Du Na, Ran Mao-Sheng, Liang Su-gai, SiTu Ming-jing, Huang Yi, Mansfield Abigail K, Keitner Gabor
Department of Psychiatry, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. E-mail:
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;26(1):47-56.
Family functioning influences the course and long-term outcome for patients with depression. It is important to understand the family functioning of depressed patients from the viewpoint both of patients and their family members. The objective of this study was to explore the association between family functioning and depression in a sample of Chinese families, using the Family Assessment Device (FAD) and the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales II (FACES II).
This study was conducted in a sample of 61 depressed patients and their family members and 61 nonclinical controls in mainland China. It compared the perception of depressed patients and their family members and evaluated agreement between family members.
Results indicate that in mainland China, functioning among families with a depressed family member is poorer than that of control families. Depressed patients reported less satisfaction than did their family members. There were significant differences on 4 of the 7 FAD scales among depressed patients and their family members, whereas no discrepancies were found on the FACES II. For the FAD, low agreement between patients and family members was found on all scales except behavioral control. Moderate agreement appeared on all dimensions of FACES II except for ideal cohesion and dissatisfaction with cohesion for the families of depressed patients.
Depression is associated with impaired family functioning in families in mainland China. When applying the FAD and FACES II to samples of Chinese families, clinicians should be aware that the FAD may be more sensitive to detecting problems in some areas than the FACES II.
家庭功能会影响抑郁症患者的病程及长期预后。从患者及其家庭成员的角度了解抑郁症患者的家庭功能非常重要。本研究的目的是使用家庭评估量表(FAD)和家庭适应性与凝聚性评估量表第二版(FACES II),探讨中国家庭样本中家庭功能与抑郁症之间的关联。
本研究在中国大陆的61名抑郁症患者及其家庭成员以及61名非临床对照者中进行。比较了抑郁症患者及其家庭成员的认知,并评估了家庭成员之间的一致性。
结果表明,在中国大陆,有抑郁症家庭成员的家庭功能比对照家庭差。抑郁症患者报告的满意度低于其家庭成员。抑郁症患者及其家庭成员在FAD的7个量表中的4个上存在显著差异,而在FACES II上未发现差异。对于FAD,除行为控制外,患者与家庭成员在所有量表上的一致性较低。在FACES II的所有维度上,除了理想凝聚性以及抑郁症患者家庭对凝聚性的不满外,均呈现中等一致性。
在中国大陆家庭中,抑郁症与家庭功能受损有关。在将FAD和FACES II应用于中国家庭样本时,临床医生应意识到FAD在检测某些领域的问题时可能比FACES II更敏感。