Gröpel Peter, Baumeister Roy F, Beckmann Jürgen
1Technische Universität München, Germany.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Apr;40(4):476-87. doi: 10.1177/0146167213516636. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
Three studies investigated the role of action versus state orientation in how people deal with depletion of self-control resources. Action-oriented persons were expected to continue allocating resources and hence to perform better than state-oriented persons who were expected to conserve strength. Consistent with this, action-oriented persons performed better on the d2 test of attention than state-oriented persons after a strenuous physical exercise (Study 1), showed higher acuity on the critical fusion frequency test after a test of vigilance (Study 2), and performed better on the Stroop test after a depleting sensorimotor task (Study 3). No differences emerged between action- and state-oriented persons in their initial performance and in a non-depleting context. The impact of depletion on subsequent performance is thus not fixed, but moderated by personality.
三项研究调查了行动导向与状态导向在人们应对自我控制资源耗竭方式中的作用。预计行动导向型的人会继续分配资源,因此表现会优于预计会保存体力的状态导向型的人。与此一致的是,在剧烈体育锻炼后,行动导向型的人在注意力的d2测试中比状态导向型的人表现更好(研究1);在进行警觉性测试后,行动导向型的人在临界融合频率测试中敏锐度更高(研究2);在完成一项消耗性的感觉运动任务后,行动导向型的人在斯特鲁普测试中表现更好(研究3)。在初始表现和非消耗性情境中,行动导向型和状态导向型的人之间没有差异。因此,耗竭对后续表现的影响不是固定不变的,而是受人格因素调节的。