• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年龄是否应成为退行性腰椎手术的禁忌症?

Should age be a contraindication for degenerative lumbar surgery?

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salud MAR, PasseigMaritim 25-27, 08003, Barcelona, Spain,

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2014 May;23(5):1007-12. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3178-1. Epub 2014 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-014-3178-1
PMID:24458934
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare disability, quality of life and satisfaction outcomes between young people and elderly who were operated on for degenerative lumbar disease.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A database of 263 patients undergoing lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions was collected. There were 74 patients who were 65 years old or above and 189 who were below 65 who had complete preoperative and 2-year postoperative HRQOL data measures: ODI, SF-36 and COMI.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the outcomes between the two age groups (p > 0.05). An improvement from baseline in all quality of life measures in the two age groups was observed. A median improvement of 6.0 points was found in the ODI in the younger patients versus 12.0 in older ones. A median improvement in the SF36 physical component score of 6.95 was seen in the younger group while improvement was reported at 6.36 points in patients over 65. The SF36 mental component score improved by 4.48 points and 4.96 points, respectively. COMI improved a median of 1.2 points in both groups. In terms of satisfaction, 66.9 % of the younger patients were pleased or very pleased whereas this was found to be 59.7 % for the older group.

CONCLUSION

Older patients can see substantial clinical improvement after degenerative lumbar disease surgery similar to that obtained in younger patients in terms of quality of life and satisfaction. The improvement in terms of the disability is greater for older patients. Thus, age should not be a contraindication for this procedure.

摘要

介绍和目的

本研究旨在评估和比较因退行性腰椎疾病接受手术的年轻人和老年人的残疾、生活质量和满意度结果。

材料和方法

收集了 263 例退行性腰椎疾病患者的数据库。其中有 74 例患者年龄在 65 岁或以上,189 例患者年龄在 65 岁以下,他们具有完整的术前和 2 年术后 HRQOL 数据测量:ODI、SF-36 和 COMI。

结果

两组之间的结果没有显著差异(p>0.05)。在两个年龄组中,所有生活质量测量都从基线开始有所改善。年轻患者的 ODI 中位数改善了 6.0 分,而老年患者的 ODI 中位数改善了 12.0 分。年轻组 SF36 生理成分评分中位数改善 6.95 分,而 65 岁以上患者的改善程度为 6.36 分。SF36 心理成分评分分别提高了 4.48 点和 4.96 点。COMI 在两组中均改善了中位数 1.2 分。在满意度方面,66.9%的年轻患者感到满意或非常满意,而老年组的这一比例为 59.7%。

