• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Medical school admission test: advantages for students whose parents are medical doctors?医学院入学考试:父母是医生的学生有优势吗?
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Apr 23;15:81. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0354-x.
2
How Medical School Applicant Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status Relate to Multiple Mini-Interview-Based Admissions Outcomes: Findings From One Medical School.医学院申请者的种族、族裔和社会经济地位与基于多轮迷你面试的录取结果之间的关系:来自一所医学院的研究结果。
Acad Med. 2015 Dec;90(12):1667-74. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000766.
3
[Medical school admission test at the University of Goettingen - which applicants will benefit?].[哥廷根大学医学院入学考试——哪些申请者将从中受益?]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(10):609-17. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.09.024. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
4
Relationship of academic success of medical students with motivation and pre-admission grades.医学生学业成就与学习动机及入学前成绩的关系。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013 Jan;23(1):31-6.
5
Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison.多轮迷你面试与传统面试:利益相关者可接受性比较。
Med Educ. 2009 Oct;43(10):993-1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03447.x.
6
Ethnic and social disparities in performance on medical school selection criteria.医学学校选拔标准上的种族和社会差异。
Med Educ. 2015 Jan;49(1):124-33. doi: 10.1111/medu.12536.
7
Are Female Applicants Rated Higher Than Males on the Multiple Mini-Interview? Findings From the University of Calgary.在多重迷你面试中,女性申请者的评分是否高于男性?来自卡尔加里大学的研究结果。
Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):841-846. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001466.
8
The Effect of Differential Weighting of Academics, Experiences, and Competencies Measured by Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) on Race and Ethnicity of Cohorts Accepted to One Medical School.多迷你面试(MMI)所衡量的学术、经历和能力的差异加权对一所医学院录取学生群体的种族和民族的影响。
Acad Med. 2015 Dec;90(12):1651-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000960.
9
The Diversity and Success of Medical School Applicants With Scores in the Middle Third of the MCAT Score Scale.《MCAT 成绩处于中等三分之一区间的医学生申请者的多样性与成功》。
Acad Med. 2020 Mar;95(3):344-350. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002941.
10
The applicant pool: the genesis of the physician pipeline.申请人库:医生人才输送渠道的起源。
J Ky Med Assoc. 2008 Jun;106(6):263-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Parental medical background and pre-admission preparedness in China's medical student selection.中国医学生选拔中的父母医学背景及入院前准备情况
Med Educ Online. 2025 Dec;30(1):2534048. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2025.2534048. Epub 2025 Jul 15.
2
Do physicians' children perform differently in medical education? A multi-center field study in China.医生的子女在医学教育中的表现是否不同?一项在中国的多中心实地研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 8;25(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07053-6.
3
Empathy Among Physicians and Nurses in Japan: A Nationwide Cross-sectional Study.日本医生和护士的同理心:一项全国性横断面研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 May;39(6):960-968. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08620-1. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
4
The challenges of widening access to the medical profession: how to facilitate medical careers for those at a genuine disadvantage.扩大医学专业准入范围面临的挑战:如何为那些处于真正不利地位的人提供医学职业便利。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2019 Jul 5;7:277. doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000277.2. eCollection 2018.
5
Selection and lottery in medical school admissions: who gains and who loses?医学院招生中的选拔与抽签:谁受益谁受损?
MedEdPublish (2016). 2018 Dec 4;7:271. doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000271.1. eCollection 2018.
6
Prosocial modelling matters: the association between parent and faculty involvement in fighting COVID-19 with medical students' career commitment.亲社会榜样很重要:家长和教职工参与抗击 COVID-19 对医学生职业承诺的影响。
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):3146-3156. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2139410.
7
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on UK medical school widening access schemes: disruption, support and a virtual student led initiative.COVID-19 大流行对英国医学院扩大招生计划的影响:中断、支持和虚拟学生主导的倡议。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jun 15;21(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02770-0.
8
An investigation of the intention and reasons of senior high school students in China to choose medical school.对中国高中生选择医学院校的意愿及原因的调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Apr 26;21(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02677-w.
9
Medical knowledge and teamwork predict the quality of case summary statements as an indicator of clinical reasoning in undergraduate medical students.医学知识和团队合作可预测病例总结陈述的质量,而病例总结陈述是本科医学生临床推理的一项指标。
GMS J Med Educ. 2019 Nov 15;36(6):Doc83. doi: 10.3205/zma001291. eCollection 2019.
10
Exploring sociodemographic subgroup differences in multiple mini-interview (MMI) performance based on MMI station type and the implications for the predictive fairness of the Hamburg MMI.探讨基于多站式迷你面试(MMI)中面试站点类型的社会人口统计学亚组差异及其对汉堡 MMI 预测公平性的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jul 3;19(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1674-z.

