van der Meulen Ineke, van de Sandt-Koenderman W Mieke E, Heijenbrok-Kal Majanka H, Visch-Brink Evy G, Ribbers Gerard M
Rijndam Rehabilitation Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Rijndam Rehabilitation Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Jul;28(6):536-44. doi: 10.1177/1545968313517753. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
Background Little is known about the efficacy of language production treatment in subacute severe nonfluent aphasia. Although Melodic Intonation Therapy (MIT) is a language production treatment for this disorder, until now MIT effect studies have focused on chronic aphasia. Purpose This study examines whether language production treatment with MIT is effective in subacute severe nonfluent aphasia. Methods A multicenter, randomized controlled trial was conducted in a waiting-list control design: patients were randomly allocated to the experimental group (MIT) or the control group (control intervention followed by delayed MIT). In both groups, therapy started at 2 to 3 months poststroke and was given intensively (5 h/wk) during 6 weeks. In a second therapy period, the control group received 6 weeks of intensive MIT. The experimental group resumed their regular treatment. Assessment was done at baseline (T1), after the first intervention period (T2), and after the second intervention period (T3). Efficacy was evaluated at T2. The impact of delaying MIT on therapy outcome was also examined. Results A total of 27 participants were included: n = 16 in the experimental group and n = 11 in the control group. A significant effect in favor of MIT on language repetition was observed for trained items, with mixed results for untrained items. After MIT there was a significant improvement in verbal communication but not after the control intervention. Finally, delaying MIT was related to less improvement in the repetition of trained material. Conclusions In these patients with subacute severe nonfluent aphasia, language production treatment with MIT was effective. Earlier treatment may lead to greater improvement.
关于亚急性重度非流畅性失语症语言产出治疗的疗效,目前所知甚少。尽管旋律语调疗法(MIT)是针对这种疾病的一种语言产出治疗方法,但到目前为止,MIT疗效研究主要集中在慢性失语症上。目的:本研究探讨MIT语言产出治疗对亚急性重度非流畅性失语症是否有效。方法:采用等待列表对照设计进行多中心随机对照试验:患者被随机分配到实验组(MIT)或对照组(先进行对照干预,随后进行延迟MIT)。两组均在中风后2至3个月开始治疗,并在6周内密集进行(每周5小时)。在第二个治疗阶段,对照组接受6周的密集MIT治疗。实验组恢复常规治疗。在基线(T1)、第一个干预期结束后(T2)和第二个干预期结束后(T3)进行评估。在T2评估疗效。还研究了延迟MIT对治疗结果的影响。结果:共纳入27名参与者:实验组n = 16,对照组n = 11。对于训练项目,观察到MIT在语言重复方面有显著效果,未训练项目的结果则好坏参半。接受MIT治疗后,言语交流有显著改善,但对照干预后没有。最后,延迟MIT与训练材料重复方面的改善较少有关。结论:在这些亚急性重度非流畅性失语症患者中,MIT语言产出治疗是有效的。早期治疗可能会带来更大的改善。