Actis Giovanni C, Pellicano Rinaldo, Fadda Maurizio, Rosina Floriano
Division of Gastro- Hepatology, Ospedale Gradenigo, Corso Regina Margherita 10, Torino, Italy.
Curr Drug Saf. 2014;9(2):133-7. doi: 10.2174/1574886309666140120095233.
To explore the type and frequency of the unwanted effects following use of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and antibiotics in a gastroenterological out-patient setting.
We analyzed a gastroenterological database which includes 151 inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients followed between January 2008 and December 2009. The key-words included NSAIDs and antibiotics.
Of 19 cases treated with NSAIDs, 8 displayed convincing evidence linking them with the subsequent development of IBD. Of 44 antibiotic mentions, 7 documents alluded to macrolide prescriptions, which were followed by induction or relapse of IBD in 5; all of the newly diagnosed cases of IBD were endoscopically proven, and one ran a fulminant course requiring emergency colectomy; 4 of 5 prescriptions of amoxycillin/clavulanic acid were accompanied by toxicity (three hepatitides and one reactivated IBD). Overall, the frequency of unwanted effects was 36% for both NSAIDs and antibiotics.
We suggest that NSAIDs and antibiotics (specifically of the macrolide structure) can induce gut and hepatic damage, significantly enhancing co-morbidities in gastroenterologic out-patients, with break of cost-containment guidelines. Therefore, caution is advisable in prescribing NSAIDs and antibiotics in this setting. Though retrospective and possibly biased, the current data coincide with both bench work and epidemiological evidence.
探讨在胃肠病门诊环境中使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和抗生素后不良反应的类型和频率。
我们分析了一个胃肠病学数据库,该数据库包括2008年1月至2009年12月期间随访的151例炎症性肠病(IBD)患者。关键词包括NSAIDs和抗生素。
在19例接受NSAIDs治疗的患者中,8例有令人信服的证据表明其与随后IBD的发生有关。在提及的44例抗生素使用中,7份文件提到了大环内酯类药物处方,其中5例随后出现IBD的诱发或复发;所有新诊断的IBD病例均经内镜证实,1例病情凶险,需紧急行结肠切除术;5例阿莫西林/克拉维酸处方中有4例伴有毒性反应(3例肝炎和1例IBD复发)。总体而言,NSAIDs和抗生素的不良反应发生率均为36%。
我们认为NSAIDs和抗生素(特别是大环内酯类结构)可导致肠道和肝脏损伤,显著增加胃肠病门诊患者的合并症,违反成本控制指南。因此,在这种情况下开具NSAIDs和抗生素时应谨慎。尽管本研究为回顾性研究且可能存在偏倚,但目前的数据与基础研究和流行病学证据均相符。