• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪些因素影响女性进行癌症基因检测的决定?

What Factors Impact upon a Woman's Decision to Undertake Genetic Cancer Testing?

机构信息

North Metropolitan Health Service, Western Australian Department of Health , Perth, WA , Australia ; Institute of Health Research, University of Notre Dame Australia , Fremantle, WA , Australia.

Institute of Health Research, University of Notre Dame Australia , Fremantle, WA , Australia.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2014 Jan 6;3:325. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00325.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2013.00325
PMID:24432248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3880931/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The advent of human genome project has lead to genetic tests that identify high-risk states for certain cancers. Many are privately marketed on the Internet. Despite the availability of tests, limited data has evaluated factors that lead to test uptake. The aim of the present study was to explore the attitudes of a cohort of new mothers toward uptake of a genetic cancer test with a 50% predictive value of cancer.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was undertaken. The project targeted women who had recently given birth at an Australian tertiary referral hospital. Women were asked about a theoretical blood test that detected an increased risk for the development of cancer. Attitudes and knowledge questionnaires were completed.

RESULTS

Of 232 consecutive women approached, 32 declined, giving a response rate of 86.2%. Only 63 (31.5%) women stated they would have the test. Absence of religious belief, higher level of education, better knowledge of terms used in genetics, an absence of concern over emotional, employment, and insurance discrimination, and previous acceptance of Down syndrome screening in pregnancy were each associated with significantly higher rate of test uptake in univariate analysis (all p < 0.03). In multivariate analysis, a lack of concern over discrimination and a history of having accepted Down syndrome screening in the previous pregnancy remained significantly associated with test uptake (all p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Concern over discrimination and having made a prior decision to have genetic testing were the principal factors associated with decision-making.

摘要

简介

人类基因组计划的出现带来了能够识别某些癌症高危状态的基因检测。许多此类检测在互联网上进行私人营销。尽管有这些检测可供使用,但评估导致检测采用的因素的数据有限。本研究的目的是探讨一组新妈妈对具有 50%癌症预测价值的癌症基因检测的态度。

方法

进行了一项横断面调查。该项目针对的是澳大利亚一家三级转诊医院最近分娩的女性。女性被问及一项理论上可以检测癌症发展风险增加的血液检测。完成了态度和知识问卷。

结果

在 232 名连续接触的女性中,有 32 名拒绝了,应答率为 86.2%。只有 63 名(31.5%)女性表示她们会接受检测。缺乏宗教信仰、较高的教育水平、更好地理解遗传学中使用的术语、不担心情感、就业和保险歧视,以及以前在怀孕期间接受唐氏综合征筛查,这些在单因素分析中都与更高的检测采用率显著相关(均 p<0.03)。在多因素分析中,不担心歧视和以前在怀孕期间接受唐氏综合征筛查的历史与检测采用率显著相关(均 p<0.0001)。

