Norwitz Errol R, Levy Brynn
Tufts University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Tufts Medical Center Boston, MA.
Department of Pathology & Cell Biology, Clinical Cytogenetics Laboratory, Division of Personalized Genomic Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center & New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York, NY.
Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2013;6(2):48-62.
Prenatal detection of chromosome abnormalities has been offered for more than 40 years, first by amniocentesis in the early 1970s and additionally by chorionic villus sampling (CVS) in the early 1980s. Given the well-recognized association between increasing maternal age and trisomy,1-3 the primary utilization of prenatal testing has been by older mothers. This has drastically reduced the incidence of aneuploid children born to older mothers.4 Although younger women have relatively low risks of conceiving a child with aneuploidy, the majority of pregnant women are in their late teens, 20s, and early 30s. As such, most viable aneuploid babies are born to these younger mothers.5 Invasive prenatal diagnosis (CVS and amniocentesis) is not a feasible option for all low-risk mothers, as these procedures carry a small but finite risk and would ultimately cause more miscarriages than they would detect aneuploidy. For this reason, a number of noninvasive tests have been developed-including first-trimester risk assessment at 11 to 14 weeks, maternal serum analyte (quad) screening at 15 to 20 weeks, and sonographic fetal structural survey at 18 to 22 weeks-all of which are designed to give a woman an adjusted (more accurate) estimate of having an aneuploid fetus using as baseline her a priori age-related risk. Ultrasound and maternal serum analysis are considered screening procedures and both require follow up by CVS or amniocentesis in screen-positive cases for a definitive diagnosis of a chromosome abnormality in the fetus. The ability to isolate fetal cells and fetal DNA from maternal blood during pregnancy has opened up exciting opportunities for improved noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT). Direct analysis of fetal cells from maternal circulation has been challenging given the scarcity of fetal cells in maternal blood (1:10,000-1:1,000,000) and the focus has shifted to the analysis of cell-free fetal DNA, which is found at a concentration almost 25 times higher than that available from nucleated blood cells extracted from a similar volume of whole maternal blood. There have now been numerous reports on the use of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for NIPT for chromosomal aneuploidies-especially trisomy (an extra copy of a chromosome) or monosomy (a missing chromosome)-and a number of commercial products are already being marketed for this indication. This article reviews the various techniques being used to analyze cell-free DNA in the maternal circulation for the prenatal detection of chromosome abnormalities and the evidence in support of each. A number of areas of ongoing controversy are addressed, including the timing of maternal blood sampling, the need for genetic counseling, and the use of confirmatory invasive testing. Future applications for this technology are also reviewed.
染色体异常的产前检测已经开展了40多年,最初是在20世纪70年代初通过羊膜穿刺术进行,随后在20世纪80年代初又增加了绒毛取样(CVS)。鉴于高龄产妇与三体综合征之间已得到充分认识的关联,产前检测的主要对象一直是年龄较大的母亲。这已大幅降低了高龄产妇所生孩子的非整倍体发生率。尽管年轻女性怀上非整倍体胎儿的风险相对较低,但大多数孕妇处于十八九岁、二十多岁和三十出头的年龄段。因此,大多数能存活的非整倍体婴儿是由这些年轻母亲所生。侵入性产前诊断(CVS和羊膜穿刺术)并非所有低风险母亲都可行的选择,因为这些操作有小但确切的风险,最终导致的流产会比检测出的非整倍体更多。出于这个原因,已经开发了一些非侵入性检测方法,包括孕11至14周的孕早期风险评估、孕15至20周的母体血清分析物(四联)筛查以及孕18至22周的超声胎儿结构检查,所有这些检测方法的设计目的都是以孕妇的先验年龄相关风险为基线,为其提供胎儿为非整倍体的调整后(更准确)估计值。超声和母体血清分析被视为筛查程序,在筛查呈阳性的情况下都需要通过CVS或羊膜穿刺术进行后续检查,以明确诊断胎儿染色体异常。孕期从母体血液中分离胎儿细胞和胎儿DNA的能力为改进非侵入性产前检测(NIPT)带来了令人兴奋的机会。鉴于母体血液中胎儿细胞稀少(1:10,000 - 1:1,000,000),直接分析母体循环中的胎儿细胞具有挑战性,目前重点已转向分析游离胎儿DNA,其浓度几乎比从相同体积的全母体血液中提取的有核血细胞中的浓度高25倍。现在已有大量关于使用游离DNA(cfDNA)进行染色体非整倍体NIPT的报道,尤其是三体(染色体额外拷贝)或单体(染色体缺失),并且已有多种商业产品针对这一适应症上市。本文综述了用于分析母体循环中游离DNA以进行染色体异常产前检测的各种技术以及支持每种技术的证据。还讨论了一些存在争议的领域,包括母体血液取样的时间、遗传咨询的必要性以及确认性侵入性检测的使用。此外,还综述了该技术的未来应用。