Suppr超能文献

开发一项复杂干预措施以提高初级医疗保健中的处方安全性:混合方法可行性与优化试点研究

Developing a complex intervention to improve prescribing safety in primary care: mixed methods feasibility and optimisation pilot study.

作者信息

Grant Aileen M, Guthrie Bruce, Dreischulte Tobias

机构信息

Quality, Safety and Informatics Group, Population Health Sciences, Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 21;4(1):e004153. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004153.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

(A) To measure the extent to which different candidate outcome measures identified high-risk prescribing that is potentially changeable by the data-driven quality improvement in primary care (DQIP) intervention.(B) To explore the value of reviewing identified high-risk prescribing to clinicians.(C) To optimise the components of the DQIP intervention.

DESIGN

Mixed method study.

SETTING

General practices in two Scottish Health boards.

PARTICIPANTS

4 purposively sampled general practices of varying size and socioeconomic deprivation.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Prescribing measures targeting (1) high-risk use of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and antiplatelets; (2) 'Asthma control' and (3) 'Antithrombotics in atrial fibrillation (AF)'.

INTERVENTION

The prescribing measures were used to identify patients for review by general practices. The ability of the measures to identify potentially changeable high-risk prescribing was measured as the proportion of patients reviewed where practices identified a need for action. Field notes were recorded from meetings between researchers and staff and key staff participated in semistructured interviews exploring their experience of the piloted intervention processes.

RESULTS

Practices identified a need for action in 68%, 25% and 18% of patients reviewed for prescribing measures (1), (2) and (3), respectively. General practitioners valued being prompted to review patients, and perceived that (1) 'NSAID and antiplatelet' and (2) 'antithrombotics in AF' were the most important to act on. Barriers to initial and ongoing engagement and to sustaining improvements in prescribing were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

'NSAIDs and antiplatelets' measures were selected as the most suitable outcome measures for the DQIP trial, based on evidence of this prescribing being more easily changeable. In response to the barriers identified, the intervention was designed to include a financial incentive, additional ongoing feedback on progress and reprompting review of patients, whose high-risk prescribing was restarted after a decision to stop.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01425502.

摘要

目标

(A) 衡量不同候选结局指标识别出的高风险处方在多大程度上可通过初级保健中的数据驱动质量改进(DQIP)干预而改变。(B) 探讨向临床医生反馈已识别出的高风险处方的价值。(C) 优化 DQIP 干预的组成部分。

设计

混合方法研究。

背景

苏格兰两个卫生委员会的全科诊所。

参与者

4 个按目的抽样的规模和社会经济贫困程度各异的全科诊所。

结局指标

针对以下方面的处方指标:(1) 非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和抗血小板药物的高风险使用;(2) “哮喘控制”;(3) “心房颤动(AF)中的抗栓治疗”。

干预措施

处方指标用于确定需由全科诊所进行复查的患者。这些指标识别潜在可改变的高风险处方的能力通过实践中确定需要采取行动的复查患者比例来衡量。研究人员与工作人员之间的会议记录了现场笔记,关键工作人员参与了半结构化访谈,探讨他们对试点干预过程的体验。

结果

在针对处方指标(1)、(2)和(3)进行复查的患者中,实践分别确定 68%、25%和 18%的患者需要采取行动。全科医生重视被提示复查患者,并认为(1)“NSAID 和抗血小板药物”以及(2)“AF 中的抗栓治疗”是最需要采取行动的方面。确定了初始参与和持续参与以及维持处方改进的障碍。

结论

基于该处方更容易改变的证据,“NSAIDs 和抗血小板药物”指标被选为 DQIP 试验最合适的结局指标。针对已确定的障碍,干预措施设计包括经济激励、关于进展的额外持续反馈以及重新提示对高风险处方停药后又重新开始的患者进行复查。

试验注册号

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01425502。

相似文献

9

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of interactive dashboards to optimise prescribing in primary care: a protocol for a systematic review.
HRB Open Res. 2025 Feb 19;7:44. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13909.1. eCollection 2024.
3
General practice responses to opioid prescribing feedback: a qualitative process evaluation.
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Sep 30;71(711):e788-e796. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.1117. Print 2021 Oct.
4
Post-discharge care following acute kidney injury: quality improvement in primary care.
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Dec;9(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000891.
7
Clinical performance comparators in audit and feedback: a review of theory and evidence.
Implement Sci. 2019 Apr 24;14(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0887-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Medication assessment tool to detect care issues from routine data: a pilot study in primary care.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Dec;35(6):1063-74. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9828-2.
3
Risk of stroke and oral anticoagulant use in atrial fibrillation: a cross-sectional survey.
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Oct;62(603):e710-7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X656856.
10
Attitudes of physicians regarding anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review.
Age Ageing. 2011 Nov;40(6):675-83. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr097. Epub 2011 Aug 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验