LBM and HBM. Behavior modification produced effects as large as moderate doses, and on some measures, high doses of medication. These results replicate and extend to social-recreational settings previously reported results in a classroom setting from the same sample (Fabiano et al., School Psychology Review, 36, 195-216, 2007). Results illustrate the importance of taking dosage/intensity into account when evaluating combined treatments; there were no benefits of combined treatments when the dosage of either treatment was high but combination of the low-dose treatments produced substantial incremental improvement over unimodal treatment.
在一个暑期治疗项目(STP)中,安慰剂和三种剂量的哌甲酯(MPH)与三种行为矫正水平(无行为矫正,NBM;低强度行为矫正,LBM;高强度行为矫正,HBM)进行交叉实验。参与者为48名患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的5至12岁儿童。在小学、社区及课后环境中常见的各种社交场合(体育活动、艺术课、午餐)对行为进行观察。每个行为条件下儿童接受为期3周的实验,各实验组的实验顺序相互平衡。儿童同时随机接受安慰剂、0.15毫克/千克/剂量、0.3毫克/千克/剂量或0.6毫克/千克/剂量的MPH,每天3次,每个儿童的剂量每天随机安排。行为治疗和药物治疗均对儿童行为产生了高度显著的积极影响。两种治疗方式之间也存在显著的交互作用。在无行为矫正(NBM)组中,药物呈现线性剂量反应曲线,而在低强度行为矫正(LBM)组和高强度行为矫正(HBM)组中,剂量反应曲线明显变平。行为矫正产生的效果与中等剂量药物相当,在某些指标上,与高剂量药物效果相同。这些结果重复并扩展了之前在同一样本的课堂环境中所报告的结果(Fabiano等人,《学校心理学评论》,36卷,195 - 216页,2007年),将其应用到了社交娱乐环境中。结果表明在评估联合治疗时考虑剂量/强度的重要性;当任何一种治疗的剂量较高时,联合治疗并无益处,但低剂量治疗的联合使用比单一治疗产生了显著的增量改善。