结论

退行性腰椎疾病手术后,老年患者在生活质量和满意度方面可以获得与年轻患者相似的显著临床改善。老年患者的残疾改善程度更大。因此,年龄不应成为该手术的禁忌症。

相似文献

1
Should age be a contraindication for degenerative lumbar surgery?年龄是否应成为退行性腰椎手术的禁忌症?
Eur Spine J. 2014 May;23(5):1007-12. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3178-1. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
2
Inadequacy of 3-month Oswestry Disability Index outcome for assessing individual longer-term patient experience after lumbar spine surgery.腰椎手术后3个月的奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数结果不足以评估个体患者的长期体验。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Aug;25(2):170-80. doi: 10.3171/2015.11.SPINE15872. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
3
Prognostic factors associated with best outcomes (minimal symptom state) following fusion for lumbar degenerative conditions.与腰椎退行性疾病融合后获得最佳结果(最小症状状态)相关的预后因素。
Spine J. 2019 Feb;19(2):187-190. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.06.348. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
4
Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.微创后路经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的长期耐久性:临床及影像学随访
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jul;24(5):288-96. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181f9a60a.
5
Incidental durotomy in degenerative lumbar spine surgery - a register study of 64,431 operations.退行性腰椎手术中的偶然硬脊膜切开术-64431 例手术的注册研究。
Spine J. 2019 Apr;19(4):624-630. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
6
A novel lumbar total joint replacement may be an improvement over fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions: a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes at one year.一种新型腰椎全关节置换术可能优于融合术治疗退行性腰椎疾病:一年时患者报告结局的比较分析。
Spine J. 2021 May;21(5):829-840. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.12.001. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
7
[Case control study on two different surgical approaches combined fixation with lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single segmental lumbar vertebra diseases].两种不同手术入路联合腰椎椎间融合内固定治疗单节段腰椎疾病的病例对照研究
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2017 May 25;30(5):417-425. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.05.006.
8
Construct validation of the Japanese Core Outcome Measures Index and the impact of diseases on patient-reported outcome measures in preoperative patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and disk herniation: a single-center observational study.日本核心结局指标指数的结构效度及疾病对腰椎管狭窄症和椎间盘突出症术前患者报告结局指标的影响:一项单中心观察性研究
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jun;33(6):2198-2205. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08148-2. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
9
What level of pain are patients happy to live with after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders?腰椎退行性疾病手术后,患者愿意忍受何种程度的疼痛?
Spine J. 2016 Apr;16(4 Suppl):S12-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.01.180. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
10
Clinical outcomes and sagittal alignment of single-level unilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a 4 to 5-year follow-up.单节段单侧器械辅助经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的临床疗效及矢状面排列:4至5年随访
Eur Spine J. 2015 Nov;24(11):2560-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3933-y. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Age diversity among older surgically treated patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective comparative study of early and late older adults.接受手术治疗的老年腰椎管狭窄症患者的年龄差异:早期和晚期老年人的回顾性比较研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Feb 28;26(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08456-8.
2
Instrumented lumbar fusion in patients over 75 years of age: is it worthwhile?-a comparative study of the improvement in quality of life between elderly and young patients.75岁以上患者的腰椎融合内固定术:是否值得?——老年与年轻患者生活质量改善情况的比较研究
J Spine Surg. 2023 Sep 22;9(3):247-258. doi: 10.21037/jss-22-115.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of long-term clinical outcome in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症患者的长期临床预后预测。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Dec;21(12):2611-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2424-7. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
2
Usefulness of the core outcome measures index in daily clinical practice for assessing patients with degenerative lumbar disease.核心结局指标指数在日常临床实践中对退行性腰椎疾病患者评估的实用性。
Adv Orthop. 2012;2012:474685. doi: 10.1155/2012/474685. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
3
Non-specific low back pain.非特异性下背痛。
Lumbar canal stenosis in "young" - How does it differ from that in "old" - An analysis of 116 surgically treated cases.
“年轻”患者的腰椎管狭窄症——与“老年”患者的有何不同——116例手术治疗病例分析
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2021 Apr-Jun;12(2):123-128. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_53_21. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
4
Are the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal/Posterior Lumbar Fusion Influenced by the Patient's Age or BMI?微创经椎间孔/后路腰椎融合术的疗效是否受患者年龄或 BMI 的影响?
Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;33(7):284-291. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001019.
5
Minor effect of loss to follow-up on outcome interpretation in the Swedish spine register.随访失访对瑞典脊柱登记处结局解读的影响较小。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Feb;29(2):213-220. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06181-0. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
6
Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.接受脊柱手术患者的生活质量:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Global Spine J. 2019 Feb;9(1):67-76. doi: 10.1177/2192568217701104. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
7
Is it safe to perform lumbar spine surgery on patients over eighty five?对85岁以上的患者进行腰椎手术安全吗?
Int Orthop. 2017 Oct;41(10):2091-2096. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3555-6. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
8
The outcome of lumbar disc herniation surgery is worse in old adults than in young adults.腰椎间盘突出症手术的结果在老年人中比在年轻人中更差。
Acta Orthop. 2016 Oct;87(5):516-21. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1205173. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
9
The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2014.米歇尔·贝努瓦和罗伯特·马尔霍兰德年度《欧洲脊柱杂志》述评:对《欧洲脊柱杂志》2014年“医学”类文章的一项调查
Eur Spine J. 2015 Jan;24(1):12-21. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3703-2. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):482-91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60610-7. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
4
Management of low back pain in primary care: a new approach.
Lancet. 2011 Oct 29;378(9802):1530-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61033-7. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
5
Predictors of surgical, general and follow-up complications in lumbar spinal stenosis relative to patient age as emerged from the Spine Tango Registry.从 Spine Tango 注册中心得出的与患者年龄相关的腰椎管狭窄症手术、一般和随访并发症的预测因素。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Mar;21(3):411-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2016-y. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
6
Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008.美国的脊柱融合术:1998 年至 2008 年趋势分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jan 1;37(1):67-76. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820cccfb.
7
Health-related quality of life after posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis in patients seventy-five years of age and older.七十五岁及以上患者行后路腰椎关节融合术后的健康相关生活质量。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jun;36(13):1065-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e8afa0.
8
Five-year outcome of surgical decompression of the lumbar spine without fusion.腰椎非融合手术减压的五年疗效
Eur Spine J. 2010 Nov;19(11):1883-91. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1535-2. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
9
Outcome of lumbar arthrodesis in patients sixty-five years of age or older.65岁及以上患者腰椎融合术的结果
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Apr;91(4):783-90. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00288.
10
Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis.定义腰椎融合术后的显著临床获益。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep;90(9):1839-47. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01095.