Suppr超能文献

治疗性激光和超声在外周神经再生中的作用。

Action of therapeutic laser and ultrasound in peripheral nerve regeneration.

作者信息

Oliveira Fabrício Borges, Pereira Valéria Martins Dias, da Trindade Ana Paula Nassif Tondato, Shimano Antônio Carlos, Gabriel Ronaldo Eugênio Calçada Dias, Borges Ana Paula Oliveira

机构信息

Centro Universitário do Planalto de Araxá (UNIARAXÁ) - Araxá, MG, Brazil ; Department of Sport Science, Exercise and Health - CITAB, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.

Centro Universitário do Planalto de Araxá (UNIARAXÁ) - Araxá, MG, Brazil.

出版信息

Acta Ortop Bras. 2012;20(2):98-103. doi: 10.1590/S1413-78522012000200008.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of early therapeutic laser and ultrasound in the regeneration process of an injury in rats.

METHODS

We used 24 rats. Eighteen underwent surgery for sciatic nerve compression by a hemostat above the popliteal fossa. The animals were divided into three groups of six animals each. Normal control group. GI: Injured control without therapeutic intervention. GII: laser ArGaAl therapeutic intervention. GIII: therapeutic intervention of Pulsed Ultrasound. We begin therapeutic interventions 24 hours after injury, with daily applications for a period of fourteen consecutive days.

RESULTS

IN ASSESSING THE GIRTH OF THE MUSCLES OF THE RIGHT THEY, THE FOLLOWING AVERAGE DECREASE (IN MM) FOR EACH GI: 0.45, GII: 0.42, GIII: 0.40 In relation to travel time, both GII and GIII presented significant difference when compared to GI. In the final evaluation of the IFC, GII excelled in the GIII. As for the healing observed, a major great improvement was observed in GII and GIII.

CONCLUSION

The results showed that nerve recovery was higher with the laser application. Level of evidence II, Therapeutic Studies - Investigation of the results of treatment.

摘要

目的

评估早期治疗性激光和超声对大鼠损伤再生过程的疗效。

方法

我们使用了24只大鼠。18只在腘窝上方用止血钳进行坐骨神经压迫手术。动物被分为三组,每组6只。正常对照组。GI:未进行治疗干预的损伤对照组。GII:氩铝镓激光治疗干预。GIII:脉冲超声治疗干预。我们在损伤后24小时开始治疗干预,每天进行,持续14天。

结果

在评估右侧肌肉周长时,每组的平均减少量(以毫米为单位)如下:GI为0.45,GII为0.42,GIII为0.40。在行走时间方面,与GI相比,GII和GIII均有显著差异。在IFC的最终评估中,GII优于GIII。至于观察到的愈合情况,GII和GIII有较大改善。

结论

结果表明,激光治疗的神经恢复效果更好。证据等级II,治疗研究 - 治疗结果调查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1642/3718422/b6b1ffe06cb8/aob-20-098-g01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验