Hixson S M, Parrish C C
Department of Ocean Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Marine Lab Road, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador A1C 5S7, Canada.
J Anim Sci. 2014 Mar;92(3):1055-67. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-7146. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
Developing a commercially relevant Atlantic cod aquaculture industry will require improvements in feed sustainability. Camelina oil and meal are potential replacements of fish oil and fish meal in aquaculture feeds. Camelina oil is high in 18:3ω3 (30%), with an ω3/ω6 ratio > 1. Camelina meal has a considerable crude protein level (38%), which includes significant amounts of methionine and phenylalanine. Four diets were tested; each diet was fed to triplicate tanks (3 tanks per diet) of Atlantic cod (14.4 g/fish; 70 fish per tank) for 13 wk. The diets included a fish oil/fish meal control (FO) and three diets which replaced 100% of fish oil with camelina oil: one diet contained fish meal (100CO), another solvent extracted fish meal (100COSEFM), and another had fish meal partially reduced by 15% inclusion of camelina meal (100CO15CM). Growth was measured (length and weight) and tissue samples were collected for lipid analysis (muscle, liver, brain, gut, spleen, skin, and carcass) at wk 0 (before feeding the experimental diet) and at wk 13. Cod fed camelina oil had a lower (P < 0.001) final weight than cod fed the FO diet (50.8 ± 10.3 g/fish). Cod fed 100CO15CM had a lower (P < 0.001) final weight (35.0 ± 8.0 g) than those fed 100CO (43.6 ± 8.9 g) and 100COSEFM (46.7 ± 10.7 g). Cod tissues in the 100COSEFM treatment were most impacted by dietary fatty acid profile. Multivariate statistics revealed that FO and 100COSEFM tissue fatty acid profiles were 21 to 31% different, depending on tissue type. The full replacement of fish oil with camelina oil, plus solvent extracted fish meal had an overarching effect on the entire fatty acid profile of the whole animal. Fatty acid mass balance calculations indicated that cod fed 100COSEFM elongated 13% of 18:3ω3 to 20:3ω3 and oxidized the remaining 87%, whereas cod fed fish oil showed a much lower (P < 0.001) elongation of 18:3ω3 of 1.6%. These results suggest that excess 18:3ω3 from camelina oil caused some fatty acid elongation, but little desaturation. Energy budget estimates indicated that cod fed 100COSEFM deposited the most energy throughout the trial (60 kJ/fish; P = 0.019), mostly in the liver (90%). Excess camelina lipids were not necessarily utilized for energy, which likely impacted growth. Feeding 100% camelina oil to Atlantic cod impacted growth and lipid and fatty acid composition; however, additional removal of fish oil from fish meal caused the greatest change in cod lipid composition and utilization.
发展具有商业价值的大西洋鳕鱼养殖业需要提高饲料的可持续性。亚麻荠油和亚麻荠粕有望替代水产养殖饲料中的鱼油和鱼粉。亚麻荠油富含18:3ω3(30%),ω3/ω6比例大于1。亚麻荠粕的粗蛋白含量可观(38%),其中包括大量的蛋氨酸和苯丙氨酸。对四种饲料进行了测试;每种饲料投喂三组大西洋鳕鱼(每组3个养殖槽)(初始体重14.4克/鱼,每个养殖槽70尾鱼),为期13周。饲料包括一种鱼油/鱼粉对照饲料(FO)和三种用亚麻荠油完全替代鱼油的饲料:一种饲料含有鱼粉(100CO),另一种含有溶剂萃取鱼粉(100COSEFM),还有一种鱼粉含量部分减少15%并添加了亚麻荠粕(100CO15CM)。在第0周(投喂实验饲料前)和第13周测量生长情况(体长和体重),并采集组织样本进行脂质分析(肌肉、肝脏、脑、肠道、脾脏、皮肤和鱼体)。投喂亚麻荠油的鳕鱼最终体重低于投喂FO饲料的鳕鱼(P < 0.001)(50.8 ± 10.3克/鱼)。投喂100CO15CM的鳕鱼最终体重低于投喂100CO(43.6 ± 8.9克)和100COSEFM(46.7 ± 10.7克)的鳕鱼(P < 0.001)(35.0 ± 8.0克)。100COSEFM处理组的鳕鱼组织受饲料脂肪酸组成影响最大。多变量统计显示,FO和100COSEFM组织的脂肪酸组成差异为21%至31%,具体取决于组织类型。用亚麻荠油完全替代鱼油,再加上溶剂萃取鱼粉,对整个动物的脂肪酸组成产生了全面影响。脂肪酸质量平衡计算表明,投喂100COSEFM的鳕鱼将13%的18:3ω3延长为20:3ω3,并氧化了其余的87%,而投喂鱼油的鳕鱼18:3ω3的延长率则低得多(P < 0.001),为1.6%。这些结果表明,亚麻荠油中过量的18:3ω3导致了一些脂肪酸的延长,但去饱和作用很小。能量预算估计表明,在整个试验期间,投喂100COSEFM的鳕鱼储存的能量最多(60千焦/鱼;P = 0.019),大部分储存在肝脏中(90%)。过量的亚麻荠脂质不一定用于提供能量,这可能影响了生长。给大西洋鳕鱼投喂100%的亚麻荠油会影响生长以及脂质和脂肪酸组成;然而,进一步去除鱼粉中的鱼油会导致鳕鱼脂质组成和利用发生最大变化。