Suppr超能文献

高剂量(86.4Gy)调强放疗与近距离放疗联合调强放疗治疗中危前列腺癌的比较。

Comparison of high-dose (86.4 Gy) IMRT vs combined brachytherapy plus IMRT for intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

机构信息

Departments of Radiation Oncology, Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2014 Sep;114(3):360-7. doi: 10.1111/bju.12514. Epub 2014 Jan 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare tumour control and toxicity outcomes with the use of high-dose intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) alone or brachytherapy combined with IMRT (combo-RT) for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1997 and 2010, 870 consecutive patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated at our institution with either 86.4 Gy of IMRT alone (n = 470) or combo-RT consisting of brachytherapy combined with 50.4 Gy of IMRT (n = 400). Brachytherapy consisted of low-dose-rate permanent interstitial implantation in 260 patients and high-dose-rate temporary implantation in 140 patients. The median (range) follow-up for the entire cohort was 5.3 (1-14) years.

RESULTS

For IMRT alone vs combo-RT, 7-year actuarial prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-relapse-free survival (PSA-RFS) rates were 81.4 vs 92.0% (P < 0.001), and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) rates were 93.0 vs 97.2% (P = 0.04), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that combo-RT was associated with better PSA-RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40 [95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.66], P < 0.001), and better DMFS (HR, 0.41 [0.18-0.92], P = 0.03). A higher incidence of acute genitourinary (GU) grade 2 (35.8 vs 18.9%; P < 0.01) and acute GU grade 3 (2.3 vs 0.4%; P = 0.03) toxicities occurred in the combo-RT group than in the IMRT-alone group. Most acute toxicity resolved. Late toxicity outcomes were similar between the treatment groups. The 7-year actuarial late toxicity rates for grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were 4.6 vs 4.1% (P = 0.89), for grade 3 GI toxicity 0.4 vs 1.4% (P = 0.36), for grade 2 GU toxicity 19.4 vs 21.2% (P = 0.14), and grade 3 GU toxicity 3.1 vs 1.4% (P = 0.74) for the IMRT vs the combo-RT group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhanced dose escalation using combo-RT was associated with superior PSA-RFS and DMFS outcomes for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer compared with high-dose IMRT alone at a dose of 86.4 Gy. While acute GU toxicities were more prevalent in the combo-RT group, the incidence of late GI and GU toxicities was similar between the treatment groups.

摘要

目的

比较高剂量调强放疗(IMRT)单独应用或近距离放疗联合 IMRT(联合 RT)治疗中危前列腺癌患者的肿瘤控制和毒性结果。

患者和方法

1997 年至 2010 年,870 例中危前列腺癌患者在我院接受治疗,其中 470 例接受 86.4 Gy 的 IMRT 单独治疗(n=470),400 例接受联合 RT 治疗,包括低剂量率永久性间质植入近距离放疗和 50.4 Gy 的 IMRT(n=400)。260 例患者接受低剂量率永久性间质植入近距离放疗,140 例患者接受高剂量率临时植入近距离放疗。整个队列的中位(范围)随访时间为 5.3(1-14)年。

结果

与 IMRT 单独治疗相比,联合 RT 治疗的 7 年前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)无复发生存率(PSA-RFS)分别为 81.4%和 92.0%(P<0.001),远处无转移生存率(DMFS)分别为 93.0%和 97.2%(P=0.04)。多因素分析显示,联合 RT 治疗与更好的 PSA-RFS 相关(风险比[HR],0.40[95%置信区间,0.24-0.66],P<0.001)和更好的 DMFS(HR,0.41[0.18-0.92],P=0.03)。联合 RT 组的急性泌尿生殖系统(GU)2 级(35.8%比 18.9%;P<0.01)和 3 级(2.3%比 0.4%;P=0.03)毒性发生率高于 IMRT 单独治疗组。大多数急性毒性反应得到缓解。两组的晚期毒性结局相似。7 年时,2 级胃肠道(GI)毒性的累积发生率分别为 4.6%和 4.1%(P=0.89),3 级 GI 毒性的发生率分别为 0.4%和 1.4%(P=0.36),2 级 GU 毒性的发生率分别为 19.4%和 21.2%(P=0.14),3 级 GU 毒性的发生率分别为 3.1%和 1.4%(P=0.74)。

结论

与 86.4 Gy 高剂量 IMRT 相比,中危前列腺癌患者采用联合 RT 增强剂量递增与更好的 PSA-RFS 和 DMFS 结果相关。联合 RT 组的急性 GU 毒性更为常见,但两组的晚期 GI 和 GU 毒性发生率相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验