Lee Tae Wha, Ji Yoonjung, Yoon Yea Seul
College of Nursing and Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
College of Nursing and Brain Korea, 21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2022 Dec;52(6):564-581. doi: 10.4040/jkan.22032.
This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Readiness for Practice Survey (K-RPS).
The English Readiness for Practice Survey was translated into Korean using the Translation, Review, Adjudication, Pretesting, and Documentation (TRAPD) method. Secondary data analysis was performed using the dataset from the New Nurse e-Cohort study (Panel 2020) in South Korea. This study used a nationally representative sample of 812 senior nursing students. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were also conducted. Convergent validity within the items and discriminant validity between factors were assessed to evaluate construct validity. Construct validity for hypothesis testing was evaluated using convergent and discriminant validity. Ordinary α was used to assess reliability.
The K-RPS comprises 20 items examining four factors: clinical problem solving, learning experience, professional responsibilities, and professional preparation. Although the convergent validity of the items was successfully verified, discriminant validity between the factors was not. The K-RPS construct validity was verified using a bi-factor model (CMIN/DF 2.20, RMSEA .06, TLI .97, CFI .97, and PGFI .59). The K-RPS was significantly correlated with self-esteem ( = .43, < .001) and anxiety about clinical practicum ( = -.50, < .001). Internal consistency was reliable based on an ordinary α of .88.
The K-RPS is both valid and reliable and can be used as a standardized Korean version of the Readiness for Practice measurement tool.
本研究旨在评估韩文版实践准备情况调查问卷（K-RPS）的有效性和可靠性。
采用翻译、审核、裁定、预测试和记录（TRAPD）方法将英文版实践准备情况调查问卷翻译成韩文。使用韩国新护士电子队列研究（2020年小组）的数据进行二次数据分析。本研究使用了812名高级护理专业学生的全国代表性样本。还进行了探索性和验证性因素分析。评估项目内的收敛效度和因素间的区分效度以评估结构效度。使用收敛效度和区分效度评估假设检验的结构效度。使用普通α评估可靠性。
K-RPS包含20个项目，考察四个因素：临床问题解决、学习经历、职业责任和专业准备。虽然项目的收敛效度得到了成功验证，但因素间的区分效度未得到验证。使用双因素模型验证了K-RPS的结构效度（CMIN/DF 2.20，RMSEA.06，TLI.97，CFI.97，PGFI.59）。K-RPS与自尊显著相关（r =.43，p <.001），与临床实习焦虑显著相关（r = -.50，p <.001）。基于普通α为.88，内部一致性可靠。
K-RPS既有效又可靠，可作为实践准备情况测量工具的标准化韩文版使用。
