Suppr超能文献

多维情绪障碍量表(MEDI):评估跨诊断维度以验证情绪障碍分类的特征方法。

The Multidimensional Emotional Disorder Inventory (MEDI): Assessing transdiagnostic dimensions to validate a profile approach to emotional disorder classification.

机构信息

Center for Anxiety and Related Disorders.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2019 Jan;31(1):59-72. doi: 10.1037/pas0000649. Epub 2018 Aug 30.

Abstract

There has been limited progress evaluating the validity of dimensional approaches to emotional disorder classification. This has occurred in part because of a lack of standardized assessment tools developed with the specific intent of studying dimensional classification. The goal of the current study was to develop and validate the Multidimensional Emotional Disorder Inventory (MEDI) to efficiently assess nine empirically supported transdiagnostic dimensions proposed in the Brown and Barlow (2009) profile approach to emotional disorder classification: neurotic temperament, positive temperament, depression, autonomic arousal, somatic anxiety, social anxiety, intrusive cognitions, traumatic reexperiencing, and avoidance. The MEDI factor structure, reliability, and convergent/discriminant validity was evaluated in outpatients with emotional disorders (pilot sample = 227; validation sample = 780). The final 9-factor solution fit the data well. Intercorrelations among MEDI factors were consistent with previous research, and all MEDI dimensions had acceptable reliability. Correlations with common self-report questionnaires and DSM-5 diagnoses supported the convergent/discriminant validity of all nine MEDI dimensions. Collectively, these results support the use of 49-item MEDI in clinical research samples. The MEDI should be used in future research to evaluate the validity of the Brown and Barlow (2009) approach to emotional disorder classification. Because it provides an efficient assessment of several well-established emotional disorder traits and phenotypes, the MEDI also may have utility for general research or clinical purposes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

评估情绪障碍分类的维度方法的有效性方面进展有限。这在一定程度上是因为缺乏具有研究维度分类特定意图的标准化评估工具。本研究的目的是开发和验证多维情绪障碍量表(MEDI),以有效地评估 Brown 和 Barlow(2009)情绪障碍分类方法中提出的九种经验支持的跨诊断维度:神经质气质、积极气质、抑郁、自主唤醒、躯体焦虑、社交焦虑、侵入性认知、创伤再体验和回避。在情绪障碍门诊患者中评估了 MEDI 的因子结构、信度和聚合/区分效度(试点样本=227;验证样本=780)。最终的 9 因素解决方案很好地拟合了数据。MEDI 因子之间的相互关系与先前的研究一致,所有 MEDI 维度均具有可接受的信度。与常见的自我报告问卷和 DSM-5 诊断的相关性支持了所有九个 MEDI 维度的聚合/区分效度。总的来说,这些结果支持在临床研究样本中使用 49 项 MEDI。应在未来的研究中使用 MEDI 来评估 Brown 和 Barlow(2009)情绪障碍分类方法的有效性。由于它提供了对几种既定的情绪障碍特征和表型的有效评估,因此 MEDI 也可能具有一般研究或临床目的的实用性。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2018 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验