Medical University of SC, Department of Public Health Sciences, 135 Cannon Street, Suite 303, MSC 835, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Medical University of SC, Department of Public Health Sciences, 135 Cannon Street, Suite 303, MSC 835, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Epilepsy Behav. 2014 Mar;32:42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.12.035. Epub 2014 Jan 25.
While traumatic brain injury (TBI) can lead to epilepsy, individuals with preexisting epilepsy or seizure disorder (ESD), depending on the type of epilepsy and the degree of seizure control, may have a greater risk of TBI from seizure activity or medication side effects. The joint occurrence of ESD and TBI can complicate recovery as signs and symptoms of TBI may be mistaken for postictal effects. Those with ESD are predicted to experience more deleterious outcomes either because of having a more severe TBI or because of the cumulative effects of repetitive TBI.
We conducted a case-control study of all emergency department visits and hospital discharges for TBI from 1998 through 2011 in a statewide population. The severity of TBI, repetitive TBI, and other demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between persons with TBI with preexisting ESD (cases) and those without (controls). Significant differences in proportions were evaluated with confidence intervals. Logistic regression was used to examine the association of the independent variables with ESD.
During the study period, 236,164 individuals sustained TBI, 5646 (2.4%) of which had preexisting ESD. After adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics, cases were more likely to have sustained a severe TBI (OR=1.49; 95% CI=1.38-1.60) and have had repetitive TBI (OR=1.54; 95% CI=1.41-1.69).
The consequences of TBI may be greater in individuals with ESD owing to the potential for a more severe or repetitive TBI. Seizure control is paramount, and aggressive management of comorbid conditions among persons with ESD and increased awareness of the hazard of repetitive TBI is warranted. Furthermore, future studies are needed to examine the long-term outcomes of cases in comparison with controls to determine if the higher risk of severe or repetitive TBI translates into permanent deficits.
虽然创伤性脑损伤(TBI)可导致癫痫,但患有癫痫或癫痫发作障碍(ESD)的个体,具体取决于癫痫的类型和癫痫发作控制程度,可能因癫痫发作活动或药物副作用而面临更大的 TBI 风险。ESD 和 TBI 的共同发生会使康复复杂化,因为 TBI 的体征和症状可能会被误认为是癫痫发作后的影响。由于 TBI 更严重或由于重复性 TBI 的累积效应,预测那些患有 ESD 的人会出现更多的不良后果。
我们对全州范围内 1998 年至 2011 年期间所有因 TBI 而就诊的急诊和出院患者进行了病例对照研究。比较了 TBI 合并和不合并既往 ESD(病例)患者的 TBI 严重程度、重复性 TBI 以及其他人口统计学和临床特征。使用置信区间评估比例的显著差异。使用逻辑回归检查独立变量与 ESD 的关联。
在研究期间,共有 236164 人因 TBI 就诊,其中 5646 人(2.4%)既往患有 ESD。在调整人口统计学和临床特征后,病例组更有可能患有严重 TBI(OR=1.49;95%CI=1.38-1.60)和重复性 TBI(OR=1.54;95%CI=1.41-1.69)。
由于潜在的更严重或重复性 TBI,患有 ESD 的个体的 TBI 后果可能更大。控制癫痫至关重要,需要积极管理患有 ESD 的患者的合并症,并提高对重复性 TBI 危害的认识。此外,需要进一步研究以比较病例与对照组的长期结果,以确定更高的严重或重复性 TBI 风险是否转化为永久性缺陷。