• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用边际结构模型和治疗权重逆概率时混杂因素中的误差对因果参数估计的影响:一项模拟研究

The effect of error-in-confounders on the estimation of the causal parameter when using marginal structural models and inverse probability-of-treatment weights: a simulation study.

作者信息

Regier Michael D, Moodie Erica E M, Platt Robert W

出版信息

Int J Biostat. 2014;10(1):1-15. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2012-0039.

DOI:10.1515/ijb-2012-0039
PMID:24445244
Abstract

We performed an empirical study to evaluate the effect of mismeasured continuous confounders on the estimation of the causal parameter when using marginal structural models and inverse probability-of-treatment weighting. By executing an extensive simulation using 500 randomly generated parameter value combinations within a defined space, we observed the well-understood effects of attenuation and augmentation, and two unanticipated effects: null effects and sign reversals. We implemented a secondary empirical study to further investigate the sign reversal effect. We use the results of our study to identify conceptual similarities between the analytic and empirical results for multivariable linear and logistic regression, and our empirical results. Through this synthesis, we have been able to suggest feasible directions of research as well as outline the form of expected results.

摘要

我们进行了一项实证研究,以评估在使用边际结构模型和治疗逆概率加权时,连续混杂因素测量错误对因果参数估计的影响。通过在定义的空间内使用500个随机生成的参数值组合进行广泛的模拟,我们观察到了众所周知的衰减和增强效应,以及两个意外效应:零效应和符号反转。我们进行了一项二次实证研究,以进一步调查符号反转效应。我们利用研究结果来识别多变量线性和逻辑回归的分析结果与实证结果之间的概念相似性,以及我们的实证结果。通过这种综合,我们能够提出可行的研究方向,并概述预期结果的形式。

相似文献

1
The effect of error-in-confounders on the estimation of the causal parameter when using marginal structural models and inverse probability-of-treatment weights: a simulation study.使用边际结构模型和治疗权重逆概率时混杂因素中的误差对因果参数估计的影响:一项模拟研究
Int J Biostat. 2014;10(1):1-15. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2012-0039.
2
The alarming problems of confounding equivalence using logistic regression models in the perspective of causal diagrams.从因果关系图的角度看,逻辑回归模型中混杂等价性的令人震惊的问题。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0449-7.
3
Constructing inverse probability weights for continuous exposures: a comparison of methods.构建连续暴露的逆概率权重:方法比较。
Epidemiology. 2014 Mar;25(2):292-9. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000053.
4
Structural equation modeling versus marginal structural modeling for assessing mediation in the presence of posttreatment confounding.在存在治疗后混杂因素的情况下,用于评估中介作用的结构方程模型与边际结构模型对比
Psychol Methods. 2015 Jun;20(2):204-20. doi: 10.1037/a0036368. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
5
An Application of Inverse Probability Weighting Estimation of Marginal Structural Models of a Continuous Exposure: Benzodiazepines and Delirium.连续暴露边际结构模型的逆概率加权估计应用:苯二氮䓬类药物与谵妄
Epidemiology. 2015 Sep;26(5):e52-3. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000346.
6
A cautionary note concerning the use of stabilized weights in marginal structural models.关于在边际结构模型中使用稳定权重的警示说明。
Stat Med. 2015 Feb 28;34(5):812-23. doi: 10.1002/sim.6378. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
7
Inverse-probability-of-treatment weighted estimation of causal parameters in the presence of error-contaminated and time-dependent confounders.在存在误差污染和时间依赖性混杂因素的情况下,对因果参数进行治疗逆概率加权估计。
Biom J. 2019 Nov;61(6):1507-1525. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201600228. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
8
Marginal structural models as a tool for standardization.边际结构模型作为一种标准化工具。
Epidemiology. 2003 Nov;14(6):680-6. doi: 10.1097/01.EDE.0000081989.82616.7d.
9
Impact of outcome model misspecification on regression and doubly-robust inverse probability weighting to estimate causal effect.结局模型误设对用于估计因果效应的回归及双重稳健逆概率加权法的影响。
Int J Biostat. 2010;6(2):Article 15. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1207.
10
Correcting for Measurement Error in Time-Varying Covariates in Marginal Structural Models.边际结构模型中时变协变量测量误差的校正
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Aug 1;184(3):249-58. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww068. Epub 2016 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative Bias Analysis for a Misclassified Confounder: A Comparison Between Marginal Structural Models and Conditional Models for Point Treatments.对有偏分类混杂因素的定量偏差分析:点治疗的边际结构模型与条件模型的比较。
Epidemiology. 2020 Nov;31(6):796-805. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001239.
2
When to Censor?何时进行审查?
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Mar 1;187(3):623-632. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx281.
3
Correcting for Measurement Error in Time-Varying Covariates in Marginal Structural Models.边际结构模型中时变协变量测量误差的校正
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Aug 1;184(3):249-58. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww068. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
4
The Impact of Sparse Follow-up on Marginal Structural Models for Time-to-Event Data.稀疏随访对事件发生时间数据的边际结构模型的影响
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Dec 15;182(12):1047-55. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv152. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
5
Multiple Imputation to Account for Measurement Error in Marginal Structural Models.用于处理边际结构模型中测量误差的多重填补法
Epidemiology. 2015 Sep;26(5):645-52. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000330.