• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Great expectations for participatory research: what have we achieved in the last ten years?

作者信息

Wykes Til

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.

出版信息

World Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;13(1):24-7. doi: 10.1002/wps.20086.

DOI:10.1002/wps.20086
PMID:24497239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3918010/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Great expectations for participatory research: what have we achieved in the last ten years?对参与式研究的厚望：过去十年我们取得了哪些成就？
World Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;13(1):24-7. doi: 10.1002/wps.20086.
2
Shaping understandings through reflexive practice: Learnings from participatory research on aging with multiple sclerosis.通过反思性实践塑造认知：从关于多发性硬化症患者老龄化的参与式研究中获得的经验教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jul 31;10(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00614-x.
3
Using participatory approaches with older people in a residential home in Guyana: challenges and tensions.在圭亚那一家养老院中与老年人采用参与式方法：挑战与矛盾
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2013 Mar;28(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s10823-012-9182-1.
4
International Participatory Research Framework: triangulating procedures to build health research capacity in Brazil.国际参与式研究框架：在巴西建立卫生研究能力的三角程序。
Health Promot Int. 2012 Dec;27(4):435-44. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dar090. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
5
Using Participatory Learning & Action (PLA) research techniques for inter-stakeholder dialogue in primary healthcare: an analysis of stakeholders' experiences.运用参与式学习与行动（PLA）研究技术开展基层医疗保健中的利益相关者间对话：利益相关者经验分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Dec 6;3:28. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0077-8. eCollection 2017.
6
Exploring the subjective experience of researchers and co-researchers with lived experience of psychosis high risk states: a qualitative analysis within a participatory research process.探索有精神病高风险状态亲身经历的研究者和共同研究者的主观体验：参与式研究过程中的定性分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):899. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06367-x.
7
How did the context of COVID-19 affect the implementation and mechanisms of participatory learning and action to address type 2 diabetes? Mixed-methods research in rural Bangladesh.2019年冠状病毒病的背景如何影响参与式学习和行动以应对2型糖尿病的实施情况及机制？孟加拉国农村地区的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 3;15(4):e089288. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089288.
8
Facilitating Community Participants' Research Engagement: Community Members' Perceptions of Community-based Research.促进社区参与者的研究参与：社区成员对基于社区的研究的看法。
Int J Nurs Clin Pract. 2015;2. doi: 10.15344/2394-4978/2015/142. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
9
Expectation changes and team characteristics in a participatory design process.
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:5099-107. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-1044-5099.
10
The Ottawa Citizen Engagement and Action Model (OCEAM): A Citizen engagement Strategy Operationalized Through The Participatory Research in Ottawa, Management and Point-of-care of Tobacco (PROMPT) Study: A Community Based Participatory Action Research Project in Inner City Ottawa.渥太华公民参与与行动模式（OCEAM）：一种通过渥太华烟草管理与现场护理参与式研究（PROMPT）实施的公民参与策略：渥太华市中心的一项基于社区的参与式行动研究项目。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 May 21;2:20. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0034-y. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Citizen science for research in public health: perspective.用于公共卫生研究的公民科学：视角
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;13:1594293. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1594293. eCollection 2025.
2
The interdependence of substance use, satisfaction with life, and psychological distress: a dynamic structural equation model analysis.物质使用、生活满意度与心理困扰之间的相互依存关系：动态结构方程模型分析
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 9;15:1288551. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1288551. eCollection 2024.
3
Risk-based contracting for high-need Medicaid beneficiaries: The Arkansas PASSE program.针对高需求医疗补助受益人的基于风险的合同：阿肯色州PASSE项目
Health Policy Open. 2020 Dec 3;2:100023. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2020.100023. eCollection 2021 Dec.
4
Codeveloping and Evaluating a Campaign to Reduce Dementia Misconceptions on Twitter: Machine Learning Study.共同开发并评估一项在推特上减少痴呆症误解的活动：机器学习研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Nov 22;2(2):e36871. doi: 10.2196/36871. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
5
Investigating mental health service user views of stigma on Twitter during COVID-19: a mixed-methods study.调查 COVID-19 期间 Twitter 上精神卫生服务使用者对污名的看法：一项混合方法研究。
J Ment Health. 2022 Aug;31(4):576-584. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2022.2091763. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
6
Investigation of Carers' Perspectives of Dementia Misconceptions on Twitter: Focus Group Study.关于照顾者对推特上痴呆症误解观点的调查：焦点小组研究。
JMIR Aging. 2022 Jan 24;5(1):e30388. doi: 10.2196/30388.
7
Improving quality of life assessments for high-need adult Medicaid service users with mental health conditions.改善有心理健康状况的高需求成年医疗补助服务使用者的生活质量评估。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Apr;30(4):1155-1164. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02694-0. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
8
The impact of public involvement in health research: what are we measuring? Why are we measuring it? Should we stop measuring it?公众参与健康研究的影响：我们在衡量什么？为何要衡量？是否应停止衡量？
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Oct 27;6:63. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00239-w. eCollection 2020.
9
Development and psychometric properties of a new brief scale for subjective personal agency (SPA-5) in people with schizophrenia.主观个人能动性新简式量表（SPA-5）在精神分裂症患者中的编制及心理测量学特性研究。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 Apr 10;29:e111. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000256.
10
"A Life More Ordinary" Processes of 5-Year Recovery From Substance Abuse. Experiences of 30 Recovered Service Users.《更平凡的生活》：从药物滥用中恢复五年的历程。30名康复服务使用者的经历
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 18;10:689. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00689. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of patient involvement in mental health research: longitudinal study.患者参与心理健康研究的影响：纵向研究。
Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;203(5):381-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.119818. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
2
Schizophrenia: Patients' research priorities get funded.精神分裂症：患者的研究重点获得资助。
Nature. 2012 Jul 25;487(7408):432. doi: 10.1038/487432b.
3
Understanding service user-defined continuity of care and its relationship to health and social measures: a cross-sectional study.理解服务使用者定义的连续性护理及其与健康和社会措施的关系：一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun 8;12:145. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-145.
4
VOICE: developing a new measure of service users' perceptions of inpatient care, using a participatory methodology.声音：使用参与式方法开发新的住院服务使用者感知评估工具。
J Ment Health. 2012 Feb;21(1):57-71. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2011.629240.
5
Selecting outcome measures in mental health: the views of service users.选择心理健康的结果测量指标：服务使用者的观点。
J Ment Health. 2011 Aug;20(4):336-46. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2011.577114.
6
Close to the bench as well as at the bedside: involving service users in all phases of translational research.贴近板凳，也贴近病床：让服务使用者参与转化研究的各个阶段。
Health Expect. 2012 Dec;15(4):389-400. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00681.x. Epub 2011 May 25.
7
Analysis of clinical uncertainties by health professionals and patients: an example from mental health.医疗专业人员和患者对临床不确定性的分析：以心理健康领域为例。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Jul 10;9:34. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-34.
8
Narrating uncertainties about treatment of mental health conditions.讲述心理健康状况治疗方面的不确定性。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2010 Mar;45(3):371-9. doi: 10.1007/s00127-009-0072-y. Epub 2009 May 24.
9
The meaning of translational research and why it matters.转化研究的意义及其重要性。
JAMA. 2008 Jan 9;299(2):211-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2007.26.
10
What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies.哪些因素会影响随机对照试验的受试者招募？对由两家英国资助机构资助的试验的综述。
Trials. 2006 Apr 7;7:9. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-7-9.