Suppr超能文献

被释放用于神经科学和生物医学研究的雌性小鼠。

Female mice liberated for inclusion in neuroscience and biomedical research.

作者信息

Prendergast Brian J, Onishi Kenneth G, Zucker Irving

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Institute for Mind and Biology, University of Chicago, United States.

Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, United States; Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, United States.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Mar;40:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.001. Epub 2014 Jan 20.

Abstract

The underrepresentation of female mice in neuroscience and biomedical research is based on the assumption that females are intrinsically more variable than males and must be tested at each of four stages of the estrous cycle to generate reliable data. Neither belief is empirically based. In a meta-analysis of 293 articles, behavioral, morphological, physiological, and molecular traits were monitored in male mice and females tested without regard to estrous cycle stage; variability was not significantly greater in females than males for any endpoint and was substantially greater in males for several traits. Group housing of mice increased variability in both males and females by 37%. Utilization of female mice in neuroscience research does not require monitoring of the estrous cycle. The prevalence of sex differences at all levels of biological organization, and limitations in generalizing findings obtained with males to females, argue for the routine inclusion of female rodents in most research protocols.

摘要

在神经科学和生物医学研究中,雌性小鼠的代表性不足是基于这样一种假设,即雌性本质上比雄性更具变异性,并且必须在发情周期的四个阶段分别进行测试才能生成可靠的数据。这两种观点都没有实证依据。在对293篇文章的荟萃分析中,对雄性小鼠和未考虑发情周期阶段进行测试的雌性小鼠的行为、形态、生理和分子特征进行了监测;在任何终点指标上,雌性的变异性都没有显著大于雄性,而且在几个特征上雄性的变异性要大得多。小鼠群居使雄性和雌性的变异性都增加了37%。在神经科学研究中使用雌性小鼠不需要监测发情周期。生物组织各个层面上性别差异的普遍性,以及将雄性实验结果推广到雌性时的局限性,都表明在大多数研究方案中应常规纳入雌性啮齿动物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验