Human Performance Laboratory, Sports Medicine & Research Centre, Singapore Sports Council , Singapore.
J Sports Sci Med. 2005 Sep 1;4(3):278-84.
The aims of the present study were firstly to examine the reproducibility of outdoor flat and uphill cycling time trials (TT), and secondly to assess the relationship between peak power output (Wpeak) obtained in the laboratory and outdoor cycling performance in moderately trained cyclists. Eight competitive male cyclists first performed a progressive cycle ergometer test in the laboratory to determine Wpeak (W). Thereafter, they performed three 36 km TT (TT36) on a flat course on separate days and at the same time of the day. On a different day, they also performed three 1.4 km uphill TT (TT1.4) in a single day. The coefficient of variation (CV) values across three TT36 and TT1.4 ranged from 1.1 - 1.4% and 2.6 - 2.9%, for performance time (min) and mean power (W), respectively. The correlation between absolute Wpeak (W) obtained in the laboratory and mean power during TT36 and TT1.4 was 0.90 (p < 0.01) and 0.98 (p < 0.01), respectively. Absolute Wpeak (W) correlated significantly with performance time in TT36 (r = -0.72, p < 0.05) but not in TT1.4 (r = -0.52, p > 0.05). The correlation between relative Wpeak (W·kg(-1)) and performance time in TT36 and TT1.4 was r = -0.65 (p > 0.05) and r = -0.91 (p < 0.01), respectively. In conclusion, under stable environmental conditions, performance time and mean power are highly reproducible in moderately trained cyclists during outdoor cycling TT. Laboratory determined absolute Wpeak (W) may predict cycling performance on a flat course but relative Wpeak (W·kg(-1)) is a better predictor of performance during uphill cycling. Key PointsUnder stable environmental conditions, performance time and mean power are highly reproducible in moderately trained cyclists during outdoor flat and uphill cycling time trials.Laboratory determined peak power output (Wpeak) (W) may predict cycling performance on a flat course.Laboratory determined relative Wpeak (W·kg(-1)) is a better predictor of performance during uphill cycling.
本研究的目的首先是检验户外平地和上坡计时赛(TT)的可重复性,其次是评估在中等训练水平的自行车运动员中,实验室获得的最大功率输出(Wpeak)与户外骑行表现之间的关系。八名男性竞技自行车运动员首先在实验室进行了递增式功率自行车测试,以确定最大功率输出(W)。然后,他们在不同的日子、每天相同的时间进行了三次 36 公里 TT(TT36)。在不同的一天,他们还在一天内进行了三次 1.4 公里上坡 TT(TT1.4)。三次 TT36 和 TT1.4 的性能时间(min)和平均功率(W)的变异系数(CV)值分别为 1.1-1.4%和 2.6-2.9%。实验室获得的绝对 Wpeak(W)与 TT36 和 TT1.4 期间的平均功率之间的相关性分别为 0.90(p<0.01)和 0.98(p<0.01)。绝对 Wpeak(W)与 TT36 的性能时间呈显著相关(r=-0.72,p<0.05),但与 TT1.4 的性能时间不相关(r=-0.52,p>0.05)。相对 Wpeak(W·kg(-1))与 TT36 和 TT1.4 的性能时间的相关性分别为 r=-0.65(p>0.05)和 r=-0.91(p<0.01)。总之,在稳定的环境条件下,中等训练水平的自行车运动员在户外骑行 TT 中,性能时间和平均功率具有高度的可重复性。实验室确定的绝对 Wpeak(W)可能预测平地赛的骑行表现,但相对 Wpeak(W·kg(-1))是上坡赛骑行表现的更好预测指标。关键点在稳定的环境条件下,中等训练水平的自行车运动员在户外平地和上坡计时赛中,性能时间和平均功率具有高度的可重复性。实验室确定的最大功率输出(Wpeak)(W)可能预测平地赛的骑行表现。实验室确定的相对 Wpeak(W·kg(-1))是上坡赛骑行表现的更好预测指标。