Suppr超能文献

哪些因素影响女性进行癌症基因检测的决定?

What Factors Impact upon a Woman's Decision to Undertake Genetic Cancer Testing?

机构信息

North Metropolitan Health Service, Western Australian Department of Health , Perth, WA , Australia ; Institute of Health Research, University of Notre Dame Australia , Fremantle, WA , Australia.

Institute of Health Research, University of Notre Dame Australia , Fremantle, WA , Australia.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2014 Jan 6;3:325. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00325.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The advent of human genome project has lead to genetic tests that identify high-risk states for certain cancers. Many are privately marketed on the Internet. Despite the availability of tests, limited data has evaluated factors that lead to test uptake. The aim of the present study was to explore the attitudes of a cohort of new mothers toward uptake of a genetic cancer test with a 50% predictive value of cancer.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was undertaken. The project targeted women who had recently given birth at an Australian tertiary referral hospital. Women were asked about a theoretical blood test that detected an increased risk for the development of cancer. Attitudes and knowledge questionnaires were completed.

RESULTS

Of 232 consecutive women approached, 32 declined, giving a response rate of 86.2%. Only 63 (31.5%) women stated they would have the test. Absence of religious belief, higher level of education, better knowledge of terms used in genetics, an absence of concern over emotional, employment, and insurance discrimination, and previous acceptance of Down syndrome screening in pregnancy were each associated with significantly higher rate of test uptake in univariate analysis (all p < 0.03). In multivariate analysis, a lack of concern over discrimination and a history of having accepted Down syndrome screening in the previous pregnancy remained significantly associated with test uptake (all p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Concern over discrimination and having made a prior decision to have genetic testing were the principal factors associated with decision-making.

摘要

简介

人类基因组计划的出现带来了能够识别某些癌症高危状态的基因检测。许多此类检测在互联网上进行私人营销。尽管有这些检测可供使用,但评估导致检测采用的因素的数据有限。本研究的目的是探讨一组新妈妈对具有 50%癌症预测价值的癌症基因检测的态度。

方法

进行了一项横断面调查。该项目针对的是澳大利亚一家三级转诊医院最近分娩的女性。女性被问及一项理论上可以检测癌症发展风险增加的血液检测。完成了态度和知识问卷。

结果

在 232 名连续接触的女性中,有 32 名拒绝了,应答率为 86.2%。只有 63 名(31.5%)女性表示她们会接受检测。缺乏宗教信仰、较高的教育水平、更好地理解遗传学中使用的术语、不担心情感、就业和保险歧视,以及以前在怀孕期间接受唐氏综合征筛查,这些在单因素分析中都与更高的检测采用率显著相关(均 p<0.03)。在多因素分析中,不担心歧视和以前在怀孕期间接受唐氏综合征筛查的历史与检测采用率显著相关(均 p<0.0001)。

结论

对歧视的关注和以前决定进行基因检测是与决策相关的主要因素。

相似文献

1
What Factors Impact upon a Woman's Decision to Undertake Genetic Cancer Testing?
Front Oncol. 2014 Jan 6;3:325. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00325.
2
Women's Attitudes Toward Invasive and Noninvasive Testing When Facing a High Risk of Fetal Down Syndrome.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e191062. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1062.
4
Attitudes of women of childbearing age towards prenatal diagnosis in southeastern France.
Prenat Diagn. 1993 Jul;13(7):613-27. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970130712.
5
Factors affecting mothers' knowledge of genetic screening.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Feb;44(1):30-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00171.x.
6
Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jul;33(7):736-750. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34961-1.
7
Attitudes of new mothers towards genetics and newborn screening.
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Mar;27(1):67-72. doi: 10.1080/01674820500420652.
10
A survey of the knowledge and attitudes of pregnant Thai women towards Down syndrome screening.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009 Oct;35(5):876-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2009.01035.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of personal cancer history and genomic risk information on mothers' psychological adaptation to inherited breast/ovarian cancer syndrome.
Psychol Health Med. 2025 Feb;30(2):297-308. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2024.2417311. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
2
Community concerns about genetic discrimination in life insurance persist in Australia: A survey of consumers offered genetic testing.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Mar;32(3):286-294. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01373-1. Epub 2023 May 11.
5
Massively Parallel Sequencing for Rare Genetic Disorders: Potential and Pitfalls.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Feb 19;11:628946. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.628946. eCollection 2020.
6
Stakeholder Perspectives on Overcoming Barriers to Cascade Testing in Lynch Syndrome: A Qualitative Study.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Dec;13(12):1037-1046. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0141. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
8
Breast Cancer Genetics Knowledge and Testing Intentions among Nigerian Professional Women.
J Genet Couns. 2018 Aug;27(4):863-873. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0194-4. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
9
Precision medicine: opportunities, possibilities, and challenges for patients and providers.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jul;23(4):787-90. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv215. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
10
Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review.
J Hum Genet. 2016 Apr;61(4):275-82. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2015.151. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic discrimination and life insurance: a systematic review of the evidence.
BMC Med. 2013 Jan 31;11:25. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-25.
2
Attitudes and beliefs of African-Americans toward genetics, genetic testing, and sickle cell disease education and awareness.
J Genet Couns. 2011 Dec;20(6):572-92. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9388-3. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
3
Are adolescents' decisions about prenatal screening for Down syndrome informed? A controlled, prospective study.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2011 Feb;24(1):29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
4
Psychosocial aspects of genetic testing.
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;22(2):218-23. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283252d80.
5
Women who are well informed about prenatal genetic screening delay emotional attachment to their fetus.
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Mar;30(1):34-41. doi: 10.1080/01674820802292130.
6
Fear of health insurance loss among individuals at risk for Huntington disease.
Am J Med Genet A. 2008 Aug 15;146A(16):2070-7. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32422.
8
A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing.
Genet Med. 2008 Jan;10(1):19-32. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31815f524f.
10
Living with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer; experiences from and impact of genetic testing.
J Genet Couns. 2007 Dec;16(6):811-20. doi: 10.1007/s10897-007-9117-0. Epub 2007 Aug 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验