From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC 3808, Durham, NC 27710.
Radiology. 2014 May;271(2):426-34. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131988. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
To determine whether the use of a multiple arterial phase imaging technique provides adequate image quality in patients experiencing transient severe motion (TSM) in the arterial phase on abdominal magnetic resonance (MR) images obtained with gadoxetate disodium.
This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and was compliant with HIPAA. The requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. Five hundred forty-nine consecutive MR examinations were evaluated, 345 performed with gadoxetate disodium and 204 performed with gadobenate dimeglumine. All examinations included single-breath-hold triple arterial phase acquisition. Five radiologists blinded to the contrast material rated motion on a scale of 1 (no motion) to 5 (nondiagnostic images) for the precontrast phase, the three arterial phases, the portal venous phase, and the late dynamic phase. Adequacy of late hepatic arterial timing was also rated for the each of the three arterial phases. Mean motion scores were compared by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The number of patients with TSM, as well as the number of those with "adequate" arterial phases, was compared with the χ(2) or Fisher exact test, as appropriate.
Mean motion scores in all three arterial phases in the gadoxetate disodium cohort were significantly worse than those in the gadobenate dimeglumine cohort (P < .005). TSM occurred at a higher rate with gadoxetate disodium than with gadobenate dimeglumine (10.7% [37 of 345 examinations] vs 0.5% [one of 204 examinations], P < .001). However, 30 of 37 examinations affected by TSM had at least one well-timed arterial phase with a mean motion score of 3 or less and were thus considered adequate.
Use of single-breath-hold multiple arterial phase acquisition in abdominal MR imaging with gadoxetate disodium recovers most arterial phases that would otherwise have been compromised by transient motion.
在使用钆塞酸二钠进行腹部磁共振成像(MR)检查时,如果患者在动脉期出现短暂剧烈运动(TSM),确定使用多动脉期成像技术是否能提供足够的图像质量。
本回顾性研究经机构审查委员会批准,并符合 HIPAA 规定。豁免了获得知情同意的要求。共评估了 549 例连续的 MR 检查,其中 345 例使用钆塞酸二钠进行,204 例使用钆贝葡胺进行。所有检查均包括单次屏气三动脉期采集。5 名放射科医生在不知道对比剂的情况下,对平扫期、3 个动脉期、门静脉期和晚期动态期的运动程度进行 1(无运动)至 5(无法诊断的图像)的评分。还对每个动脉期的晚期肝动脉定时进行了充分性评估。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较平均运动评分。使用 χ²或 Fisher 确切检验比较 TSM 患者的数量以及“足够”动脉期患者的数量。
钆塞酸二钠组的所有 3 个动脉期的平均运动评分均明显差于钆贝葡胺组(P <.005)。与钆贝葡胺组(0.5%[204 例检查中的 1 例])相比,钆塞酸二钠组 TSM 的发生率更高(10.7%[345 例检查中的 37 例],P <.001)。然而,受 TSM 影响的 37 例检查中有 30 例至少有一个动脉期时间合适,运动评分在 3 分以下,因此被认为是充分的。
在使用钆塞酸二钠进行腹部 MR 成像时,使用单次屏气多动脉期采集技术可以恢复大多数动脉期,否则这些动脉期会因短暂运动而受到影响。