Kim Ocksim, Kim Kyoung-A, Chu Sang Hui
Department of Nursing, Yonsei University College of Nursing and Brain Korea 21 FOUR Project, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Nursing, College of Nursing, Gachon University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Psychiatry Investig. 2023 Jul;20(7):593-608. doi: 10.30773/pi.2022.0363. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is highly prevalent among North Korean defectors. This scoping review aimed to appraise the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that assess PTSD among North Korean defectors.
A systematic search was conducted using Research Information Sharing Service, ScienceON, PubMed, and Embase from their inception up to September 15, 2022. Each measurement properties of the included PROMs were evaluated using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology. First, the methodological quality of each study on measurement properties was evaluated using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. Second, the result of each single study on a measurement property was rated against the updated criteria for good measurement properties.
After screening the articles, nine instruments from 40 studies were included. Among these instruments, Impact of Event ScaleRevised was the most frequently used (13 studies [38.1%]), followed by the Trauma Scale for North Korean Refugees, PTSD Checklist, and Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale. The theoretical basis of all PROMs was secure in terms of content validity. The most frequently tested characteristics in measurement properties for internal structure were internal consistency, criterion validity, and convergent validity. No study reported sufficient structural validity as confirmatory factor analysis results with a model fit.
There is insufficient evidence to support the recommendation of a specific PROM for use among North Korean defectors with PTSD.
创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)在朝鲜叛逃者中高度流行。本范围综述旨在评估用于评估朝鲜叛逃者PTSD的患者报告结局测量工具(PROMs)的测量属性。
使用研究信息共享服务、ScienceON、PubMed和Embase从其创刊至2022年9月15日进行系统检索。使用基于共识的健康状况测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)方法评估纳入的PROMs的每个测量属性。首先,使用COSMIN偏倚风险清单评估每项测量属性研究的方法学质量。其次,根据更新后的良好测量属性标准对每项关于测量属性的单项研究结果进行评分。
在筛选文章后,纳入了40项研究中的9种工具。在这些工具中,修订后的事件影响量表使用最为频繁(13项研究[38.1%]),其次是朝鲜难民创伤量表、PTSD检查表和创伤后诊断量表。就内容效度而言,所有PROMs的理论基础都是可靠的。内部结构测量属性中最常测试的特征是内部一致性、效标效度和收敛效度。没有研究报告有足够的结构效度作为具有模型拟合的验证性因素分析结果。
没有足够的证据支持推荐在患有PTSD的朝鲜叛逃者中使用特定的PROM。