Bekemeier H, Hirschelmann R, Weber M
Wissenschaftsbereich Pharmakologie der Sektion Pharmazie der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle.
Pharmazie. 1987 Oct;42(10):680-6.
There is no group proof of long acting antirheumatics (LAA) in laboratory animal models, and it is not to be expected without an identical rheumatoid arthritis model in animals and with regard to the heterogeneity of LAA. However, LAA are to be detected according to D-penicillamine-like, levamisol-like etc. actions, which can be disclosed in the adjuvant arthritis as well as in the B. pertussis-vaccine pleuritis in rats the latter model best by including parameters of inflammatory exudate cells. Modification of the models or of model parameters (BCG-sensibilization, PPD reaction, vasoreactivity, RNA content of exudate cells, SH groups, copper zinc) are hardly advantageous, contrarily to dosage. Other models, among them paw edemas, do not permit sufficient testing of LAA, even not the methyl-albumin mice paw edema. There is no problem of pharmacologically separating LAA actions from nonsteroidal or steroidal antiphlogistics actions.
在实验动物模型中,尚无长效抗风湿药(LAA)的群体证据,而且在没有相同的动物类风湿性关节炎模型以及考虑到LAA的异质性的情况下,也无法预期会有此类证据。然而,LAA可根据类似青霉胺、左旋咪唑等的作用来检测,这些作用在佐剂性关节炎以及大鼠百日咳疫苗胸膜炎中均可显现,后者通过纳入炎性渗出细胞参数的模型效果最佳。与剂量不同,对模型或模型参数(卡介苗致敏、PPD反应、血管反应性、渗出细胞的RNA含量、巯基、铜锌)进行修改几乎没有益处。其他模型,包括爪部水肿模型,甚至甲基白蛋白小鼠爪部水肿模型,都无法对LAA进行充分测试。从药理学角度将LAA的作用与非甾体或甾体抗炎作用区分开来不存在问题。