Olivry Thierry, Saridomichelakis Manolis, Nuttall Tim, Bensignor Emmanuel, Griffin Craig E, Hill Peter B
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, NC, 27607, USA; Center for Comparative Medicine and Translational Research, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27606, USA.
Vet Dermatol. 2014 Apr;25(2):77-85, e25. doi: 10.1111/vde.12107. Epub 2014 Jan 25.
Severity scales are used to grade skin lesions in clinical trials for treatment of dogs with atopic dermatitis (AD). At this time, only two scales have been validated, namely the Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index (CADESI)-3 and the Canine Atopic Dermatitis Lesion Index (CADLI). However, the high number of assessed sites makes the CADESI-3 impractical.
HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a fourth version of the CADESI that is simpler and quicker to administer.
Body sites, lesions and severity grades were revised by members of the International Committee on Allergic Diseases of Animals (ICADA). The newly designed CADESI-4 was tested for its validity (i.e. content, construct and criterion), reliability (i.e. inter- and intra-observer reliability and internal consistency), responsiveness (i.e. sensitivity to change) and time to administer. Disease severity benchmarks were chosen using receiver operating characteristic methodology.
The CADESI-4 was simplified in comparison to its previous version to comprise 20 body sites typically affected in atopic dogs. Three lesions (erythema, lichenification and alopecia/excoriation) were scored from 0 to 3 at each site. The CADESI-4 had satisfactory validity, reliability and sensitivity to change. On average, the time to administer a CADESI-4 was one-third that of a CADESI-3. Proposed benchmarks for mild, moderate and severe AD skin lesions are 10, 35 and 60, respectively.
The CADESI-4 is simpler to use and quicker to administer than its previous version. The ICADA recommends the CADESI-4 instead of the CADESI-3 to score skin lesions of AD in dogs enrolled in clinical trials.
在治疗犬特应性皮炎(AD)的临床试验中,严重程度量表用于对皮肤损伤进行分级。目前,仅有两种量表得到验证,即犬特应性皮炎范围和严重程度指数(CADESI)-3以及犬特应性皮炎损伤指数(CADLI)。然而,由于评估部位数量众多,CADESI-3在实际应用中不太方便。
假设/目标:本研究的目的是开发并验证一个更简单、实施更快的CADESI第四版。
动物过敏性疾病国际委员会(ICADA)的成员对身体部位、损伤和严重程度等级进行了修订。对新设计的CADESI-4进行了有效性(即内容、结构和标准)、可靠性(即观察者间和观察者内可靠性以及内部一致性)、反应性(即对变化的敏感性)和实施时间的测试。使用受试者工作特征方法选择疾病严重程度基准。
与前一版本相比,CADESI-4进行了简化,包括20个特应性犬通常受影响的身体部位。在每个部位对三种损伤(红斑、苔藓化和脱毛/擦伤)从0到3进行评分。CADESI-4具有令人满意的有效性、可靠性和对变化的敏感性。平均而言,实施CADESI-4的时间是CADESI-3的三分之一。建议的轻度、中度和重度AD皮肤损伤的基准分别为10、35和60。
CADESI-4比其前一版本使用更简单,实施更快。ICADA建议在临床试验中对犬AD皮肤损伤进行评分时使用CADESI-4而非CADESI-3。