Department of Psychology, Peking University, China.
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Sep;22(3):816-21. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
The resource-based model of self-regulation provides a pessimistic view of self-regulation that people are destined to lose their self-control after having engaged in any act of self-regulation because these acts deplete the limited resource that people need for successful self-regulation. The cognitive control theory, however, offers an alternative explanation and suggests that the depletion effect reflects switch costs between different cognitive control processes recruited to deal with demanding tasks. This account implies that the depletion effect will not occur once people have had the opportunity to adapt to the self-regulatory task initially engaged in. Consistent with this idea, the present study showed that engaging in a demanding task led to performance deficits on a subsequent self-regulatory task (i.e. the depletion effect) only when the initial demanding task was relatively short but not when it was long enough for participants to adapt. Our results were unrelated to self-efficacy, mood, and motivation.
自我调节的资源基础模型提供了一个悲观的自我调节观点,即人们在进行任何自我调节行为后都会注定失去自我控制,因为这些行为会耗尽人们成功进行自我调节所需的有限资源。然而,认知控制理论提供了另一种解释,认为消耗效应反映了在处理高要求任务时被招募的不同认知控制过程之间的转换成本。这一说法意味着,一旦人们有机会适应最初参与的自我调节任务,消耗效应就不会发生。与这一观点一致,本研究表明,只有在初始高要求任务相对较短而不是足够长以使参与者适应的情况下,从事一项高要求任务会导致随后的自我调节任务表现下降(即消耗效应)。我们的结果与自我效能感、情绪和动机无关。