结论

对歧视的关注和以前决定进行基因检测是与决策相关的主要因素。

相似文献

1
What Factors Impact upon a Woman's Decision to Undertake Genetic Cancer Testing?哪些因素影响女性进行癌症基因检测的决定?
Front Oncol. 2014 Jan 6;3:325. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00325.
2
Women's Attitudes Toward Invasive and Noninvasive Testing When Facing a High Risk of Fetal Down Syndrome.当面临胎儿唐氏综合征高风险时,女性对有创性和非侵入性检测的态度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e191062. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1062.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Attitudes of women of childbearing age towards prenatal diagnosis in southeastern France.法国东南部育龄妇女对产前诊断的态度。
Prenat Diagn. 1993 Jul;13(7):613-27. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970130712.
5
Factors affecting mothers' knowledge of genetic screening.影响母亲对基因筛查了解程度的因素。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Feb;44(1):30-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00171.x.
6
Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.单胎妊娠胎儿非整倍体的产前筛查。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jul;33(7):736-750. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34961-1.
7
Attitudes of new mothers towards genetics and newborn screening.初为人母者对遗传学及新生儿筛查的态度。
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Mar;27(1):67-72. doi: 10.1080/01674820500420652.
8
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.
9
Attitude towards and factors affecting uptake of population-based BRCA testing in the Ashkenazi Jewish population: a cohort study.基于人群的 BRCA 检测在阿什肯纳兹犹太人群体中的接受态度和影响因素:一项队列研究。
BJOG. 2019 May;126(6):784-794. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15654. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
10
A survey of the knowledge and attitudes of pregnant Thai women towards Down syndrome screening.泰国孕妇对唐氏综合征筛查的知识和态度调查。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009 Oct;35(5):876-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2009.01035.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of personal cancer history and genomic risk information on mothers' psychological adaptation to inherited breast/ovarian cancer syndrome.个人癌症病史和基因组风险信息对母亲遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌综合征心理适应的影响。
Psychol Health Med. 2025 Feb;30(2):297-308. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2024.2417311. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
2
Community concerns about genetic discrimination in life insurance persist in Australia: A survey of consumers offered genetic testing.澳大利亚的消费者在提供基因检测后,对寿险中的基因歧视仍存在担忧:一项消费者调查。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Mar;32(3):286-294. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01373-1. Epub 2023 May 11.
3
Factors Associated with the Uptake of Genetic Testing for Cancer Risks: A Pathway Analysis Using the Health Information National Trends Survey Data.与癌症风险基因检测接受情况相关的因素:一项使用健康信息国家趋势调查数据的路径分析
Life (Basel). 2022 Dec 4;12(12):2024. doi: 10.3390/life12122024.
4
Study protocol: the Australian genetics and life insurance moratorium-monitoring the effectiveness and response (A-GLIMMER) project.研究方案:澳大利亚遗传学与寿险暂缓—监测效果与反应(A-GLIMMER)项目。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 May 21;22(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00634-2.
5
Massively Parallel Sequencing for Rare Genetic Disorders: Potential and Pitfalls.大规模平行测序在罕见遗传病中的应用:潜在价值与陷阱。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Feb 19;11:628946. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.628946. eCollection 2020.
6
Stakeholder Perspectives on Overcoming Barriers to Cascade Testing in Lynch Syndrome: A Qualitative Study.利益相关者对克服林奇综合征级联检测障碍的观点:一项定性研究。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Dec;13(12):1037-1046. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0141. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
7
Psychosocial, attitudinal, and demographic correlates of cancer-related germline genetic testing in the 2017 Health Information National Trends Survey.2017年健康信息国家趋势调查中癌症相关种系基因检测的心理社会、态度和人口统计学相关因素。
J Community Genet. 2019 Oct;10(4):453-459. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-00405-4. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
8
Breast Cancer Genetics Knowledge and Testing Intentions among Nigerian Professional Women.尼日利亚职业女性的乳腺癌遗传学知识与检测意愿
J Genet Couns. 2018 Aug;27(4):863-873. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0194-4. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
9
Precision medicine: opportunities, possibilities, and challenges for patients and providers.精准医学:给患者和医疗服务提供者带来的机遇、可能性与挑战。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jul;23(4):787-90. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv215. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
10
Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review.全球对遗传歧视的恐惧和担忧趋势:系统文献综述。
J Hum Genet. 2016 Apr;61(4):275-82. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2015.151. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic discrimination and life insurance: a systematic review of the evidence.遗传歧视与寿险:证据的系统回顾。
BMC Med. 2013 Jan 31;11:25. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-25.
2
Attitudes and beliefs of African-Americans toward genetics, genetic testing, and sickle cell disease education and awareness.非裔美国人对遗传学、基因检测以及镰状细胞病教育与认知的态度和信念。
J Genet Couns. 2011 Dec;20(6):572-92. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9388-3. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
3
Are adolescents' decisions about prenatal screening for Down syndrome informed? A controlled, prospective study.青少年对唐氏综合征产前筛查的决策是否明智?一项对照前瞻性研究。
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2011 Feb;24(1):29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
4
Psychosocial aspects of genetic testing.基因检测的社会心理层面
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;22(2):218-23. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283252d80.
5
Women who are well informed about prenatal genetic screening delay emotional attachment to their fetus.对产前基因筛查有充分了解的女性会延迟对胎儿的情感依恋。
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Mar;30(1):34-41. doi: 10.1080/01674820802292130.
6
Fear of health insurance loss among individuals at risk for Huntington disease.亨廷顿病高危个体对失去医疗保险的恐惧。
Am J Med Genet A. 2008 Aug 15;146A(16):2070-7. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32422.
7
Familial disease with a risk of sudden death: a longitudinal study of the psychological consequences of predictive testing for long QT syndrome.具有猝死风险的家族性疾病:一项关于长QT综合征预测性检测心理后果的纵向研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2008 May;5(5):719-24. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.01.032. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
8
A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing.一项关于基因检测的感知风险、心理及行为影响的系统评价
Genet Med. 2008 Jan;10(1):19-32. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31815f524f.
9
Colorectal cancer survivors undergoing genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: motivational factors and psychosocial functioning.接受遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌基因检测的结直肠癌幸存者:动机因素与心理社会功能
Clin Genet. 2007 Nov;72(5):394-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00893.x. Epub 2007 Sep 24.
10
Living with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer; experiences from and impact of genetic testing.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌患者的生活;基因检测的经历与影响
J Genet Couns. 2007 Dec;16(6):811-20. doi: 10.1007/s10897-007-9117-0. Epub 2007 Aug 18.