Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Saint Luke's Mid-America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri; Department of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri.
Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Saint Luke's Mid-America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri; Department of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri.
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Apr 1;113(7):1130-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.12.017. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
Development of hospital-acquired anemia (HAA) during acute myocardial infarction may be related to processes of care and is associated with poor outcomes. Little is known about variation in the incidence of HAA across hospitals or the hospital characteristics associated with HAA. We studied 17,676 patients with acute myocardial infarction without anemia at admission, defining HAA as a hemoglobin decline below anemia diagnostic thresholds and moderate-to-severe HAA as a hemoglobin decline to <11 g/dl. We calculated median rate ratios (MRRs), the median value of the relative risk (RR) for HAA for 2 patients with identical characteristics presenting to 2 randomly selected hospitals, to identify variation in HAA adjusting for patient characteristics. Separate models were fit to test the association between hospital characteristics and HAA. HAA (57.5%) and moderate-to-severe HAA (20.1%) were common. The incidence of HAA varied substantially across hospitals and remained significant after multivariable adjustment (any HAA: MRR 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 1.13; moderate-to-severe HAA: MRR 1.27, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.39). Adjusting for patient characteristics, teaching status (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.97 vs nonteaching status), and region (Northeast vs Midwest: RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.19; West vs Midwest: RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.33, respectively) was associated with risk of HAA. Teaching status (RR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6 to 0.9 vs nonteaching status) and region (South vs Midwest: RR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.5) were independently associated with moderate-to-severe HAA. In conclusion, we observed significant variability in the incidence of HAA across hospitals and found a lower risk of HAA at teaching centers, suggesting that qualitative studies of the relation between HAA and processes of care are needed to identify targets for quality improvement.
在急性心肌梗死期间发生医院获得性贫血(HAA)可能与治疗过程有关,并与不良结局相关。关于医院之间 HAA 的发生率差异以及与 HAA 相关的医院特征知之甚少。我们研究了 17676 例入院时无贫血的急性心肌梗死患者,将 HAA 定义为血红蛋白下降至贫血诊断阈值以下,中重度 HAA 定义为血红蛋白下降至<11g/dl。我们计算了中位数率比(MRR),即 2 名具有相同特征的患者分别就诊于 2 家随机选择的医院时 HAA 的相对风险(RR)的中位数,以在调整患者特征后确定 HAA 的差异。单独的模型用于检验医院特征与 HAA 之间的关联。HAA(57.5%)和中重度 HAA(20.1%)很常见。HAA 在医院之间的发生率差异很大,并且在多变量调整后仍然具有统计学意义(任何 HAA:MRR 1.09,95%置信区间[CI]1.07 至 1.13;中重度 HAA:MRR 1.27,95%CI 1.19 至 1.39)。调整患者特征后,教学状态(RR 0.91,95%CI 0.84 至 0.97 与非教学状态)和地区(东北地区与中西部地区:RR 1.10,95%CI 1.01 至 1.19;西部地区与中西部地区:RR 1.19,95%CI 1.06 至 1.33)与 HAA 风险相关。教学状态(RR 0.7,95%CI 0.6 至 0.9 与非教学状态)和地区(南部与中西部地区:RR 1.3,95%CI 1.0 至 1.5)与中重度 HAA 独立相关。总之,我们观察到医院之间 HAA 的发生率存在显著差异,并且在教学中心 HAA 的风险较低,这表明需要进行定性研究以确定 HAA 与治疗过程之间的关系,从而确定质量改进的目标。