From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC 3808, Durham, NC 27710 (M.R.B., D.L., D.M., T.A.J.); and Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI (P.C., M.S.D., H.K.H.).
Radiology. 2015 Jan;274(1):141-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140386. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
To determine, in a dual-center setting, whether patients who experience transient severe motion ( TSM transient severe motion ) in the arterial phase during gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are at higher risk for a subsequent episode of TSM transient severe motion than patients who do not have TSM transient severe motion during initial gadoxetate disodium administration.
Institutional review board approval was obtained for this retrospective, multi-institutional HIPAA-compliant study. The requirement for informed consent was waived. One hundred seventy patients each underwent two MR imaging examinations with bolus injection of gadoxetate disodium at one of two sites. Three radiologists reviewed the examinations at each site for TSM transient severe motion , based on severe arterial phase motion, despite minimal motion in the other dynamic phases. The occurrence rate of TSM transient severe motion in the second examination was compared between patients who had TSM transient severe motion in their first examination and those who did not by using the χ(2) or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals ( CI confidence interval s) were calculated.
TSM transient severe motion rates in second examinations were significantly higher for patients who had TSM transient severe motion in their first examination: site 1, 67% (six of nine) vs 4% (three of 69) (P < .0001); site 2, 60% (three of five) vs 6% (five of 87) (P < .005); and both sites, 64% (nine of 14) vs 5% (eight of 156) (P < .0001). Relative risks were 15 for site 1 (95% CI confidence interval : 5, 51), 10 for site 2 (95% CI confidence interval : 3, 32), and 13 for both sites (95% CI confidence interval : 6, 27).
Patients who experience TSM transient severe motion during gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging are at significantly and substantially higher risk for TSM transient severe motion in the next gadoxetate disodium-enhanced examination compared with patients who do not have TSM transient severe motion during their initial gadoxetate disodium administration.
在双中心环境中确定在钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振成像(MR)动脉期经历短暂剧烈运动(TSM)的患者与初始钆塞酸二钠给药期间无 TSM 的患者相比,随后发生 TSM 的风险是否更高。
本回顾性多中心 HIPAA 合规研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准。放弃了知情同意的要求。每个患者都在两个地点中的一个地点进行了两次 MR 成像检查,同时进行了钆塞酸二钠的团注注射。三位放射科医生根据严重的动脉期运动,即使在其他动态阶段运动最小,在每个部位的检查中对 TSM 进行了回顾性分析。根据第一次检查中是否有 TSM 的患者与没有 TSM 的患者的第二次检查中 TSM 的发生率,使用 χ(2)或 Fisher 确切检验(如适用)进行比较。计算相对风险和 95%置信区间(CI 置信区间)。
在第一次检查中发生 TSM 的患者在第二次检查中 TSM 发生率明显更高:部位 1,67%(9/13)与 4%(3/69)(P<.0001);部位 2,60%(3/5)与 6%(5/87)(P<.005);两个部位均为 64%(9/14)与 5%(8/156)(P<.0001)。部位 1 的相对风险为 15(95%CI:5,51),部位 2 的相对风险为 10(95%CI:3,32),两个部位的相对风险为 13(95%CI:6,27)。
在钆塞酸二钠增强 MR 成像期间发生 TSM 的患者与初始钆塞酸二钠给药期间无 TSM 的患者相比,在下一次钆塞酸二钠增强检查中发生 TSM 的风险显著且显著增加。