Suppr超能文献

目标设定难度对乒乓球发球成功率的影响及自我调节的中介机制。

The Effect of Goal Setting Difficulty on Serving Success in Table Tennis and the Mediating Mechanism of Self-regulation.

机构信息

Tianjin University of Sport, Department of Health & Exercise Science.

出版信息

J Hum Kinet. 2012 Jun;33:173-85. doi: 10.2478/v10078-012-0056-y. Epub 2012 Jul 4.

Abstract

Goal setting difficulty has been shown to contribute to athletic performance (Burton et al., 2000). However, the potential mediating mechanism of goal difficulty on performance is unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to verify the effect of goal setting difficulty on serving success in table tennis, and determine if self-regulation is the mediating variable. The current study used serving success within a one minute period as the task, and the "Athlete's Self-regulation in Motor Learning" as the measurement tool. The experiment was designed as a 3 (serving frequency: 20/min, 23/min, and 26/min) × 2 (serving placement: left "small triangle", and right "small triangle") model. Participants (N = 60) in the current study were students from a physical education school. These participants were randomly assigned into the experimental and control groups. After the intervention, differences in self-regulation (p < 0.001) and serving success (p < 0.05) between the experimental and control groups were significant. For the experimental groups, there was a significant difference in self-regulation (p < 0.001) and serving success (p < 0.05) before and after the experiment. Serving frequency had a main effect on self-regulation (F (5, 24) = 12.398, p < 0.01) and serving success (F (5, 24) = 37.601, p < 0.001). Moderately difficult goal setting contributed to athletic performance. Regression analysis using bootstrapping methods revealed that self-regulation partially mediated the relationship between the two.

摘要

目标设定难度已被证明会影响运动表现(Burton 等人,2000)。然而,目标难度对表现的潜在中介机制尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在验证目标设定难度对乒乓球发球成功率的影响,并确定自我调节是否是中介变量。本研究使用一分钟内的发球成功率作为任务,使用“运动员在运动学习中的自我调节”作为测量工具。实验设计为 3(发球频率:20/min、23/min 和 26/min)×2(发球位置:左“小三角”和右“小三角”)模型。本研究的参与者(N=60)是体育学校的学生。这些参与者被随机分配到实验组和对照组。干预后,实验组和对照组的自我调节(p<0.001)和发球成功率(p<0.05)存在显著差异。对于实验组,实验前后自我调节(p<0.001)和发球成功率(p<0.05)存在显著差异。发球频率对自我调节(F(5,24)=12.398,p<0.01)和发球成功率(F(5,24)=37.601,p<0.001)有主要影响。适度困难的目标设定有助于提高运动表现。使用自举法的回归分析表明,自我调节部分中介了两者之间的关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f0/3588684/91024ac71f9d/jhk-33-173f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验