• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

犹豫不决者的抉择:内隐态度预测未决选民未来的投票行为。

Decisions among the undecided: implicit attitudes predict future voting behavior of undecided voters.

作者信息

Lundberg Kristjen B, Payne B Keith

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 29;9(1):e85680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085680. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0085680
PMID:24489666
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3906000/
Abstract

Implicit attitudes have been suggested as a key to unlock the hidden preferences of undecided voters. Past research, however, offered mixed support for this hypothesis. The present research used a large nationally representative sample and a longitudinal design to examine the predictive utility of implicit and explicit attitude measures in the 2008 U.S. presidential election. In our analyses, explicit attitudes toward candidates predicted voting better for decided than undecided voters, but implicit candidate attitudes were predictive of voting for both decided and undecided voters. Extending our examination to implicit and explicit racial attitudes, we found the same pattern. Taken together, these results provide convergent evidence that implicit attitudes predict voting about as well for undecided as for decided voters. We also assessed a novel explanation for these effects by evaluating whether implicit attitudes may predict the choices of undecided voters, in part, because they are neglected when people introspect about their confidence. Consistent with this idea, we found that the extremity of explicit but not implicit attitudes was associated with greater confidence. These analyses shed new light on the utility of implicit measures in predicting future behavior among individuals who feel undecided. Considering the prior studies together with this new evidence, the data seem to be consistent that implicit attitudes may be successful in predicting the behavior of undecided voters.

摘要

内隐态度被认为是解开未决选民隐藏偏好的关键。然而,过去的研究对这一假设的支持参差不齐。本研究使用了一个具有全国代表性的大样本和纵向设计,来检验2008年美国总统选举中内隐和外显态度测量的预测效用。在我们的分析中,对候选人的外显态度对已决定选民投票的预测比对未决选民更好,但内隐候选人态度对已决定和未决选民的投票都有预测作用。将我们的研究扩展到内隐和外显的种族态度,我们发现了相同的模式。综合来看,这些结果提供了趋同的证据,即内隐态度对未决选民和已决定选民投票的预测效果相当。我们还通过评估内隐态度是否可能部分因为人们在反思自己的信心时被忽视而预测未决选民的选择,来评估对这些影响的一种新解释。与这一观点一致,我们发现外显态度而非内隐态度的极端程度与更大的信心相关。这些分析为内隐测量在预测未决个体未来行为方面的效用提供了新的见解。综合先前的研究和这一新证据,数据似乎一致表明内隐态度可能成功预测未决选民的行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/681a/3906000/58fbda506969/pone.0085680.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/681a/3906000/94f4eacdf6c6/pone.0085680.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/681a/3906000/bd9b19e32bf8/pone.0085680.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/681a/3906000/58fbda506969/pone.0085680.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/681a/3906000/94f4eacdf6c6/pone.0085680.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/681a/3906000/bd9b19e32bf8/pone.0085680.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/681a/3906000/58fbda506969/pone.0085680.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Decisions among the undecided: implicit attitudes predict future voting behavior of undecided voters.犹豫不决者的抉择:内隐态度预测未决选民未来的投票行为。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 29;9(1):e85680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085680. eCollection 2014.
2
Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT) Predict Voting Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters in Swiss Referendums.单目标内隐联想测验(ST-IAT)可预测瑞士公投中已决定和未决定选民的投票行为。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 12;11(10):e0163872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163872. eCollection 2016.
3
Do implicit attitudes predict actual voting behavior particularly for undecided voters?内隐态度是否能预测实际投票行为,特别是对那些犹豫不决的选民?
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e44130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044130. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
4
Voting Intention and Choices: Are Voters Always Rational and Deliberative?投票意向与选择:选民总是理性且经过深思熟虑的吗?
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 17;11(2):e0148643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148643. eCollection 2016.
5
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
6
Brain indices of disagreement with one's social values predict EU referendum voting behavior.与个人社会价值观不一致的大脑指数预测了欧盟公投投票行为。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Nov 1;12(11):1758-1765. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx105.
7
Assumed policy similarity and voter preference.假定的政策相似性和选民偏好。
J Soc Psychol. 2003 Apr;143(2):149-62. doi: 10.1080/00224540309598437.
8
Predicting voting behavior with implicit attitude measures: the 2002 German parliamentary election.运用隐性态度测量预测投票行为:2002年德国议会选举
Exp Psychol. 2007;54(4):247-55. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.54.4.247.
9
Race, Gender, and the U.S. Presidency: A Comparison of Implicit and Explicit Biases in the Electorate.种族、性别与美国总统职位:选民中隐性偏见与显性偏见的比较
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Jan 17;12(1):17. doi: 10.3390/bs12010017.
10
Australian voters' attitudes to climate action and their social-political determinants.澳大利亚选民对气候行动的态度及其社会政治决定因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 24;16(3):e0248268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248268. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative Investigation of the Predictive Validity of Four Indirect Measures of Bias and Prejudice.四种间接偏见和歧视测量方法的预测有效性比较研究。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jun;50(6):871-888. doi: 10.1177/01461672221150229. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
2
Making peace with disliked others: the effects of a short loving-kindness meditation on implicit and explicit emotional evaluations.与不喜欢的人和解:短时间的慈爱冥想对内隐和外显情绪评估的影响。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Apr 29;10(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00817-5.
3
Early EEG responses to pre-electoral survey items reflect political attitudes and predict voting behavior.

