• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多端口与单端口袖状胃切除术的早期结果及并发症比较:一项随机临床研究

Comparison of Early Results and Complications between Multi-and Single-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Clinical Study.

作者信息

Hosseini Seyed Vahid, Hosseini Seyed Ali, Al-Hurry Ahmed Mohammed Ali Hussein, Khazraei Hajar, Ganji Fatemeh, Sadeghi Fatemeh

机构信息

Colorectal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Department of Surgery, Najaf University of Medical Sciences, Kerbala, Iraq.

出版信息

Iran J Med Sci. 2017 May;42(3):251-257.

PMID:28533573
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5429493/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recent years, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become more acceptable for obese patients. Single-port sleeve gastrectomy (SPSG) is more popular since each abdominal incision carries the risk of bleeding, hernia, and internal organ injury as well as exponentially affecting cosmesis. This cross-sectional study aimed at comparing multi-port sleeve gastrectomy (MPSG) and SPSG in terms of their early results and complications.

METHODS

Out of129 obese patients candidated for LSG, 102 patients were assigned to 2 groups of SPSG and MPSG. Complications and demographic data such as body mass index (BMI), age, gender, operation time, and hospital stay were measured. All surgeries were carried out between2013 and 2015 in Shiraz, Iran. Data analysis was performed using SPSS, version 16 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The continuous and categorical variables were compared using the Student -test and the Chi-square test or the Fisher exact test, respectively.

RESULTS

The patients' data from both groups were similar in terms of age, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding volume, and length of hospital stay. Mean BMI was 42.8±0.7 in the SPSG group and 45.3±1.2 in the MPSG group. Duration of surgery was significantly lower in the SPSG group (P<0.001). Only 1 patient from the SPSG group and 5 patients from the MPSG group had bleeding as an early complication.

CONCLUSION

The differences in each complication between the groups were not statistically significant. SPSG seems to be safe and is the same as MPSG in terms of major postoperative complications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

IRCT201512229936N12 The abstract was presented in the 4 International Congress of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Iran, as a poster and published in as a supplement (May 2015; Vol. 40, No. 3).

摘要

背景

近年来,腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)已为肥胖患者所更广泛接受。单孔袖状胃切除术(SPSG)更受欢迎,因为每个腹部切口都有出血、疝气和内脏损伤的风险,并且对美观有极大影响。本横断面研究旨在比较多端口袖状胃切除术(MPSG)和SPSG的早期结果及并发症。

方法

在129例符合LSG条件的肥胖患者中,102例患者被分为SPSG和MPSG两组。测量并发症及人口统计学数据,如体重指数(BMI)、年龄、性别、手术时间和住院时间。所有手术于2013年至2015年在伊朗设拉子进行。使用适用于Windows的SPSS 16版软件(SPSS公司,伊利诺伊州芝加哥)进行数据分析。连续变量和分类变量分别使用Student检验和卡方检验或Fisher精确检验进行比较。

结果

两组患者在年龄、术中及术后出血量和住院时间方面的数据相似。SPSG组的平均BMI为42.8±0.7,MPSG组为45.3±1.2。SPSG组的手术时间明显更短(P<0.001)。SPSG组仅有1例患者、MPSG组有5例患者出现出血这一早期并发症。

