• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与式实验:为能力建设设计公众参与科学和技术的活动。

Experiments in engagement: Designing public engagement with science and technology for capacity building.

机构信息

Arizona State University, USA.

University of Southern California, USA.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2017 Aug;26(6):634-649. doi: 10.1177/0963662515620970. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

DOI:10.1177/0963662515620970
PMID:26769749
Abstract

Public engagement with science and technology is now widely used in science policy and communication. Touted as a means of enhancing democratic discussion of science and technology, analysis of public engagement with science and technology has shown that it is often weakly tied to scientific governance. In this article, we suggest that the notion of capacity building might be a way of reframing the democratic potential of public engagement with science and technology activities. Drawing on literatures from public policy and administration, we outline how public engagement with science and technology might build citizen capacity, before using the notion of capacity building to develop five principles for the design of public engagement with science and technology. We demonstrate the use of these principles through a discussion of the development and realization of the pilot for a large-scale public engagement with science and technology activity, the Futurescape City Tours, which was carried out in Arizona in 2012.

摘要

现在,公众参与科学技术活动已被广泛应用于科学政策和科学传播领域。有人认为,这种活动是加强对科学技术进行民主讨论的一种手段,但对公众参与科学技术活动的分析表明,这种活动往往与科学治理的关联度很弱。在本文中,我们提出,能力建设的概念可能为重新构建公众参与科学技术活动的民主潜力提供一种途径。我们借鉴公共政策和公共行政领域的文献,概述了公众参与科学技术活动如何能够增强公民能力,然后利用能力建设的概念制定了五项公众参与科学技术活动的设计原则。我们通过讨论 2012 年在亚利桑那州开展的大型公众参与科学技术活动——未来城市之旅的试点开发和实施,展示了这些原则的应用。

相似文献

1
Experiments in engagement: Designing public engagement with science and technology for capacity building.参与式实验:为能力建设设计公众参与科学和技术的活动。
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Aug;26(6):634-649. doi: 10.1177/0963662515620970. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
2
Building the capacity for public engagement with science in the United States.在美国建立公众参与科学的能力。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):53-9. doi: 10.1177/0963662513476403.
3
From 'trust us' to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy.从“信任我们”到参与式治理:协商性公众与科学政策。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):48-52. doi: 10.1177/0963662512472160.
4
Education, outreach, and inclusive engagement: Towards integrated indicators of successful program outcomes in participatory science.教育、推广与包容性参与:迈向参与式科学中成功项目成果的综合指标
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):92-106. doi: 10.1177/0963662513494560. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
5
Reflecting on public engagement and science policy.反思公众参与和科学政策。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):27-31. doi: 10.1177/0963662513482614.
6
Unbalanced progress: The hard road from science popularisation to public engagement with science in China.不均衡的进展:中国从科学普及到公众参与科学的艰难之路。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):32-7. doi: 10.1177/0963662513476404.
7
Mundane science use in a practice theoretical perspective: Different understandings of the relations between citizen-consumers and public communication initiatives build on scientific claims.实践理论视角下的世俗科学应用:基于科学主张,对公民消费者与公共传播倡议之间关系存在不同理解。
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Jan;26(1):40-54. doi: 10.1177/0963662515596314. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
8
Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives.公民科学还是科学公民身份?厘清国家研究计划中公众参与言辞的用途。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Jun 4;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0117-1.
9
Engaging with the political imaginaries of science: Near misses and future targets.参与科学的政治想象:险些失误与未来目标。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):16-20. doi: 10.1177/0963662513476220.
10
From deficit to democracy (re-visited).从赤字到民主(再探讨)。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):71-6. doi: 10.1177/0963662513510646.

引用本文的文献

1
From lab to society: Fostering clinical translation of molecular systems engineering.从实验室到社会:促进分子系统工程的临床转化
Bioeng Transl Med. 2023 Jun 22;9(1):e10564. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10564. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Seven open questions in the futures of human genome editing.人类基因组编辑未来的七个开放性问题。
Futures. 2023 May;149. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2023.103138. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
3
Meet the Medicines-A Crowdsourced Approach to Collecting and Communicating Information about Essential Medicines Online.Meet the Medicines—一种通过众包方式在线收集和传播基本药物信息的方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;20(5):4242. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054242.
4
Toward Anticipatory Governance of Human Genome Editing: A Critical Review of Scholarly Governance Discourse.迈向人类基因组编辑的前瞻性治理:对学术治理话语的批判性审视
J Responsible Innov. 2021;8(3):382-420. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2021.1957579. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
5
Nights at the museum: integrated arts and microbiology public engagement events enhance understanding of science whilst increasing community diversity and inclusion.博物馆之夜:综合艺术与微生物学的公众参与活动增进了对科学的理解,同时增加了社区的多样性和包容性。
Access Microbiol. 2021 May 5;3(5):000231. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000231. eCollection 2021.
6
Information society and its impact on personality development.信息社会及其对个性发展的影响。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2021;26(5):5457-5475. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10549-5. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
7
Discussion structures as tools for public deliberation.讨论结构作为公众审议的工具。
Public Underst Sci. 2020 Jan;29(1):76-93. doi: 10.1177/0963662519880675. Epub 2019 Oct 18.