Kim Hye-In, Kim Shin-Woo, Chang Hyun-Ha, Lee Jong-Myung, Peck Kyong Ran
Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Infect Chemother. 2013 Dec;45(4):394-405. doi: 10.3947/ic.2013.45.4.394. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
The causative pathogens of and prevalence of antibiotic resistance in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) varies across countries. We evaluated the patterns of antibiotic prescriptions for adult CAP patients, and physician satisfaction with the form and content of the 2009 Korean CAP treatment guidelines.
We designed an online survey for clinical physicians who treat CAP (infectious disease specialists, pulmonologists, and other physicians). We e-mailed the online survey to physicians and gathered results from December 2011 to January 2012, and then analyzed their responses.
A total of 157 physicians responded to our survey: 61 (38.9%) infectious disease specialists, 33 (21.0%) pulmonologists, and 63 (40.1%) other physicians. Two-thirds (96/157, 61.2%) had positions in tertiary and secondary hospitals; the others (61, 38.8%) worked in primary clinics (hospitals and private clinics). One hundred and eight (68.8%) were aware of the Korean CAP clinical guidelines; of these, 98 (62.4%) applied the guidelines to their practice. Among physicians using them, 86.7% (85/98) reported the guidelines to be most useful for empirical selection of antibiotics, and 75.2% (118/157) said the guidelines were useful and satisfactory. Sixty-eight (43.3%) respondents indicated that they had not used aminoglycosides as an initial empirical CAP treatment, while 51 (32.5%) had combined aminoglycosides with other antibiotics to treat patients with CAP. Seventy-three (46.5%) physicians often combined macrolides with β-lactam antibiotics for empirical treatment of CAP, and 21 (13.4%) reported using macrolide monotherapy (which is not recommended in the 2009 Korean CAP treatment guidelines) for CAP patients. The most commonly used β-lactams were third-generation cephalosporins (72, 45.9%) and ampicillin/sulbactam or amoxicillin/clavulanate (28, 17.8%).
Some physicians remain unaware of the 2009 Korean treatment guidelines for CAP and do not use them in clinical practice. In addition, aminoglycoside combination therapy is frequently and inappropriately used in practice. In some cases, CAP is treated with macrolide monotherapy. Thus, the Korean CAP clinical guidelines must be more aggressively and continuously publicized.
社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的致病病原体及抗生素耐药性的流行情况在各国有所不同。我们评估了成年CAP患者的抗生素处方模式,以及医生对2009年韩国CAP治疗指南的形式和内容的满意度。
我们为治疗CAP的临床医生(传染病专家、肺科医生和其他医生)设计了一项在线调查。我们通过电子邮件向医生发送在线调查问卷,并于2011年12月至2012年1月收集结果,然后分析他们的回复。
共有157名医生回复了我们的调查:61名(38.9%)传染病专家,33名(21.0%)肺科医生,63名(40.1%)其他医生。三分之二(96/157,61.2%)在三级和二级医院任职;其余(61名,38.8%)在基层诊所(医院和私人诊所)工作。108名(68.8%)知晓韩国CAP临床指南;其中,98名(62.4%)在临床实践中应用了该指南。在使用该指南的医生中,86.7%(85/98)报告该指南对经验性选择抗生素最为有用,75.2%(118/157)表示该指南有用且令人满意。68名(43.3%)受访者表示他们没有将氨基糖苷类药物作为CAP初始经验性治疗用药,而51名(32.5%)曾将氨基糖苷类药物与其他抗生素联合用于治疗CAP患者。73名(46.5%)医生经常将大环内酯类药物与β-内酰胺类抗生素联合用于CAP的经验性治疗,21名(13.4%)报告对CAP患者使用大环内酯类单药治疗(2009年韩国CAP治疗指南不推荐)。最常用的β-内酰胺类药物是第三代头孢菌素(72名,45.9%)和氨苄西林/舒巴坦或阿莫西林/克拉维酸(28名,17.8%)。
一些医生仍不了解2009年韩国CAP治疗指南,且未在临床实践中使用。此外,氨基糖苷类联合治疗在实践中经常被不当使用。在某些情况下,CAP采用大环内酯类单药治疗。因此,韩国CAP临床指南必须更积极且持续地进行宣传。