Department of Neurology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
J Intern Med. 2014 Apr;275(4):350-63. doi: 10.1111/joim.12203. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a presumed autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system, resulting in inflammatory demyelination and axonal and neuronal injury. New diagnostic criteria that incorporate magnetic resonance imaging have resulted in earlier and more accurate diagnosis of MS. Several immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive therapeutic agents are available for relapsing forms of MS, which allow individualized treatment based upon the benefits and risks. Disease-modifying therapies introduced in the 1990s, the beta-interferons and glatiramer acetate, have an established track record of efficacy and safety, although they require administration via injection. More recently, monoclonal antibodies have been engineered to act through specific mechanisms such as blocking alpha-4 integrin interactions (natalizumab) or lysing cells bearing specific markers, for example CD52 (alemtuzumab) or CD20 (ocrelizumab and ofatumumab). These agents can be highly efficacious, but sometimes have serious potential complications (natalizumab is associated with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; alemtuzumab is associated with the development of new autoimmune disorders). Three new oral therapies (fingolimod, teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate, approved for MS treatment from 2010 onwards) provide efficacy, tolerability and convenience; however, as yet, there are no long-term postmarketing efficacy and safety data in a general MS population. Because of this lack of long-term data, in some cases, therapy is currently initiated with the older, safer injectable medications, but patients are monitored closely with the plan to switch therapies if there is any indication of a suboptimal response or intolerance or lack of adherence to the initial therapy. For patients with MS who present with highly inflammatory and potentially aggressive disease, the benefit-to-risk ratio may support initiating therapy using a drug with greater potential efficacy despite greater risks (e.g. fingolimod or natalizumab if JC virus antibody-negative). The aim of this review is to discuss the clinical benefits, mechanisms of action, safety profiles and monitoring strategies of current MS disease-modifying therapies in clinical practice and of those expected to enter the market in the near future.
多发性硬化症(MS)是一种中枢神经系统的自身免疫性疾病,导致炎症性脱髓鞘和轴突及神经元损伤。新的纳入磁共振成像的诊断标准导致 MS 的早期和更准确的诊断。有几种免疫调节和免疫抑制治疗药物可用于复发形式的 MS,根据获益和风险进行个体化治疗。在 20 世纪 90 年代引入的疾病修正疗法,β干扰素和醋酸格拉替雷,具有既定的疗效和安全性记录,尽管它们需要通过注射给药。最近,单克隆抗体被设计成通过特定的机制发挥作用,例如阻断α-4 整合素相互作用(那他珠单抗)或裂解具有特定标志物的细胞,例如 CD52(阿仑单抗)或 CD20(奥瑞珠单抗和奥法妥木单抗)。这些药物可能非常有效,但有时会有严重的潜在并发症(那他珠单抗与进行性多灶性白质脑病相关;阿仑单抗与新的自身免疫性疾病的发展相关)。三种新的口服疗法(芬戈莫德、特立氟胺和富马酸二甲酯,自 2010 年以来批准用于 MS 治疗)提供疗效、耐受性和便利性;然而,到目前为止,在一般 MS 人群中还没有长期的上市后疗效和安全性数据。由于缺乏长期数据,在某些情况下,目前使用较老的、安全性较高的注射药物开始治疗,但如果有任何迹象表明反应不佳、不耐受或不遵守初始治疗,则密切监测患者并计划转换治疗。对于表现出高度炎症和潜在侵袭性疾病的 MS 患者,获益-风险比可能支持使用潜在疗效更大的药物开始治疗,尽管风险更大(例如,如果 JC 病毒抗体阴性,则使用芬戈莫德或那他珠单抗)。本综述的目的是讨论当前 MS 疾病修正治疗在临床实践中的临床获益、作用机制、安全性概况和监测策略,以及近期有望进入市场的治疗药物。