• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

取消医学院入学面试与入学学生中的性别偏见有关。

Removing the interview for medical school selection is associated with gender bias among enrolled students.

机构信息

Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2014 Feb 3;200(2):96-9. doi: 10.5694/mja13.10103.

DOI:10.5694/mja13.10103
PMID:24484112
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To report, and determine reasons for, a change in the gender ratio observed among enrolled medical students after removal of the interview from the selection process.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study of 4051 students admitted to the medical program at the University of Queensland between 2004 and 2012. Students are enrolled either directly as graduates or via a school-leaver pathway.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in proportions of male and female students over time, and gender-specific scores in the three sections of the GAMSAT (Graduate Medical School Admissions Test).

RESULTS

Between 2004 and 2008 (when an interview was part of the selection process), 891 enrolled students (51.4%) were male, whereas between 2009 and 2012 (no interview), 1134 (57.7%; P < 0.001) were male. This change in gender ratio was limited to domestic direct graduate-entry students, and the male proportion in this group rose from 50.9% (705 students) before the interview was removed to 64.0% (514 students; P < 0.001) after removal of the interview (reaching 73.8% in 2012). Between 2004 and 2012, male students consistently performed better than female students on GAMSAT section III (mean score, 71.5 v 68.5; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The proportion of males enrolled in the medical program at this university increased markedly after removal of the interview from the selection process. This change is limited to domestic direct graduate-entry students, and seems to be due to higher scores by male students in section III of the GAMSAT. The interview may play an important role in ensuring gender equity in selection, and medical schools should carefully monitor the consequences of changes to selection policy.

摘要

目的

报告并确定在选拔过程中取消面试后,入读医学生的性别比例发生变化的原因。

设计、地点和参与者:对 2004 年至 2012 年间在昆士兰大学入读医学项目的 4051 名学生进行的横断面研究。学生通过直接毕业生途径或中学毕业生途径入学。

主要观察指标

随着时间的推移,男女生比例的变化,以及 GAMSAT(研究生医学院入学考试)三个部分的性别特异性分数。

结果

在 2004 年至 2008 年(面试是选拔过程的一部分)期间,有 891 名入学学生(51.4%)为男性,而在 2009 年至 2012 年(无面试)期间,有 1134 名(57.7%;P <0.001)为男性。这种性别比例的变化仅限于国内直接入学的毕业生,该组中男性的比例从取消面试前的 50.9%(705 名学生)上升到取消面试后的 64.0%(514 名学生;P <0.001),并在 2012 年达到 73.8%。在 2004 年至 2012 年期间,男生在 GAMSAT 第三部分的得分始终高于女生(平均分数,71.5 比 68.5;P <0.001)。

结论

在选拔过程中取消面试后,入读本大学医学项目的男生比例显著增加。这种变化仅限于国内直接入学的毕业生,似乎是由于 GAMSAT 第三部分的男生得分较高所致。面试可能在确保选拔中的性别平等方面发挥重要作用,医学院校应仔细监测选拔政策变化的后果。

相似文献

1
Removing the interview for medical school selection is associated with gender bias among enrolled students.取消医学院入学面试与入学学生中的性别偏见有关。
Med J Aust. 2014 Feb 3;200(2):96-9. doi: 10.5694/mja13.10103.
2
Removing the interview for medical school selection is associated with gender bias among enrolled students.
Med J Aust. 2014 Aug 4;201(3):144. doi: 10.5694/mja14.00660.
3
Removing the interview for medical school selection is associated with gender bias among enrolled students.
Med J Aust. 2014 Aug 4;201(3):143-4. doi: 10.5694/mja14.00428.
4
Removing the interview for medical school selection is associated with gender bias among enrolled students.
Med J Aust. 2014 Jun 2;200(10):580. doi: 10.5694/mja14.00185.
5
Predicting academic outcomes in an Australian graduate entry medical programme.预测澳大利亚研究生入学医学项目的学业成绩。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Feb 15;14:31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-31.
6
Predicting success in medical school: a longitudinal study of common Australian student selection tools.预测医学院学习的成功:对澳大利亚常用学生选拔工具的纵向研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 22;16:187. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0692-3.
7
Testing for medical school selection: What are prospective doctors' experiences and perceptions of the GAMSAT and what are the consequences of testing?医学选拔考试的测试:未来医生对 GAMSAT 的体验和看法是什么,以及测试的后果是什么?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 Aug;23(3):533-546. doi: 10.1007/s10459-018-9811-8. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
8
Selecting medical students for academic and attitudinal outcomes in a Catholic medical school.在天主教医学院校中选择医学生以获得学业和态度方面的成果。
Med J Aust. 2010 Sep 20;193(6):347-50. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03947.x.
9
Medical school selection criteria and the prediction of academic performance.医学院校选拔标准与学业成绩预测
Med J Aust. 2008 Mar 17;188(6):349-54. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01653.x.
10
Clinical communication skills learning outcomes among first year medical students are consistent irrespective of participation in an interview for admission to medical school.无论是否参加医学院入学面试,一年级医学生的临床沟通技能学习成果都是一致的。
Med Teach. 2014 Jul;36(7):640-2. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.907880. Epub 2014 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining interviewer bias in medical school admissions: The interplay between applicant and interviewer gender and its effects on interview outcomes.医学专业招生中的面试官偏见研究:申请人和面试官的性别相互作用及其对面试结果的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 26;19(8):e0309293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309293. eCollection 2024.
2
The impact of the medical school admissions interview: a systematic review.医学院校招生面试的影响:系统评价。
Can Med Educ J. 2024 Feb 29;15(1):68-74. doi: 10.36834/cmej.76138. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Medical school selection criteria as predictors of medical student empathy: a cross-sectional study of medical students, Ireland.
作为医学生同理心预测指标的医学院校选拔标准:爱尔兰医学生的横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 1;7(7):e016076. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016076.
4
Medical school admission test: advantages for students whose parents are medical doctors?医学院入学考试:父母是医生的学生有优势吗?
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Apr 23;15:81. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0354-x.
5
Comparison of performance in a four year graduate entry medical programme and a traditional five/six year programme.四年制医学研究生入学项目与传统五/六年制项目的表现比较。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Dec 10;14:248. doi: 10.1186/s12909-014-0248-3.