• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抽样能力是人类联想学习个体差异的基础。

Sampling capacity underlies individual differences in human associative learning.

作者信息

Byrom Nicola C, Murphy Robin A

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2014 Apr;40(2):133-43. doi: 10.1037/xan0000012.

DOI:10.1037/xan0000012
PMID:24446699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4025161/
Abstract

Though much work has studied how external factors, such as stimulus properties, influence generalization of associative strength, there has been limited exploration of the influence that internal dispositions may contribute to stimulus processing. Here we report 2 studies using a modified negative patterning discrimination to test the relationship between global processing and generalization. Global processing was associated with stronger negative patterning discrimination, indicative of limited generalization between distinct stimulus compounds and their constituent elements. In Experiment 2, participants pretrained to adopt global processing similarly showed strong negative patterning discrimination. These results demonstrate considerable individual difference in capacity to engage in negative patterning discrimination and suggest that the tendency toward global processing may be one factor explaining this variability. The need for models of learning to account for this variability in learning is discussed.

摘要

尽管已有大量研究探讨了外部因素(如刺激属性)如何影响联想强度的泛化,但对于内部倾向可能对刺激加工产生的影响,人们的探索还很有限。在此,我们报告两项研究,它们使用经过修改的负性模式辨别任务来测试整体加工与泛化之间的关系。整体加工与更强的负性模式辨别相关,这表明在不同的刺激复合物及其组成元素之间的泛化有限。在实验2中,预先接受训练以采用整体加工的参与者同样表现出很强的负性模式辨别能力。这些结果表明,在进行负性模式辨别能力方面存在相当大的个体差异,并表明整体加工倾向可能是解释这种变异性的一个因素。文中还讨论了学习模型考虑这种学习变异性的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75a4/4025161/f83f314754fa/xan_40_2_133_fig5a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75a4/4025161/353ef415e3cb/xan_40_2_133_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75a4/4025161/c4020d5df948/xan_40_2_133_fig2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75a4/4025161/56dc6c3a8e7d/xan_40_2_133_fig3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75a4/4025161/539181a74407/xan_40_2_133_fig4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75a4/4025161/f83f314754fa/xan_40_2_133_fig5a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75a4/4025161/353ef415e3cb/xan_40_2_133_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75a4/4025161/c4020d5df948/xan_40_2_133_fig2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75a4/4025161/56dc6c3a8e7d/xan_40_2_133_fig3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75a4/4025161/539181a74407/xan_40_2_133_fig4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75a4/4025161/f83f314754fa/xan_40_2_133_fig5a.jpg

相似文献

1
Sampling capacity underlies individual differences in human associative learning.抽样能力是人类联想学习个体差异的基础。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2014 Apr;40(2):133-43. doi: 10.1037/xan0000012.
2
Different parameters support generalization and discrimination learning in Drosophila at the flight simulator.不同的参数支持果蝇在飞行模拟器中的泛化和辨别学习。
Learn Mem. 2006 Sep-Oct;13(5):629-37. doi: 10.1101/lm.319406.
3
Stimulus discriminability and induction as independent components of generalization.刺激辨别力和感应作为泛化的独立成分。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Jun;46(6):1106-1120. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000779. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
4
Negative evidence and inductive reasoning in generalization of associative learning.在联想学习的泛化中,否定证据和归纳推理。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Feb;148(2):289-303. doi: 10.1037/xge0000496. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
5
Multiple learning parameters differentially regulate olfactory generalization.多个学习参数差异性地调节嗅觉泛化。
Behav Neurosci. 2009 Feb;123(1):26-35. doi: 10.1037/a0013991.
6
Explaining compound generalization in associative and causal learning through rational principles of dimensional generalization.通过维度泛化的理性原则解释联想学习和因果学习中的复合泛化。
Psychol Rev. 2014 Jul;121(3):526-58. doi: 10.1037/a0037018.
7
Integrality/separability of stimulus dimensions and multidimensional generalization in pigeons.鸽子刺激维度的整体性/可分性与多维泛化
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Apr;36(2):194-205. doi: 10.1037/a0016560.
8
Generalization decrements: further support for flexibility in stimulus processing.泛化递减:对刺激处理灵活性的进一步支持。
Learn Behav. 2010 Nov;38(4):367-73. doi: 10.3758/LB.38.4.367.
9
Analysis of an ambiguous-feature discrimination.对模糊特征辨别能力的分析。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Nov;61(11):1710-25. doi: 10.1080/17470210701680746.
10
Generalized associative representations in parietal cortex.顶叶皮层的广义联想表示。
Nat Neurosci. 2011 Jul 17;14(8):1075-9. doi: 10.1038/nn.2878.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond intervention into daily life: A systematic review of generalisation following social communication interventions for young children with autism.超越日常生活干预:自闭症幼儿社交沟通干预后泛化的系统评价。
Autism Res. 2020 Apr;13(4):506-522. doi: 10.1002/aur.2264. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
2
Use of evidence in a categorization task: analytic and holistic processing modes.分类任务中证据的使用:分析性与整体性加工模式。
Cogn Process. 2017 Nov;18(4):431-446. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0829-2. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
3
Individual Difference Factors in the Learning and Transfer of Patterning Discriminations.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing positive and negative patterning in human learning.比较人类学习中的正性和负性模式化。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Dec;64(12):2316-33. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.605153. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
2
Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires.积极情绪拓宽了注意力的范围以及思维行动指令系统。
Cogn Emot. 2005 May 1;19(3):313-332. doi: 10.1080/02699930441000238.
3
Effects of concurrent load on feature- and rule-based generalization in human contingency learning.并发负荷对人类偶然性学习中基于特征和规则的泛化的影响。
模式辨别学习与迁移中的个体差异因素
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 28;8:1262. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01262. eCollection 2017.
4
Prior beliefs influence symmetrical or asymmetrical generalizations in human causal learning.
Learn Behav. 2017 Sep;45(3):300-312. doi: 10.3758/s13420-017-0273-2.
5
The relationship between mood state and perceived control in contingency learning: effects of individualist and collectivist values.权变学习中情绪状态与感知控制之间的关系:个人主义和集体主义价值观的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 29;6:1430. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01430. eCollection 2015.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Jul;37(3):308-16. doi: 10.1037/a0023120.
4
Priming global and local processing of composite faces: revisiting the processing-bias effect on face perception.启动对合成面孔的整体和局部加工:重新审视加工偏差对面孔感知的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Jul;73(5):1477-86. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0109-7.
5
Solving XOR.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Oct;34(4):486-93. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.34.4.486.
6
The flexibility thesis: a critique--commentary on Melchers,Shanks and Lachnit.
Behav Processes. 2008 Mar;77(3):440-2. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.09.012. Epub 2007 Oct 13.
7
Stimulus coding in human associative learning: flexible representations of parts and wholes.人类联想学习中的刺激编码:部分与整体的灵活表征
Behav Processes. 2008 Mar;77(3):413-27; discussion 451-3. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.09.013. Epub 2007 Oct 13.
8
What are flexible representations? Commentary on Melchers, Shanks and Lachnit.什么是灵活表征?对梅尔彻斯、尚克斯和拉赫尼特的评论。
Behav Processes. 2008 Mar;77(3):437-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.09.006. Epub 2007 Oct 2.
9
Multimodal discrimination learning in humans: evidence for configural theory.人类的多模态辨别学习:构型理论的证据
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Nov;60(11):1477-95. doi: 10.1080/17470210601154560.
10
Effects of processing bias on the recognition of composite face halves.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):1038-42. doi: 10.3758/bf03206440.