Pelham William E, Fabiano Gregory A, Waxmonsky James G, Greiner Andrew R, Gnagy Elizabeth M, Pelham William E, Coxe Stefany, Verley Jessica, Bhatia Ira, Hart Katie, Karch Kathryn, Konijnendijk Evelien, Tresco Katy, Nahum-Shani Inbal, Murphy Susan A
a Center for Children and Families, Department of Psychology , Florida International University.
b Department of Counseling, School, and Educational Psychology , State University of New York at Buffalo.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2016 Jul-Aug;45(4):396-415. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2015.1105138. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
Behavioral and pharmacological treatments for children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were evaluated to address whether endpoint outcomes are better depending on which treatment is initiated first and, in case of insufficient response to initial treatment, whether increasing dose of initial treatment or adding the other treatment modality is superior. Children with ADHD (ages 5-12, N = 146, 76% male) were treated for 1 school year. Children were randomized to initiate treatment with low doses of either (a) behavioral parent training (8 group sessions) and brief teacher consultation to establish a Daily Report Card or (b) extended-release methylphenidate (equivalent to .15 mg/kg/dose bid). After 8 weeks or at later monthly intervals as necessary, insufficient responders were rerandomized to secondary interventions that either increased the dose/intensity of the initial treatment or added the other treatment modality, with adaptive adjustments monthly as needed to these secondary treatments. The group beginning with behavioral treatment displayed significantly lower rates of observed classroom rule violations (the primary outcome) at study endpoint and tended to have fewer out-of-class disciplinary events. Further, adding medication secondary to initial behavior modification resulted in better outcomes on the primary outcomes and parent/teacher ratings of oppositional behavior than adding behavior modification to initial medication. Normalization rates on teacher and parent ratings were generally high. Parents who began treatment with behavioral parent training had substantially better attendance than those assigned to receive training following medication. Beginning treatment with behavioral intervention produced better outcomes overall than beginning treatment with medication.
对患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童的行为和药物治疗进行了评估,以确定终点结果是否因首先开始哪种治疗而更好,以及在对初始治疗反应不足的情况下,增加初始治疗剂量或添加另一种治疗方式是否更具优势。患有ADHD的儿童(年龄5至12岁,N = 146,76%为男性)接受了1个学年的治疗。儿童被随机分为两组,分别开始低剂量治疗:(a)行为家长培训(8次小组课程)和简短的教师咨询以建立每日报告卡,或(b)缓释哌甲酯(相当于0.15毫克/千克/剂量,每日两次)。8周后或必要时在随后的每月间隔时间,反应不足的患者被重新随机分配到二级干预组,二级干预要么增加初始治疗的剂量/强度,要么添加另一种治疗方式,并根据需要每月对这些二级治疗进行适应性调整。以行为治疗开始的组在研究终点时观察到的课堂违规率(主要结果)显著较低,并且课外违纪事件往往较少。此外,在初始行为矫正后添加药物治疗在主要结果以及家长/教师对对立行为的评分方面比在初始药物治疗后添加行为矫正产生更好的结果。教师和家长评分的正常化率普遍较高。以行为家长培训开始治疗的家长的出勤率比被分配在药物治疗后接受培训的家长高得多。以行为干预开始治疗总体上比以药物治疗开始治疗产生更好的结果。