• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在存在治疗后混杂因素的情况下,用于评估中介作用的结构方程模型与边际结构模型对比

Structural equation modeling versus marginal structural modeling for assessing mediation in the presence of posttreatment confounding.

作者信息

Moerkerke Beatrijs, Loeys Tom, Vansteelandt Stijn

机构信息

Department of Data Analysis, Ghent University.

Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University.

出版信息

Psychol Methods. 2015 Jun;20(2):204-20. doi: 10.1037/a0036368. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1037/a0036368
PMID:25751514
Abstract

Inverse probability weighting for marginal structural models has been suggested as a strategy to estimate the direct effect of a treatment or exposure on an outcome in studies where the effect of mediator on outcome is subject to posttreatment confounding. This type of confounding, whereby confounders of the effect of mediator on outcome are themselves affected by the exposure, complicates mediation analyses and necessitates apt analysis strategies. In this article, we contrast the inverse probability weighting approach with the traditional path analysis approach to mediation analysis. We show that in a particular class of linear models, adjustment for posttreatment confounding can be realized via a fairly standard modification of the traditional path analysis approach. The resulting approach is simpler; by avoiding inverse probability weighting, it moreover results in direct effect estimators with smaller finite sample bias and greater precision. We further show that a particular variant of the G-estimation approach from the causal inference literature is equivalent with the path analysis approach in simple linear settings but is more generally applicable in settings with interactions and/or noncontinuous mediators and confounders. We conclude that the use of inverse probability weighting for marginal structural models to adjust for posttreatment confounding in mediation analysis is primarily indicated in nonlinear models for the outcome.

摘要

在中介变量对结局的影响存在治疗后混杂因素的研究中,边际结构模型的逆概率加权法已被提议作为一种估计治疗或暴露对结局直接效应的策略。这种类型的混杂,即中介变量对结局的影响的混杂因素本身受到暴露的影响,使中介分析变得复杂,因此需要合适的分析策略。在本文中,我们将逆概率加权法与传统的路径分析中介分析方法进行了对比。我们表明,在一类特定的线性模型中,通过对传统路径分析方法进行相当标准的修改,可以实现对治疗后混杂因素的调整。由此产生的方法更简单;通过避免逆概率加权,它还能得到有限样本偏差更小、精度更高的直接效应估计量。我们进一步表明,因果推断文献中G估计方法的一个特定变体在简单线性设置中与路径分析方法等效,但在存在交互作用和/或非连续中介变量及混杂因素的设置中更普遍适用。我们得出结论,在中介分析中使用边际结构模型的逆概率加权法来调整治疗后混杂因素主要适用于结局的非线性模型。

相似文献

1
Structural equation modeling versus marginal structural modeling for assessing mediation in the presence of posttreatment confounding.在存在治疗后混杂因素的情况下,用于评估中介作用的结构方程模型与边际结构模型对比
Psychol Methods. 2015 Jun;20(2):204-20. doi: 10.1037/a0036368. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
2
The alarming problems of confounding equivalence using logistic regression models in the perspective of causal diagrams.从因果关系图的角度看,逻辑回归模型中混杂等价性的令人震惊的问题。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0449-7.
3
Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies.纵向观察性研究因果推断的工具变量与逆概率加权法
Stat Methods Med Res. 2004 Feb;13(1):17-48. doi: 10.1191/0962280204sm351ra.
4
Assessing mediation using marginal structural models in the presence of confounding and moderation.在存在混杂和调节的情况下,使用边缘结构模型评估中介效应。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Dec;17(4):642-64. doi: 10.1037/a0029311. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
5
Longitudinal Mediation Analysis Using Natural Effect Models.纵向中介效应分析采用自然效应模型。
Am J Epidemiol. 2020 Nov 2;189(11):1427-1435. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa092.
6
Exploring the Subtleties of Inverse Probability Weighting and Marginal Structural Models.探索逆概率加权和边缘结构模型的细微差别。
Epidemiology. 2018 May;29(3):352-355. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000813.
7
Distribution-free mediation analysis for nonlinear models with confounding.无分布中介分析在有混杂的非线性模型中的应用。
Epidemiology. 2012 Nov;23(6):879-88. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31826c2bb9.
8
The effect of error-in-confounders on the estimation of the causal parameter when using marginal structural models and inverse probability-of-treatment weights: a simulation study.使用边际结构模型和治疗权重逆概率时混杂因素中的误差对因果参数估计的影响:一项模拟研究
Int J Biostat. 2014;10(1):1-15. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2012-0039.
9
Posttreatment confounding in causal mediation studies: A cutting-edge problem and a novel solution via sensitivity analysis.治疗后混杂在因果中介研究中的问题:通过敏感性分析解决前沿问题和新方法。
Biometrics. 2023 Jun;79(2):1042-1056. doi: 10.1111/biom.13705. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
10
Estimation of Controlled Direct Effects in Longitudinal Mediation Analyses with Latent Variables in Randomized Studies.在随机研究中,使用潜在变量对纵向中介分析中的受控直接效应进行估计。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2020 Sep-Oct;55(5):763-785. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2019.1681251. Epub 2019 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanisms of Change in Exposure Therapy for Anxiety and Related Disorders: A Research Agenda.焦虑及相关障碍暴露疗法的改变机制:一项研究议程。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Jul;13(4):687-719. doi: 10.1177/21677026241240727. Epub 2024 May 25.
2
Weaker Effects of Parental Education on Oral Nicotine Use of High School Students in Rural Areas: Marginalization-Related Diminished Returns.父母教育对农村地区高中生口腔尼古丁使用的影响较弱:与边缘化相关的收益递减。
Open J Educ Res. 2025;5(2). doi: 10.31586/ojer.2025.6042. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
3
Cingulate Gyrus Volume as a Mediator of the Social Gradient in Cognitive Function.
扣带回体积作为认知功能社会梯度的中介因素
J Cell Neurosci. 2025;1(1). doi: 10.31586/jcn.2025.1139. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
4
Practical challenges in mediation analysis: a guide for applied researchers.中介分析中的实际挑战:应用研究人员指南
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2025;25(1):57-84. doi: 10.1007/s10742-024-00327-4. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
5
Association between psychological stress, anxiety and oral health status among college students during the Omicron wave: a cross-sectional study.奥密克戎变异株流行期间大学生心理压力、焦虑与口腔健康状况的相关性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 10;23(1):470. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03151-3.
6
A Viable Alternative When Propensity Scores Fail: Evaluation of Inverse Propensity Weighting and Sequential G-Estimation in a Two-Wave Mediation Model.当倾向得分法失效时的可行替代方案:在两波中介模型中对逆倾向得分加权和序贯 G 估计的评估。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2020 Mar-Apr;55(2):165-187. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2019.1614429. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
7
Confounding in statistical mediation analysis: What it is and how to address it.统计中介分析中的混杂:是什么以及如何解决它。
J Couns Psychol. 2017 Nov;64(6):659-671. doi: 10.1037/cou0000242.
8
Causal inference and longitudinal data: a case study of religion and mental health.因果推断与纵向数据:宗教与心理健康的案例研究
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;51(11):1457-1466. doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1281-9. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
9
Mediation analysis with intermediate confounding: structural equation modeling viewed through the causal inference lens.具有中间混杂因素的中介分析:从因果推断视角审视结构方程模型
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Jan 1;181(1):64-80. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu239. Epub 2014 Dec 11.