本文引用的文献

1
Do implicit attitudes predict actual voting behavior particularly for undecided voters?内隐态度是否能预测实际投票行为,特别是对那些犹豫不决的选民?
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e44130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044130. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
2
Sequential priming measures of implicit social cognition: a meta-analysis of associations with behavior and explicit attitudes.序列启动法测量内隐社会认知:与行为和外显态度关联的元分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2012 Nov;16(4):330-50. doi: 10.1177/1088868312440047. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
3
Selective exposure in decided and undecided individuals: differential relations to automatic associations and conscious beliefs.
早期脑电图对选举前调查项目的反应反映了政治态度并能预测投票行为。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 21;11(1):18692. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96193-y.
4
Believability of evidence matters for correcting social impressions.证据的可信度对于纠正社会印象很重要。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 14;116(20):9802-9807. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903222116. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
5
Brain indices of disagreement with one's social values predict EU referendum voting behavior.与个人社会价值观不一致的大脑指数预测了欧盟公投投票行为。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Nov 1;12(11):1758-1765. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx105.
6
Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT) Predict Voting Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters in Swiss Referendums.单目标内隐联想测验(ST-IAT)可预测瑞士公投中已决定和未决定选民的投票行为。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 12;11(10):e0163872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163872. eCollection 2016.
7
Weekly Fluctuations in Risk Tolerance and Voting Behaviour.风险承受能力和投票行为的每周波动
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0159017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159017. eCollection 2016.
已决定和未决定个体的选择性暴露:与自动联想和意识信念的差异关系。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 May;38(5):559-69. doi: 10.1177/0146167211435981. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
4
Automatic mental associations predict future choices of undecided decision-makers.自动心理联想可预测未做决定的决策者未来的选择。
Science. 2008 Aug 22;321(5892):1100-2. doi: 10.1126/science.1160769.
5
Distinguishing automatic and controlled components of attitudes from direct and indirect measurement methods.从直接和间接测量方法中区分态度的自动和受控成分。
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2008 Mar;44(2):386-396. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.12.008.
6
Intuition and the correspondence between implicit and explicit self-esteem.直觉与内隐自尊和外显自尊之间的对应关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Dec;93(6):1067-79. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1067.
7
Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.评估中的联想与命题过程:内隐与外显态度改变的综合综述
Psychol Bull. 2006 Sep;132(5):692-731. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692.
8
An inkblot for attitudes: affect misattribution as implicit measurement.一种用于态度的墨迹测试:情感错误归因作为内隐测量。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Sep;89(3):277-93. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277.
9
A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures.关于内隐联想测验与外显自我报告测量之间相关性的一项荟萃分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Oct;31(10):1369-85. doi: 10.1177/0146167205275613.
10
Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction.隐性与显性偏见及跨种族互动
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jan;82(1):62-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.62.