Wallace Richard J, Brown-Elliott Barbara A, McNulty Steven, Philley Julie V, Killingley Jessica, Wilson Rebecca W, York Deanna S, Shepherd Sara, Griffith David E
Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX; Department of Microbiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX; Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX.
Department of Microbiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX; Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX.
Chest. 2014 Aug;146(2):276-282. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2538.
There is no large study validating the appropriateness of current treatment guidelines for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lung disease. This is a retrospective single-center review evaluating the efficacy of macrolide/azalide-containing regimens for nodular/bronchiectatic (NB) MAC lung disease.
Patients were treated according to contemporary guidelines with evaluation of microbiologic responses. Macrolide susceptibility of MAC isolates was done at initiation of therapy, 6 to 12 months during therapy, and on the first microbiologic recurrence isolate. Microbiologic recurrence isolates also underwent genotyping for comparison with the original isolates.
One hundred eighty patients completed > 12 months of macrolide/azalide multidrug therapy. Sputum conversion to culture negative occurred in 154 of 180 patients (86%). There were no differences in response between clarithromycin or azithromycin regimens. Treatment regimen modification occurred more frequently with daily (24 of 30 [80%]) vs intermittent (2 of 180 [1%]) therapy (P = .0001). No patient developed macrolide resistance during treatment. Microbiologic recurrences during therapy occurred in 14% of patients: 73% with reinfection MAC isolates, 27% with true relapse isolates (P = .03). Overall, treatment success (ie, sputum conversion without true microbiologic relapse) was achieved in 84% of patients. Microbiologic recurrences occurred in 74 of 155 patients (48%) after completion of therapy: 75% reinfection isolates, 25% true relapse isolates.
Current guidelines for macrolide/azalide-based therapies for NB MAC lung disease result in favorable microbiologic outcomes for most patients without promotion of macrolide resistance. Intermittent therapy is effective and significantly better tolerated than daily therapy. Microbiologic recurrences during or after therapy are common and most often due to reinfection MAC genotypes.
目前尚无大型研究验证当前鸟分枝杆菌复合群(MAC)肺病治疗指南的适宜性。这是一项回顾性单中心研究,评估含大环内酯类/氮杂内酯类方案治疗结节性/支气管扩张性(NB)MAC肺病的疗效。
根据当代指南对患者进行治疗,并评估微生物学反应。在治疗开始时、治疗6至12个月期间以及首次微生物学复发分离株时,对MAC分离株进行大环内酯敏感性检测。微生物学复发分离株也进行基因分型,以便与原始分离株进行比较。
180例患者完成了超过12个月的大环内酯/氮杂内酯多药治疗。180例患者中有154例(86%)痰培养转阴。克拉霉素或阿奇霉素方案之间的反应无差异。每日治疗(30例中的24例[80%])与间歇治疗(180例中的2例[1%])相比,治疗方案调整更为频繁(P = 0.0001)。治疗期间无患者出现大环内酯耐药。14%的患者在治疗期间出现微生物学复发:73%为再感染MAC分离株,27%为真正复发分离株(P = 0.03)。总体而言,84%的患者获得治疗成功(即痰培养转阴且无真正的微生物学复发)。治疗结束后,155例患者中有74例(48%)出现微生物学复发:75%为再感染分离株,25%为真正复发分离株。
当前基于大环内酯/氮杂内酯的NB MAC肺病治疗指南对大多数患者产生了良好的微生物学结果,且未导致大环内酯耐药。间歇治疗有效,耐受性明显优于每日治疗。治疗期间或治疗后微生物学复发很常见,且大多归因于再感染MAC基因型。