Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony, Lützerodestr. 9, 30161, Hannover, Germany.
Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and Assessment, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2018 Oct;46(7):1385-1394. doi: 10.1007/s10802-017-0383-5.
Although disruptive behavior disorders (DBDs) are used as a distinct categorical diagnosis in clinical practice, they have repeatedly been described as having a dimensional structure in taxometric analyses. In the current study the authors analyzed the latent status of disruptive behaviors (DB) in a large sample (N = 2,808) of German preschool children (2-6 years old, mean age 53.7 months, SD = 13.5, 48.4% girls). The Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) as well as the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) were used to compile indicators of the DB core dimensions (Temper Loss, Aggression, Noncompliance, and Low Concern for others). Three widely used taxometric methods (a) MAXEIG, (b) MAMBAC, and (c) L-Mode were applied. Simulation data were created to evaluate the Comparison Curve Fit Index values (CCFIs), which were below 0.45, supporting a dimensional solution. Hence, in the current study the latent structure of DB in preschoolers encompassed differences in degree rather than kind. Researchers and practitioners should be mindful of the dimensional latent status of DB in theory building, assessment, classification, and labeling.
虽然破坏性行为障碍(DBD)在临床实践中被用作一种明确的分类诊断,但在计量分析中,它们被反复描述为具有维度结构。在当前的研究中,作者分析了一个大型样本(N=2808)德国学龄前儿童(2-6 岁,平均年龄 53.7 个月,SD=13.5,48.4%为女孩)的破坏性行为(DB)潜在状态。采用 Eyberg 儿童行为问卷(ECBI)和长处与困难问卷(SDQ)来编制 DB 核心维度(情绪失控、攻击、不服从和不关心他人)的指标。应用了三种广泛使用的计量方法(a)MAXEIG、(b)MAMBAC 和(c)L-Mode。创建了模拟数据来评估比较曲线拟合指数值(CCFIs),结果低于 0.45,支持维度解决方案。因此,在当前的研究中,学龄前儿童的 DB 潜在结构包含程度上的差异,而不是种类上的差异。研究人员和从业者应该在理论构建、评估、分类和标签方面注意 DB 的维度潜在状态。