结论

两组间每种并发症的差异无统计学意义。SPSG似乎是安全的,在主要术后并发症方面与MPSG相同。

试验注册号

IRCT201512229936N12 该摘要在伊朗第四届微创外科学国际大会上以海报形式展示,并于2015年5月作为增刊发表(第40卷,第3期)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04bf/5429493/fe5f9a849241/IJMS-42-251-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04bf/5429493/fe5f9a849241/IJMS-42-251-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04bf/5429493/fe5f9a849241/IJMS-42-251-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Early Results and Complications between Multi-and Single-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Clinical Study.多端口与单端口袖状胃切除术的早期结果及并发症比较:一项随机临床研究
Iran J Med Sci. 2017 May;42(3):251-257.
2
Routine gastric suspension technique in single-port sleeve gastrectomy procedure.单孔套管胃切除术的常规胃悬吊技术。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9651-9657. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10502-2. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
3
Single port sleeve gastrectomy: strategic use of technology to re-establish fundamental tenets of multiport laparoscopy.单孔套管胃切除术:技术的巧妙运用使多孔腹腔镜技术重新回到基本原则。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 Jul-Aug;8(4):450-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
4
Single-port sleeve gastrectomy for super-obese patients.针对超级肥胖患者的单孔袖状胃切除术。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Mar-Apr;12(3):522-527. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
5
Short-term results of single-port sleeve gastrectomy in adolescents with severe obesity.青少年重度肥胖患者单孔袖状胃切除术的短期结果
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Jan-Feb;11(1):65-9. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.05.029. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
6
Single-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a routine procedure in 1000 patients.单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术作为1000例患者的常规手术
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Aug;12(7):1270-1277. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
7
Retrospective Comparison of Single-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Three-Port Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Propensity Score Adjustment Analysis.单孔袖状胃切除术与三孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的回顾性比较:倾向评分调整分析。
Obes Surg. 2018 Jul;28(7):2105-2112. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3244-6.
8
Routine single-port sleeve gastrectomy: a study of 60 consecutive patients.常规单孔袖状胃切除术:连续 60 例患者的研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013 May-Jun;9(3):385-9. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2012.01.023. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
9
Does single-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy result in improved short-term perioperative outcomes compared to conventional multi-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy?单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与传统多孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术相比,是否能改善短期围手术期结局?
Int J Surg. 2015 Oct;22:67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.08.015. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
10
Frequency of Early Complications of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Using Four Ports.使用四孔法行腹腔镜袖状胃切除术早期并发症的发生率
Cureus. 2024 Jul 28;16(7):e65613. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65613. eCollection 2024 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
Reduced Port Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.缩小切口腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2024 Dec;34(12):4519-4530. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07555-0. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
2
Single Incision Versus Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.单切口与传统多端口腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:荟萃分析与系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Oct 13;15(10):e46956. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46956. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Midline incisional hernia guidelines: the European Hernia Society.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity in 3003 Patients: Results at a High-Volume Bariatric Center.3003例病态肥胖患者的腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:一家高容量减肥中心的结果
Obes Surg. 2016 Sep;26(9):2045-2050. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2063-x.
2
Metabolic syndrome and its associated risk factors in Iranian adults: A systematic review.伊朗成年人的代谢综合征及其相关危险因素:一项系统综述。
Caspian J Intern Med. 2015 Spring;6(2):51-61.
3
Bariatric Surgery Worldwide 2013.《2013年全球减肥手术》
中线切口疝指南:欧洲疝学会
Br J Surg. 2023 Nov 9;110(12):1732-1768. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad284.
4
Adiponectin and leptin levels of patients after sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass surgeries.袖状胃切除术、Roux-en-Y胃旁路术和单吻合口袖状回肠旁路术后患者的脂联素和瘦素水平。
J Res Med Sci. 2023 May 29;28:42. doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_77_21. eCollection 2023.
5
Safety and effectiveness of reduced-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Asian morbidly obese patients.减少端口腹腔镜袖状胃切除术在亚洲病态肥胖患者中的安全性和有效性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 6;11(1):23511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02999-1.
6
Reduced-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbidly Obese Japanese Patients: a Retrospective Case-Matched Study.经脐单部位腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗病态肥胖症的临床研究 摘要:目的探讨经脐单部位腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(SILS-SG)治疗病态肥胖症的安全性和有效性。方法选取 2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月于我院接受 SILS-SG 的 52 例病态肥胖症患者为观察组,另选取同期接受传统腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)的 52 例病态肥胖症患者为对照组。比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后并发症发生率、术后 1 年的减重效果。结果观察组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间均明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者术后均未发生严重并发症,观察组的术后并发症发生率为 3.85%,明显低于对照组的 13.46%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后 1 年,两组患者的 BMI、腰围、体质量均明显下降,且观察组的下降幅度明显大于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 SILS-SG 治疗病态肥胖症安全有效,具有创伤小、恢复快、并发症少等优点,值得临床推广应用。
Obes Surg. 2019 Oct;29(10):3291-3298. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03987-1.
7
Incidence of incisional hernias following single-incision versus traditional laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis.单切口与传统腹腔镜手术后切口疝发生率的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2019 Feb;23(1):91-100. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1853-6. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
Obes Surg. 2015 Oct;25(10):1822-32. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1657-z.
4
Short-term results of single-port sleeve gastrectomy in adolescents with severe obesity.青少年重度肥胖患者单孔袖状胃切除术的短期结果
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Jan-Feb;11(1):65-9. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.05.029. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
5
Single-port laparoscopic colorectal resections in obese patients are as safe and effective as conventional laparoscopy.肥胖患者的单孔腹腔镜结直肠切除术与传统腹腔镜手术一样安全有效。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Oct;28(10):2884-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3542-6. Epub 2014 May 23.
6
Laparoscopic bariatric surgery can be performed through a single incision: a comparative study.腹腔镜减肥手术可通过单一切口进行:一项比较研究。
Obes Surg. 2014 Jul;24(7):1102-8. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1291-1.
7
Outcome of sleeve gastrectomy as a primary bariatric procedure.袖状胃切除术作为主要减重手术的结果。
Br J Surg. 2014 May;101(6):661-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9447.
8
Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus multiport laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: analysis of 80 cases in a single center.单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与多孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:单中心80例病例分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Feb;24(2):83-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0250. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
9
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy compared with other bariatric surgical procedures: a systematic review of randomized trials.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与其他减重手术的比较:随机试验的系统评价。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013 Sep-Oct;9(5):816-29. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
10
Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术
Am Surg. 2013 Apr;79(4):393-7.