Department of Psychology, Technical University of Braunschweig.
Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig.
Psychol Assess. 2014 Jun;26(2):484-92. doi: 10.1037/a0035721. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
Somatoform disorders are characterized by somatic symptoms that suggest a medical condition when such a condition is not present. Recently, Thomas and Locke (2010) and Jasper, Hiller, Rist, Bailer, and Witthöft (2012) found that the latent status of somatic symptom reporting may be best viewed from a dimensional perspective in a student, primary care, and an epilepsy-monitoring-unit setting using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form Somatic Complaints (RC1) Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15). To determine whether the latent status of somatic symptom reporting is dimensional in general population samples and across other measures, we analyzed the latent status of somatic symptom reporting in 2 large general German population samples using the PHQ-15 and Screening for Somatoform Symptoms (SOMS-7; N1 = 2,469; N2 = 2,434). We applied 3 popular taxometric methods: MAXEIG, MAMBAC, and L-Mode. In both samples, the analyses indicated a dimensional solution. Hence, the latent structure of somatic symptom reporting encompasses differences in degree rather than kind. Implications of the dimensional latent status of somatoform disorders regarding assessment and causality are discussed.
躯体形式障碍的特征是躯体症状,当不存在这种情况时,这些症状表明存在某种医学状况。最近,Thomas 和 Locke(2010)以及 Jasper、Hiller、Rist、Bailer 和 Witthöft(2012)发现,使用明尼苏达多相人格问卷-2 修订版躯体抱怨(RC1)量表和患者健康问卷(PHQ-15),在学生、初级保健和癫痫监测单元环境中,从维度的角度来看躯体症状报告的潜在状态可能是最佳的。为了确定躯体症状报告的潜在状态是否在一般人群样本中以及在其他测量中具有维度性,我们使用 PHQ-15 和躯体症状筛查(SOMS-7)对 2 个大型德国一般人群样本中的躯体症状报告的潜在状态进行了分析(N1=2469;N2=2434)。我们应用了 3 种流行的税则方法:MAXEIG、MAMBAC 和 L-Mode。在这两个样本中,分析表明存在维度解决方案。因此,躯体症状报告的潜在结构包含程度上的差异,而不是种类上的差异。讨论了躯体形式障碍的维度潜在状态对评估和因果关系的影响。