Grassi-Oliveira Rodrigo, Cogo-Moreira Hugo, Salum Giovanni Abrahão, Brietzke Elisa, Viola Thiago Wendt, Manfro Gisele Gus, Kristensen Christian Haag, Arteche Adriane Xavier
Centre of Studies and Research in Traumatic Stress, Post-Graduate Program in Psychology, Pontifical Catholic University of the Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 27;9(1):e87118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087118. eCollection 2014.
The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) is internationally accepted as a key tool for the assessment of childhood abuse and neglect experiences. However, there are relative few psychometric studies available and some authors have proposed two different factor solutions. We examined the dimensional structure and internal consistency of the Brazilian version of the CTQ. A total of 1,925 participants from eight different clinical and non-clinical samples including adolescents, adults and elders were considered in this study. First, we performed Confirmatory Factor Analysis to investigate the goodness of fit of the two proposed competitive factor structure models for the CTQ. We also investigated the internal consistency of all factors. Second, multi-group analyses were used to investigate measurement invariance and population heterogeneity across age groups and sex. Our findings revealed that the alternative factor structure as opposed to the original factor structure was the most appropriate model within adolescents and adults Brazilian samples. We provide further evidence for the validity and reliability of the CTQ within the Brazilian samples and report that the alternative model showed an improvement in fit indexes and may be a better alternative over the original model.
儿童期创伤问卷(CTQ)在国际上被公认为评估儿童期虐待和忽视经历的关键工具。然而,现有的心理测量学研究相对较少,一些作者提出了两种不同的因子解决方案。我们研究了巴西版CTQ的维度结构和内部一致性。本研究共纳入了来自八个不同临床和非临床样本(包括青少年、成年人和老年人)的1925名参与者。首先,我们进行了验证性因子分析,以研究CTQ两种提出的竞争性因子结构模型的拟合优度。我们还研究了所有因子的内部一致性。其次,采用多组分析来研究不同年龄组和性别的测量不变性和人群异质性。我们的研究结果表明,与原始因子结构相比,替代因子结构是巴西青少年和成人样本中最合适的模型。我们为CTQ在巴西样本中的有效性和可靠性提供了进一步的证据,并报告替代模型在拟合指数上有所改善,可能是比原始模型更好的选择。