Suppr超能文献

使用家庭评估工具和家庭适应性与凝聚性评估量表II对中国抑郁症患者家庭与非临床对照家庭的家庭功能进行比较。

Comparison of family functioning in families of depressed patients and nonclinical control families in China using the Family Assessment Device and the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales II.

作者信息

Du Na, Ran Mao-Sheng, Liang Su-gai, SiTu Ming-jing, Huang Yi, Mansfield Abigail K, Keitner Gabor

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. E-mail:

出版信息

Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;26(1):47-56.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Family functioning influences the course and long-term outcome for patients with depression. It is important to understand the family functioning of depressed patients from the viewpoint both of patients and their family members. The objective of this study was to explore the association between family functioning and depression in a sample of Chinese families, using the Family Assessment Device (FAD) and the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales II (FACES II).

METHOD

This study was conducted in a sample of 61 depressed patients and their family members and 61 nonclinical controls in mainland China. It compared the perception of depressed patients and their family members and evaluated agreement between family members.

RESULTS

Results indicate that in mainland China, functioning among families with a depressed family member is poorer than that of control families. Depressed patients reported less satisfaction than did their family members. There were significant differences on 4 of the 7 FAD scales among depressed patients and their family members, whereas no discrepancies were found on the FACES II. For the FAD, low agreement between patients and family members was found on all scales except behavioral control. Moderate agreement appeared on all dimensions of FACES II except for ideal cohesion and dissatisfaction with cohesion for the families of depressed patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Depression is associated with impaired family functioning in families in mainland China. When applying the FAD and FACES II to samples of Chinese families, clinicians should be aware that the FAD may be more sensitive to detecting problems in some areas than the FACES II.

摘要

背景

家庭功能会影响抑郁症患者的病程及长期预后。从患者及其家庭成员的角度了解抑郁症患者的家庭功能非常重要。本研究的目的是使用家庭评估量表(FAD)和家庭适应性与凝聚性评估量表第二版(FACES II),探讨中国家庭样本中家庭功能与抑郁症之间的关联。

方法

本研究在中国大陆的61名抑郁症患者及其家庭成员以及61名非临床对照者中进行。比较了抑郁症患者及其家庭成员的认知,并评估了家庭成员之间的一致性。

结果

结果表明,在中国大陆,有抑郁症家庭成员的家庭功能比对照家庭差。抑郁症患者报告的满意度低于其家庭成员。抑郁症患者及其家庭成员在FAD的7个量表中的4个上存在显著差异,而在FACES II上未发现差异。对于FAD,除行为控制外,患者与家庭成员在所有量表上的一致性较低。在FACES II的所有维度上,除了理想凝聚性以及抑郁症患者家庭对凝聚性的不满外,均呈现中等一致性。

结论

在中国大陆家庭中,抑郁症与家庭功能受损有关。在将FAD和FACES II应用于中国家庭样本时,临床医生应意识到FAD在检测某些领域的问题时可能比FACES II更敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验