Eglen D E, Ulbright T M
Am J Clin Pathol. 1987 Sep;88(3):328-32. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/88.3.328.
Yolk sac tumor and seminoma may have a similar appearance in focal areas. Small biopsies may therefore be difficult to interpret. The authors studied 20 yolk sac tumors and 21 seminomas to investigate the utility of immunohistochemical markers in this differential diagnosis. All yolk sac tumors stained positively for cytokeratin (CK) but so did 43% of seminomas. The CK positivity of yolk sac tumors was generally more diffuse and intense, however, there was an overlap in the spectrum of intensity of CK positivity in yolk sac tumor and seminoma. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) was a less sensitive (55%) marker for yolk sac tumor than CK, but AFP was quite specific in this differential diagnosis because no seminoma stained for AFP. Alpha-1-antitrypsin was not a very useful marker because of poor sensitivity and specificity. The interpretation of light microscopic patterns remains of paramount importance in the differentiation of solid yolk sac tumor from seminoma.
卵黄囊瘤和精原细胞瘤在局部区域可能有相似的表现。因此,小活检标本可能难以解读。作者研究了20例卵黄囊瘤和21例精原细胞瘤,以探讨免疫组化标志物在这种鉴别诊断中的应用价值。所有卵黄囊瘤细胞角蛋白(CK)染色均为阳性,但43%的精原细胞瘤也呈阳性。然而,卵黄囊瘤的CK阳性通常更弥漫且更强,不过卵黄囊瘤和精原细胞瘤的CK阳性强度范围存在重叠。甲胎蛋白(AFP)作为卵黄囊瘤的标志物,其敏感性低于CK(55%),但AFP在这种鉴别诊断中相当特异,因为没有精原细胞瘤AFP染色阳性。α1抗胰蛋白酶不是一个非常有用的标志物,因为其敏感性和特异性都较差。在实体性卵黄囊瘤与精原细胞瘤的鉴别中,光镜下形态的解读仍然至关重要。