本文引用的文献

1
[Medical school admission test at the University of Goettingen - which applicants will benefit?].[哥廷根大学医学院入学考试——哪些申请者将从中受益?]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(10):609-17. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.09.024. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
2
Community college pathways: improving the U.S. physician workforce pipeline.社区学院途径:改善美国医生劳动力输送渠道
Acad Med. 2014 Dec;89(12):1649-56. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000438.
3
Removing the interview for medical school selection is associated with gender bias among enrolled students.取消医学院入学面试与入学学生中的性别偏见有关。
Med J Aust. 2014 Feb 3;200(2):96-9. doi: 10.5694/mja13.10103.
4
The impact of preparatory activities on medical school selection outcomes: a cross-sectional survey of applicants to the University of Adelaide Medical School in 2007.准备活动对医学院选择结果的影响:2007 年阿德莱德大学医学院申请人的横断面调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Dec 1;13:159. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-159.
5
Socio-economic predictors of performance in the Undergraduate Medicine and Health Sciences Admission Test (UMAT).本科医学和健康科学入学考试(UMAT)表现的社会经济预测因素。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Nov 29;13:155. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-155.
6
Admission criteria and diversity in medical school.医学院的录取标准和多样性。
Med Educ. 2013 Jun;47(6):557-61. doi: 10.1111/medu.12140.
7
Preparation courses for a medical admissions test: effectiveness contrasts with opinion.医学入学考试备考课程:效果与观点对比。
Med Educ. 2013 Apr;47(4):417-24. doi: 10.1111/medu.12124.
8
Do racial and ethnic group differences in performance on the MCAT exam reflect test bias?族裔和种族群体在 MCAT 考试表现上的差异是否反映了考试的偏差?
Acad Med. 2013 May;88(5):593-602. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318286803a.
9
Widening access to UK medical education for under-represented socioeconomic groups: modelling the impact of the UKCAT in the 2009 cohort.拓宽代表性不足的社会经济群体进入英国医学教育的途径:2009 年队列中 UKCAT 的影响建模。
BMJ. 2012 Apr 17;344:e1805. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e1805.
10
"What do they want me to say?" The hidden curriculum at work in the medical school selection process: a qualitative study.他们希望我怎么说?医学院校选拔过程中的隐性课程:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Mar 26;12:17. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-17.

医学院入学考试:父母是医生的学生有优势吗?

Medical school admission test: advantages for students whose parents are medical doctors?

作者信息

Simmenroth-Nayda Anne, Görlich Yvonne

机构信息

Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, University Medical Center, Humboldtallee 38, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.

Study Deanery, University Medical Center, Humboldtallee 38, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2015 Apr 23;15:81. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0354-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-015-0354-x
PMID:25898946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4409754/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Admission candidates especially in medicine do not represent the socio-demographic proportions of the average population: children of parents with an academic background are highly overrepresented, and those with parents who are medical doctors represent quite a large and special group. At Göttingen University Medicine, a new admission procedure was established with the intention to broaden the base of applicants towards including candidates with previous medical training or lower final school grades. With a view to family background, we wished to know whether candidates differ in the test scores in our admission procedure.

METHODS

In February 2014 we asked all admission candidates of Göttingen University Medicine by questionnaire (nine closed, four open questions) about the academic background in their families, specifically, the medical background, school exam grades, and previous medical training as well as about how they prepared for the admission test. We also analysed data from admission scores of this group (semi-structured interview and four multiple mini-interviews). In addition to descriptive statistics, we used a Pearson correlation, means comparisons (t-test, analysis of variance), ANOVA, and a Scheffé test.

RESULTS

In February 2014 nearly half of the applicants (44%) at Göttingen University Medicine had a medical background, most frequently, their parents were physicians. This rate is much higher than reported in the literature. Other socio-demographic baseline data did not differ from the percentages given in the literature. Of all applicants, 20% had previous medical training. The group of applicants with parents who were medical doctors did not show any advantage in either test-scoring (MMI and interview), their individual preparation for the admission test, or in receiving or accepting a place at medical school. Candidates with parents who were medical doctors had scored slightly lower in school exam grades.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that there is a self-selection bias as well as a pre-selection for this particular group of applicants. This effect has to be observed during future admission procedures.

摘要

背景

录取候选人,尤其是医学专业的候选人,并不能代表普通人群的社会人口统计学比例:父母具有学术背景的子女比例过高,而父母是医生的候选人则构成了一个相当庞大且特殊的群体。在哥廷根大学医学院,我们制定了一项新的录取程序,旨在扩大申请人范围,将之前接受过医学培训或高中毕业成绩较低的候选人纳入其中。关于家庭背景,我们想了解在我们的录取程序中,候选人的考试成绩是否存在差异。

方法

2014年2月,我们通过问卷调查(九个封闭式问题、四个开放式问题)询问了哥廷根大学医学院所有录取候选人的家庭学术背景,具体包括医学背景、学校考试成绩、之前的医学培训情况,以及他们为录取考试做准备的方式。我们还分析了该群体的录取分数数据(半结构化面试和四次多重迷你面试)。除描述性统计外,我们还使用了Pearson相关性分析、均值比较(t检验、方差分析)、方差分析和Scheffé检验。

结果

2014年2月,哥廷根大学医学院近一半的申请人(44%)有医学背景,其中大多数人的父母是医生。这一比例远高于文献报道。其他社会人口统计学基线数据与文献中的百分比没有差异。所有申请人中,20%曾接受过医学培训。父母是医生的申请人在任何一项考试评分(多重迷你面试和面试)、他们为录取考试的个人准备情况,或在获得或接受医学院录取资格方面都没有表现出优势。父母是医生的候选人在学校考试成绩上略低。

结论

我们的结果表明,对于这一特定申请人群体存在自我选择偏差和预选情况。在未来的录取程序中必须注意到这种影响。