Sucher Robert, Resch Thomas, Mohr Elisabeth, Perathoner Alexander, Biebl Matthias, Pratschke Johann, Mittermair Reinhard
Department of Visceral, Transplant, and Thoracic Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University , Innsbruck, Austria .
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Feb;24(2):83-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0250. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
Through efficacy and improved safety, multiport laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LAPS-G) has emerged as an important and broadly available treatment option for people with severe and complex obesity. Because a single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILS-G) would be less invasive, we applied this novel surgical technique for a selected number of patients enrolled into our minimally invasive bariatric program.
A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from 80 morbidly obese patients who qualified for SILS-G or LAPS-G was performed from January 2011 to May 2012.
SILS-G and LAPS-G were performed in 40 patients, respectively. All patients were female. Mean age was 41 (range, 19-73) years (SILS-G, 37 [19-62] years; LAPS-G, 43 [24-73] years; P=not significant). Preoperative body mass index was 40.8 (35.1-45.0) kg/m(2) in the SILS-G group and 43.8 (35.0-47.8) kg/m(2) in the LAPS-G group (P=not significant). Total operative time was significantly lower in the SILS-G group (85±21 minutes) compared with the LAPS-G group (97±26 minutes) (P<.05). Median percentage excess weight loss was comparable in both groups (SILS-G, 57.2%; LAPS-G, 53.7%) at 6.6 months after surgery. Mean hospital stay was 5 days (SILS-G, 5 [4-24] days; LAPS-G, 6 [4-14] days; P=not significant). Complication rates were low in both groups: leakage, 2.5% in SILS-G and 0% in LAPS-G; bleeding, 2.5% in SILS-G and 2.5% in LAPS-G; and trocar-site hernia, 0% in both groups. Patients operated on with single-incision laparoscopy had a significantly better cosmetic outcome as assessed by a scar satisfaction assessment questionnaire (P<.01).
SILS-G is a feasible and safe operative procedure that leads to a significant reduction of total operative time compared with a multiport access procedure. Further potential benefits associated with single-incision laparoscopic surgery remain to be investigated objectively.
通过疗效的提升和安全性的改善,多端口腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LAPS-G)已成为重度和复杂性肥胖患者一种重要且广泛应用的治疗选择。由于单切口腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(SILS-G)的侵入性更小,我们将这种新型手术技术应用于入选我们微创减重项目的部分患者。
对2011年1月至2012年5月期间前瞻性收集的80例符合SILS-G或LAPS-G标准的病态肥胖患者的数据进行回顾性分析。
分别对40例患者实施了SILS-G和LAPS-G手术。所有患者均为女性。平均年龄为41岁(范围19 - 73岁)(SILS-G组,37岁[19 - 62岁];LAPS-G组,43岁[24 - 73岁];P值无统计学意义)。SILS-G组术前体重指数为40.8(35.1 - 45.0)kg/m²,LAPS-G组为43.8(35.0 - 47.8)kg/m²(P值无统计学意义)。SILS-G组的总手术时间(85±21分钟)显著低于LAPS-G组(97±26分钟)(P<0.05)。术后6.6个月时,两组的中位超重体重减轻百分比相当(SILS-G组为57.2%;LAPS-G组为53.7%)。平均住院时间为5天(SILS-G组,5天[4 - 24天];LAPS-G组,6天[4 - 14天];P值无统计学意义)。两组并发症发生率均较低:吻合口漏,SILS-G组为2.5%,LAPS-G组为0%;出血,SILS-G组和LAPS-G组均为2.5%;套管针穿刺部位疝,两组均为0%。通过瘢痕满意度评估问卷评估,单切口腹腔镜手术患者的美容效果显著更好(P<0.01)。
SILS-G是一种可行且安全的手术方法,与多端口入路手术相比,可显著缩短总手术时间。单切口腹腔镜手术的其他潜在益处仍有待客观研究。