Suppr超能文献

撤销绩效指标:英国质量与结果框架下全科医疗绩效的回顾性分析

Withdrawing performance indicators: retrospective analysis of general practice performance under UK Quality and Outcomes Framework.

作者信息

Kontopantelis Evangelos, Springate David, Reeves David, Ashcroft Darren M, Valderas Jose M, Doran Tim

机构信息

NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2014 Jan 27;348:g330. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g330.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of withdrawing incentives on recorded quality of care, in the context of the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework pay for performance scheme.

DESIGN

Retrospective longitudinal study.

SETTING

Data for 644 general practices, from 2004/05 to 2011/12, extracted from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients registered with any of the practices over the study period-13,772,992 in total.

INTERVENTION

Removal of financial incentives for aspects of care for patients with asthma, coronary heart disease, diabetes, stroke, and psychosis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Performance on eight clinical quality indicators withdrawn from a national incentive scheme: influenza immunisation (asthma) and lithium treatment monitoring (psychosis), removed in April 2006; blood pressure monitoring (coronary heart disease, diabetes, stroke), cholesterol concentration monitoring (coronary heart disease, diabetes), and blood glucose monitoring (diabetes), removed in April 2011. Multilevel mixed effects multiple linear regression models were used to quantify the effect of incentive withdrawal.

RESULTS

Mean levels of performance were generally stable after the removal of the incentives, in both the short and long term. For the two indicators removed in April 2006, levels in 2011/12 were very close to 2005/06 levels, although a small but statistically significant drop was estimated for influenza immunisation. For five of the six indicators withdrawn from April 2011, no significant effect on performance was seen following removal and differences between predicted and observed scores were small. Performance on related outcome indicators retained in the scheme (such as blood pressure control) was generally unaffected.

CONCLUSIONS

Following the removal of incentives, levels of performance across a range of clinical activities generally remained stable. This indicates that health benefits from incentive schemes can potentially be increased by periodically replacing existing indicators with new indicators relating to alternative aspects of care. However, all aspects of care investigated remained indirectly or partly incentivised in other indicators, and further work is needed to assess the generalisability of the findings when incentives are fully withdrawn.

摘要

目的

在英国质量与结果框架绩效薪酬计划的背景下,研究取消激励措施对所记录的医疗质量的影响。

设计

回顾性纵向研究。

设置

从临床实践研究数据链中提取2004/05至2011/12期间644家全科诊所的数据。

参与者

在研究期间在任何一家诊所注册的所有患者,总计13,772,992人。

干预措施

取消对哮喘、冠心病、糖尿病、中风和精神病患者护理方面的经济激励。

主要结局指标

从国家激励计划中取消的八项临床质量指标的表现:流感疫苗接种(哮喘)和锂治疗监测(精神病),于2006年4月取消;血压监测(冠心病、糖尿病、中风)、胆固醇浓度监测(冠心病、糖尿病)和血糖监测(糖尿病),于2011年4月取消。使用多水平混合效应多元线性回归模型来量化取消激励措施的影响。

结果

在取消激励措施后,无论短期还是长期,平均表现水平总体上保持稳定。对于2006年4月取消的两项指标,2011/12年的水平与2005/06年的水平非常接近,尽管估计流感疫苗接种有小幅但具有统计学意义的下降。对于2011年4月取消的六项指标中的五项,取消后对表现没有显著影响,预测分数与观察分数之间的差异很小。该计划中保留的相关结局指标(如血压控制)的表现总体上未受影响。

结论

取消激励措施后,一系列临床活动的表现水平总体上保持稳定。这表明,通过定期用与护理其他方面相关的新指标替代现有指标,激励计划的健康效益可能会增加。然而,所调查的护理的所有方面在其他指标中仍受到间接或部分激励,当激励措施完全取消时,需要进一步开展工作来评估研究结果的普遍性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ef/4793622/03a1a249f4bc/kone015312.f1_default.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验