Quantitative Methods for Valuing Comparative Effectiveness Information.
作者信息
Basu Anirban, Meltzer David
机构信息
Department of Health Services and Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago IL.
出版信息
Biopharm Rep. 2010 Fall;17(2):2-10.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Quantitative Methods for Valuing Comparative Effectiveness Information.评估比较效果信息的定量方法。
Biopharm Rep. 2010 Fall;17(2):2-10.
2
Mental health care consumers' relative valuing of clinician performance information.心理健康护理消费者对临床医生表现信息的相对重视程度。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Apr;86(4):301-308. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000264. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
3
Do people who highly value happiness tend to ruminate?高度重视幸福的人会倾向于反复思考吗？
Curr Psychol. 2023 Jan 13:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-04131-6.
4
Is Valuing Happiness Associated With Lower Well-Being? A Factor-Level Analysis using the Valuing Happiness Scale.重视幸福与较低的幸福感有关吗？使用重视幸福量表的因素水平分析。
J Res Pers. 2016 Feb 1;60:46-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2015.11.003.
5
The economics of comparative effectiveness studies: societal and private perspectives and their implications for prioritizing public investments in comparative effectiveness research.比较效益研究的经济学：社会和私人视角及其对比较效益研究中公共投资优先级排序的影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):843-53. doi: 10.2165/11539400-000000000-00000.
6
Individual differences in valuing mates' physical attractiveness.在重视伴侣身体吸引力方面的个体差异。
Psychol Rep. 2006 Oct;99(2):502-11. doi: 10.2466/pr0.99.2.502-511.
7
An additional antecedent of empathic concern: valuing the welfare of the person in need.共情关注的另一个前提：重视有需要之人的福祉。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jul;93(1):65-74. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.65.
8
DESPERATELY SEEKING HAPPINESS: VALUING HAPPINESS IS ASSOCIATED WITH SYMPTOMS AND DIAGNOSIS OF DEPRESSION.拼命寻找幸福：重视幸福与抑郁症的症状及诊断相关。
J Soc Clin Psychol. 2014;33(10):890-905. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2014.33.10.890.
9
Psychological inflexibility and valuing happiness: Dangerous liaisons.心理僵化与重视幸福：危险的关联。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 11;13:949615. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.949615. eCollection 2022.
10
Valuing children's health: whose quality of life matters?重视儿童健康：谁的生活质量至关重要？
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Aug 1;30(8):633-5. doi: 10.2165/11632490-000000000-00000.
引用本文的文献
1
Private manufacturers' thresholds to invest in comparative effectiveness trials.私人制造商投资于比较疗效试验的门槛。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Oct 1;30(10):859-68. doi: 10.2165/11597730-000000000-00000.
本文引用的文献
1
Comparative effectiveness research for antipsychotic medications: how much is enough?抗精神病药物的比较效果研究：多少才足够？
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Sep-Oct;28(5):w794-808. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.w794. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
2
Value of information and value of implementation: application of an analytic framework to inform resource allocation decisions in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.信息价值和实施价值：应用分析框架为转移性激素难治性前列腺癌的资源分配决策提供信息。
Value Health. 2009 Mar-Apr;12(2):315-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00431.x. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
3
The value of implementation and the value of information: combined and uneven development.实施的价值与信息的价值：融合与不均衡发展
Med Decis Making. 2008 Jan-Feb;28(1):21-32. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07308751.
4
Value of information on preference heterogeneity and individualized care.偏好异质性和个性化护理信息的价值。
Med Decis Making. 2007 Mar-Apr;27(2):112-27. doi: 10.1177/0272989X06297393.
5
The value of medical spending in the United States, 1960-2000.1960年至2000年美国医疗支出的价值。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 31;355(9):920-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa054744.
6
Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia.抗精神病药物对慢性精神分裂症患者的疗效。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 22;353(12):1209-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051688. Epub 2005 Sep 19.
7
The value of information and optimal clinical trial design.信息的价值与优化的临床试验设计
Stat Med. 2005 Jun 30;24(12):1791-806. doi: 10.1002/sim.2069.
8
Expected value of sample information calculations in medical decision modeling.医学决策建模中样本信息计算的期望值
Med Decis Making. 2004 Mar-Apr;24(2):207-27. doi: 10.1177/0272989X04263162.
9
Addressing uncertainty in medical cost-effectiveness analysis implications of expected utility maximization for methods to perform sensitivity analysis and the use of cost-effectiveness analysis to set priorities for medical research.应对医疗成本效益分析中的不确定性：预期效用最大化对敏感性分析方法的影响以及利用成本效益分析为医学研究设定优先事项
J Health Econ. 2001 Jan;20(1):109-29. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(00)00071-0.
10
The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies.推理的无关性：一种用于医疗技术随机评估的决策方法。
J Health Econ. 1999 Jun;18(3):341-64. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(98)00039-3.
Zotero 插件